Volkswagen Builds the Last VR6

Volkswagen

Pour one out for another great engine: Volkswagen has built the final VR6.

“After 34 years and nearly 1.87 million units produced, the iconic VR6 engine says farewell,” Andreas G. Schleith, a spokesperson for Volkswagen, wrote on LinkedIn. The last VR6 was built on December 12.

The VR6 retired from the American market after the 2023 model year when the Atlas went four-cylinder-only, but it lived on in China until a couple of days ago. The Q6, a Chinese-market crossover that’s related to the Atlas but isn’t sold in Europe or in the United States, was notably powered by a 2.5-liter VR6.

Volkswagen Golf VR6
Volkswagen

Like the Hemi V-8, which is living out its last months in the Dodge Durango, the VR6 was carried into the sunset by a family-friendly SUV. It’s a rather inglorious ending for an engine that was often synonymous with performance. It made its global debut at the 1991 Geneva auto show and was inaugurated by the Passat, though it quickly made its way to the Corrado, the Jetta, and, crucially, the third-generation Golf.

I’m highlighting the Golf due to the superstar status it enjoyed in the early 1990s. At the time, it was the reference point in the segment and the car that Volkswagen’s rivals used as a benchmark. Dropping a six-cylinder between its fenders widened the gap between the Golf and its rivals in terms of performance and prestige, and it would have been considerably more difficult to achieve with another layout.

Marketplace

Buy and sell classics with confidence

Browse Marketplace
Browse Marketplace

The VR6’s beauty is its packaging. It’s considerably narrower than a traditional V-6 because its cylinders are placed at an angle that ranges between 10.5 and 15 degrees; they notably share a head. And yet, it’s not a whole lot longer than a straight-four, and it’s much shorter than a straight-six. I don’t have a measuring tape and a third-generation Golf handy to double-check, but I’d bet a straight-six wouldn’t fit in the engine bay.

Volkswagen Vento VR6
Volkswagen AG

Context is useful here. Volkswagen offered two variants of the GTI for 1996. The entry-level model used a 2.0-liter four-cylinder rated at 115 horsepower and 122 pound-feet of torque. Next up was a 2.8-liter VR6 that posted figures of 172 and 177, respectively. If you’re a MK3 fan, you’re either on team four-cylinder or on team six-cylinder. I’m not here to settle the debate, and, yes, I’m aware that the VR6 was heavier. I’m merely standing on neutral ground to point out that the not-insignificant performance gap was the VR6’s appeal in an era when horsepower and top-speed figures still sold cars.

Early versions of the VR6 featured 12 valves and 2.8 liters of displacement. Displacement gradually grew to 2.9, 3.2, and eventually, 3.6 liters, and a 24-valve version made its debut in 1999. The various evolutions of the VR6 ended up powering a long and diverse list of cars that included the EuroVan, the New Beetle RSi, and the Touareg. The first-generation R32, which opened a new world of performance for the Golf, was powered by a 3.2-liter version of the VR6. Even the mighty Phaeton used a VR6 as its entry-level engine.

Bring a Trailer/steveceno1970

The VR6 wasn’t confined to the Volkswagen range. The original Audi TT and the first-generation Porsche Cayenne—two hugely significant cars for their respective manufacturer—were available with a 3.2-liter VR6. SEAT and Škoda used it, which you’d expect. Mercedes-Benz used it in the W638-generation V-Class, which you probably wouldn’t expect. Hell, there were forklifts and Winnebago RVs powered by the VR6!

Downsizing ultimately got the best of the VR6 in the Volkswagen range. In the early 1990s, the idea of a six-cylinder-powered Golf was exciting and a little exotic. In the early 2020s, it’s downright decadent. According to the brand, even the XL-sized Atlas doesn’t need a six-pot, so why bother designing a new VR6? We, along with VW fans across the globe, could think of a few reasons, but time marches on. Farewell, VR6, you’ll be missed.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: Barn Find Hunter: Dan Gurney’s Fabled ’61 Impala Returns Home

Comments

    It’s sad to see another 6 cylinder motor going away, only to be replace by a turbo 4 (maybe with hybrid) or turbo 3. Some of us would like the simplicity of a naturally aspirated 6.

    Meh, I was hoping to read that VW has built their last engine, and will be dissolved.

    If ever a car company deserved to be liquidated to pay reparations to their customers, it’s the wolves of Wolfsburg…

    I know the VR6 from our Eurovan based 2002 Winnebago Rialta. The engine has been relatively trouble free. It powers the 8,000 lb. RV to easily cruise at 75 mph where 18 mpg is not unheard of.

    The article almost seems to say that it was only available in the 1st gen Cayenne. Funny that my 2012 Cayenne has a 3.6 version residing in the engine bay. 300 HP and is sufficient for the type of driving that we use it for. Porsches other engine offerings that year will leave it in the dust in a drag race but it is also known to be the most trouble free of all the engines offered that year. No turbo, less to go wrong.

    If any of us old timers recall the Zager & Evans song, I’m starting to wonder, in the year 2525, if the surviving enjoyment of automotive technology will be reduced to autonomous disposable golf carts, and the ancient venerated automotive artifacts of our times will be as incomprehensible to the general public as Stonehenge and the pyramids of Egypt are to us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Please enter a valid email address

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.