Vellum Venom Vignette: A Whole Lada Love For The Li’l Rivian

Rivian

Rivian, the embattled electric automaker behind the R1 truck/SUV and the Amazon EDV van, isn’t going down without a fight. And everyone loves an underdog, especially when their design team is tasked with making smaller, more affordable vehicles that promise the same good vibes of their current crop of aspirational designs.

That’s precisely what happened yesterday, as Rivian announced the R2 SUV and the R3 crossover. Thanks to the thoughtful body surfacing and a headlight signature that resembles a dual USB port, both concepts have the DNA of the original R1T flagship pickup.

The R2 rests on a new architecture, with party tricks like fold-down rear and front seating for camping trips. But it looks a bit derivative and dull, in a light beer served at a franchised restaurant kinda way. Enter the R3: Photos make it look far more delicious than its larger stablemate, like a hoppy craft brew served on an outdoor patio with a food truck parked nearby. While based on the R2’s platform, the R3 has a shorter wheelbase and, presumably, a cheaper asking price.

That’s a value proposition with some legs, and most of the online chatter since yesterday’s introduction is about the R3. That’s likely for good reason, as we currently have a dearth of small, affordable EVs that offer town-and-country substance with aspirational style. (Sorry Nissan Leaf and Chevy Bolt owners.)

Pricing has yet to be released, and that’s always a concern with an EV startup. Hopefully Rivian has learned from their mistakes because the R3 is hitting a chord with folks who want a cheaper vehicle with the requisite CUV dimensions and price point. This little rig does something that even the Ford Bronco Sport can’t do on with its portly, Escape-derived bones. Heck, even the clamshell hood cleans up the front view, giving good vibes on par with the affordable Kia Soul.

The R3 sits so perfectly on its haunches from the rear quarter view. The rear door’s dogleg hugs the wheel arch, evocative of the original Jeep Cherokee (XJ). The compact rear cabin makes for difficult ingress/egress, but there’s a purity to this design when paired with the upright roof pillars, flat cant rail, and aggressive horizontal bodyside creases. In a perfect world, this purity is paired with Chevy Bolt-like affordability.

But most enthusiasts can’t stop talking about the R3 trim with rally-car flair, the R3X. Analogies to the dynastic rule of the Lada Niva is prevalent across social media, and for good reason: both look like workaday passenger cars from a forgotten analog era, right down to the ride heights, upright B/C pillars, strong horizontal lines, and that flattering clamshell hood.

There’s something about the R3X that tugs at your heartstrings, just like a Lada does. (Or like a Subaru Crosstrek in a sea of Camry LEs, if vintage iron isn’t your jam.) Here we have a promise of added practicality via extra ride height, with a footprint suggesting a price point friendly to lending institutions eager to finance the lower rungs of our society. Of course, that’s relative to the $90,000-ish Rivian R1T, which I drove and quite enjoyed.

Slice the baby Riv’s look another way, and I’d suggest there’s a bit of the Group B rally Lancia Delta S4 in its design. The roofline is purposefully boxy, the creases are crispy, there’s a spoiler at the back, and the wheels fill up their arches like a race car. The latter even gives off the same anthracite vibes of the Delta HF Integrale.

Elliot Ross Studio

The Rivian family of vehicles is starting to look like a full line of modern SUVs and crossovers for modern lifestyles. Yesterday’s unveling of the R2, R3, and R3X have put the rest of the world on notice, and Rivian is clearly serious about reducing the fixed and variable costs that are an albatross around their neck.

The questions we have left are the same for all concepts: how much and when? Rivian says R2 pricing “is expected to start around $45,000, and R3 will be priced below R2.” Deliveries for the R2 are slated for 2026, but Rivian vaguely states that R3 and R3X deliveries will start sometime after that. Fantastic.

Those hoping for an R3/R3X aren’t getting the plausible price and timeline that buyers of the Escape-based Ford Maverick received back in 2021. And that affordable trucklet still suffered from tech-company-worthy production delays and price increases despite coming from a legacy automaker. That says nothing of the concern I have around Rivian’s negative contribution margin impacting its ability to deliver future product.

And if such financial and logistical headwinds feel like bizarre choices to include in a design column like Vellum Venom, just remember the author dropped out of car design school and got himself two business degrees. While I’d love to gush over the product, perhaps it’s wiser to have cautious optimism. As Neil Young said,

“It’s gonna take a ‘Lada’ love to change the way things are.”

***

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: What We Learned From Florida’s March Auctions

Comments

    I don’t see the Lada at all, excepet maybe in it’s overall small hatchback jacked up in the air stance. The Delta I saw immediately. It doesn’t even have to be the Delta Integrale. The whole Delta hatchback family of that era are all from the same core design. To me the upper and lower of the car feel disconnected. Not by a lot, but enough. The front and back especially feel Rivian modern where the middle and upper do not. It feels like a bit of a missed opportunity.

    The profile in my mind is closer to a Yugo if a Yugo had 4 doors

    It’s not really a bad looking machine, but I have a general issue with cars with faces. It is just hard to take them seriously

    Now that you mention it, yes it’s not Lada but Yugo. Still not a part of the world known for impressive styling. This thing is ok, it’s not terrible looking but nothing I would desire to spend $45k+ on.

    Don’t call it a Riv. That is a dishonor to the Buick Riviera. Nice, but just another expensive vehicle that misguidedly is destroying the ecology, cost to much and can’t do ever thing I need that an ICE vehicle does. Go eclectic or go home…..I will go home.

    I realize that it’s a preproduction vehicle but the interior shot looks more pedestrian than that of a Chevy Chevette, and well, wadayaknow, the body looks like a blimped out version of the same car. Its design definitely is stuck in the late 70’s – early 80’s US sold compact car shape (Gremlin, Chevette, Yugo, Rabbit, Pinto, Colt). It’s a little like a Jeep Eagle, but I don’t want to insult the Eagle. Why is there a rule in marketing that says if the car has sex appeal or is novel, the price shoots up? Example? Bronco. What an overpriced tin can that is not as good as a Toyota FJ. Let’s make it bland so it’s affordable. Have you seen what BMW and Porsche has been doing for the past 20 years at the same price point? Get a grip.

    Kudos to the author for doing his best to paint that turd.

    I think it looks awesome. Anything that evokes 80’s styling and Rally is OK in my book. Somehow though, I doubt this will be affordable.

    Sajeeve, these are some of the best articles on Hagerty. More please!
    Though I wonder how many readers do not click to read them because they, like I, don’t understand what the title means?

    Hi Gary, thank you for reading. I sincerely appreciate your kind words. I came up with the name personally, as a way to explain the level of detail and design criticism I want to give out to readers. It’s pretty down in the weeds. And when you get in the weeds like this, you might as well get a name that’s just as deep. But since you mentioned it, let me save you the trouble of looking it up:

    1. Vellum is an animal membrane used for drawing by designers.
    2. Venom is because I will give something its just deserts if needed
    3. Vignettes are small, decorative designs, not a full drawing…check out my full Vellum Venom articles to see the difference.

    https://www.hagerty.com/media/category/opinion/vellum-venom/

    I think it looks stupid. And the best of luck getting it fixed after a fender bender. I would rather drive my 67 Chevy C10 short box.

    I see a pic of a conventional, rear-hinged hood, not the clamshell mentioned twice in the article. Am I missing something?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.