Cadillac’s Celestiq is poised to recapture the standard of the world

Steven Pham

Like countless other companies, automotive and not, Cadillac wants an electric vehicle to make its greatness known. Fresh from a visit to GM’s Design Dome in Warren, Michigan, we can vouch for one thing: This EV ain’t like the others.

For starters, it’s $300,000. At minimum. If you’re upset by that figure, you aren’t the target audience. The Celestiq is a made-in-Detroit statement of ten-figure money. Regular folks can’t even visualize their dreams on an online configurator, in part because there is no set list of paints, leathers, fabrics, or finishes: Each car will be bespoke, the result of one-on-one interaction between the automaker and the customer. Plenty of manufacturers above Cadillac’s price point offer online visualizers—see Pagani—and also accommodate the most particular of client wishes, so take Caddy’s statement of exclusivity at face value. Not for you.

Boy, will you want one.

The car is imposing, a low-slung four-door whose graceful, lift-back proportions belie its massive size. Take a gander at the wheel diameter: 23 inches, one inch larger than those on the Escalade SUV. Yet the Celestiq sits comfortably on the giant rims, which are shod in custom, Cadillac-commissioned Michelins, their sidewalls embossed with a Celestiq-specific design.

The fluid surfacing and the precise creases in the car’s body subtlety signal the great expense of its construction. From the beltline down, front to rear, the car’s structure is comprised of eight pieces of sand-cast aluminum, whose rigidity mimics that of die-cast metal. The hood is a single sheet of delicately creased carbon fiber draped over the fenders to the headlights. The doors hide a short-range radar system that allowed designers to dismiss handles entirely: Walk up to the vehicle with the key in your pocket, and the door will either swing fully open or “present” an edge to you, depending on the proximity of pillars, walls, and other cars.

cadillac celestiq reveal logo emblem
Steven Pham

Even the brightwork bits are wildly impractical statements of excess. The metal “eyebrow” spanning the front of the car starts as a sheet of billet aluminum as wide as the car itself and almost a foot deep: The whole piece is brushed to a satin finish, then the front edge polished to a contrasting, higher sheen. The brushed metal that forms the rocker panel trim is an exposed piece of warm-formed aluminum that belongs to the car’s inner assembly. Traditionally, this would have been stamped, requiring it to be broken into four individual sections. Cadillac’s designers and engineers said no.

cadillac celestiq reveal profile
Steven Pham

The roof, each quadrant individually dimmable, is a single sheet of acoustically insulated glass. For it, Cadillac visited Peru, the site of the only foundry big enough to cast it in one piece. The Celestiq’s “grille” may not need to route air to a combustion engine, but Cadillac refused to spare expense: The blades that frame the headlights are stamped from aluminum, brushed, then accented with delicate polished texturing. The silver lines in the center section expose indium, the softest non-alkali metal chosen for its transparency to radar. 

cadillac celestiq reveal interior
Steven Pham

Peer inside—Cadillac isn’t yet allowing anyone to sit in this, its one and only prototype—and the show continues. The cabin is dominated by the car’s nearly flat waistline, a single contour that runs across the dash, continues through the doors, and sweeps behind the two rear chairs (there is no bulkhead) to meet the bottom of the liftgate’s glass. Designers and engineers suffered endless headaches to create it: “When we redid that speaker grille at the base of the A-pillar, we literally chased it all the way to the trunk,” says Tristan Murphy, Cadillac’s lead interior designer. Curved interior contours are useful in workaday cars because they disguise imperfections of line, but in the Celestiq’s linear cabin, there is no place to hide. Says the Celestiq’s lead engineer, Tony Roma: “The door pads have adjustability up, down, in, out in a way that I would get shot if I proposed doing it anywhere else. But we’re doing it here.”

cadillac celestiq reveal rear tallight side
Steven Pham

Those speaker grilles are, the team reflects, the largest Cadillac has ever made. Stamped out of aluminum, their holes are acid-etched before the whole panel is anodized, creating a dark finish that a laser precisely removes to create a 3-D effect. That curved glass panel on the dash fits two screens behind a single sheet of carefully bent glass measuring over four and a half feet, corner to diagonal corner. The floors are upholstered in leather, the cupholders in suede.

Lucid’s triple-motor, 1200-hp Sapphire boasts twice the horsepower of this dual-motor Cadillac, but if you’re comparing the two, you’re already on the wrong foot. Think of Bentley, and its “adequate” power: No one driving or being chauffeured in a Celestiq wants anyone to mistake them for a Tesla-esque blur. The Celestiq’s job isn’t to be the first high-tech EV, or even the most customizable Cadillac: It is to be Cadillac’s Veyron, a superlative, new-world interpretation of old-school prestige.

For nearly 80 years, Cadillac has again and again fallen prey to its own lofty condemnation, failing to equal or to excel. With the Celestiq, Detroit once again risks the penalty of leadership. For that alone, Cadillac deserves to live.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: First Look Review: 2023 CR-V gives Honda fans no reason to shop elsewhere

Comments

    OK, the styling is interesting, although I don’t really like the butt-end, but in a $300,000 luxury car, I would right off the bat expect something more from the seats. These look like they could have come out of a VEGA. I’m sure they are leather, and expensive to make, but there is nothing there that would want me to even sit in those seats.

    My Dad worked for GM his whole life, we never had a Cadillac though, just about every other brand, and from basic to plush models. While the technology may be cutting edge, I think this still needs some work.

    It’s so gaudily hideous that I thought it was a design exercise concept car. Yet again, Cadillac builds a car no one asked for. The rear hatch reminds me of 80’s coach style caddy’s that aged like milk.

    Swede cup holders? If I had read this on April 1st I would be laughing at the absurdity of the joke.

    Just might be the dumbest thing Cadillac has done since the lopped off 1/2 sized trunk of the early 70’s

    A $300K++ “hatchback”? Cadillac should have updated the lovely “Sixteen” concept car of a decade or so ago and put it into production FIRST to prepare the way before for ANY such breakthrough hyper-expensive high tech EV and styling gamble. Too many eggs put into one basket too soon?

    Mmmmm, Nope. A part of me can appreciate the nutso-unfettered construction details, but this whole woke-electric-emissions-falsehood sci-fi worship is ridiculous. For that kind money, I’d grab a few more choice musclecars, or come close to a Singer 911.

    I have a 2001 Deville I wouldn’t trade for this ugly car. I think Cadillac is trying to go out of business thinking that the government will bail them out.

    You’ve got to be kidding. For that price, I’d take a Maybach or Bentley or even RR, any day. And not electric please.

    Exactly. The kind of person that wants to be seen in a car this expensive is not going to choose a Cadillac – they’ll get a Bentley, a Rolls, or a Maybach.

    People build McMansions not to live in, but to be seen in. People buy expensive cars not to drive (few ever really are driven) and used as Cars, but to be seen in. R-R has a $400k status symbol. Cadillac now will have a $300k status symbol. Hypercars go for twice that, and those who buy them either don’t know how to drive them, of simply don’t hoping they will appreciate in monetary value. It is, as they say, what it is. But somehow it and the R-R don’t appear to be the sort of “car” that potential buyers dream of owning one day.

    From the side, kindof reminds me of a Dodge Magnum. I don’t think it’s as bad as everyone else, but I wouldn’t buy it, either. Especially not for $300,000 unless it come w/ a gorgeous Swedish girl! LOL!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.