7 Cars That Lost the Most Coin This Summer
We updated the Hagerty Price Guide last month, and “soft” is a word that keeps coming up. Most of our collector car indexes are down year-over-year, and some vehicles shed as much as 18 percent of their value. We’ve already highlighted some of the cars that lost the most in percentage terms, but below are some of the high-dollar classics that dropped the most in pure dollar terms. The bigger they are, the harder they fall, and all that.
As always, if you have questions about how we arrived at these changes, you can read more about the methodology behind the Hagerty Price Guide here.
1965–70 Aston Martin DB6 Vantage Coupe
Condition #2 decrease: -$58,900 (-11 percent)
Visually similar to the DB5 that came before it, the DB6 added four inches of wheelbase and a slightly higher roofline, resulting in a roomier Aston. The side profile also changed with the DB6’s Kammback tail and upward flourish at the very back. Mechanically the DB6 is largely the same, with the Tadek Marek-designed 4.0-liter six mated to either a ZF five-speed manual or Borg-Warner three-speed auto. In base form the triple SU-carbureted DB6 is rated at 282 horsepower, while the hot DB6 to have was the Vantage version, in which the triple Weber-fed engine makes 325 hp. British magazine Motor called the DB6 Vantage “a very Grand Tourer” that “makes the overall speed limit of 70 mph look ridiculous.”
In the DB6 value hierarchy, the ultra-rare Vantage convertibles and base model convertibles are worth the most, each coming in at over $1M in excellent condition. Coupes, even Vantages, are worth less than half as much, and while all DB6s got cheaper this past quarter, Vantage coupes sank the most. Weak sales, including a high number of cars in mediocre condition hitting the auction market over the past few years, have kept DB6 prices soft.
1973–75 BMW 3.0CSL Batmobile
Condition #2 decrease: -$86,700 (-18 percent)
Launched in 1972, the 3.0 CSL improved upon BMW’s already solid E9 platform with lighter weight and more power, and nearly 1300 were built to homologate it for European Touring Car Championship racing. A lighter body, less trim, and Perspex side windows dropped weight. In 1973, things improved further with a bump in displacement to 3.2 liters and an aero package with a massive air dam, an even bigger rear wing, a small roof spoiler, and fins along the front fenders. BMW didn’t call this version the “Batmobile,” but the nickname has stuck with the car ever since.
BMW also didn’t sell this car in the U.S., but American Bimmer-heads have lusted after it for long enough that a decent number of them have made it to this side of the Atlantic. And, as classic BMW prices in general have appreciated significantly during the 2010s and 2020s, so has the Batmobile. From 2013-23, the condition #2 value of this car essentially tripled. Last year, however, was the peak, and sale prices have been soft. Since then, #2 values have sunk by 27 percent.
1955–57 Mercedes-Benz 300Sc Cabriolet
Condition #2 decrease: -$87,000 (-11 percent)
Part of the W188 generation of Mercedes-Benz, the 300Sc is quite rare with 98 coupes, 49 Cabriolet As, and 53 roadsters built. They are magnificent hand-built cars that retain some of that prewar coach-built streamlined elegance, but combine it with advanced postwar features like independent suspension and a fuel-injected engine similar to the one found in Mercedes’ 300SL sports car. In fact, a 300Sc actually cost more than a 300SL when both cars were new.
Not so now. In fact, 300Sc prices have been consistently dropping for nearly a decade, and two recent sales for the rare cabriolet models don’t show that trend reversing. A solid example sold this summer for $582,500, which is under its condition #4 (“fair”) value, and another brought even less at £368,000 ($477,885).
1963–64 Alfa Romeo TZ-1
Condition #2 decrease: -$150,000 (-9 percent)
Alfa Romeo’s racing successor to the Giulietta Sprint Zagato (SZ), the Tubolare Zagato (TZ) features a lightweight tube (tubolare) frame and an aluminum body by, you guessed it, Zagato. These days, people refer to it as the TZ-1 to distinguish it from the much rarer fiberglass-bodied TZ-2 that replaced it. Its distinctive Kamm tail (the Italians call it a coda tronca, or “shortened tail”) and curvy shape make it gorgeous, and it truly is light, weighing in at under 1500 pounds. TZ-1s were highly competitive in their class in the great sports car races of the day, and Alfa Romeo built just 112 of them.
With cars this rare, individual sales can swing price guide numbers significantly. Although prices high-end 1960s sports cars in general were soft this past quarter, one auction result for a TZ-1 made the case for dropping this Italian favorite’s value by six figures. An aged but good car in #3+ condition sold in Monterey back in August for $819,000. While 819 grand is a lot of money, it’s well under the car’s $1M presale estimate, and less than the TZ-1’s condition #4 value in our Price Guide.
1960–63 Aston Martin DB4 GT
Condition #2 decrease: -$450,000 (-14 percent)
Introduced in late 1959, the same year Aston Martin won overall at Le Mans, the DB4 GT is shorter, lighter, and more powerful than the standard DB4. Its wheelbase is about five inches shorter, its body made of thinner-gauge aluminum, and its engine tweaked with higher compression, twin-plug ignition, and three Weber carburetors to bump power from 240 to 302 hp. Visually, the DB4 GT is most distinguishable by its handsome faired-in, covered headlights, a feature Aston Martin later adopted on the DB4 Vantage and the DB5. Other details include quick-release fuel fillers for the large fuel tank and Borrani wire wheels.
DB4 GTs mixed it up on track with Ferrari 250 TdFs and SWBs (more about those below) and had considerable success. Aston Martin built 75 of them, and 19 more received lighter, curvier bodywork from Zagato in Italy.
Like the Alfa TZ, this is another scarcely seen ’60s sports car, and sometimes just one sale can precede a big price swing. One such sale happened in Monterey back in August, where a DB4 GT in #2- condition sold for $2.1M, which was condition #3- money, or about half a million less, at the time.
1956–59 Ferrari 250 GT Tour de France
Condition #2 decrease: -$700,000 (-11 percent)
Ferrari won the Tour de France automobile race eight times between 1951 and 1964, and the company even nicknamed the long wheelbase, competition version of its 250 GT the “Tour de France” (TdF) after it won the event in 1956.
TdFs are among the most valuable and sought after of all classic Ferraris, so when their prices drop, a lot of dollars (700K of them, in this case) are shed. Vintage Ferraris in general had a tough go of it this past quarter. A TdF posted a soft $5.2M in Monterey, and Hagerty’s Ferrari index saw its biggest drop in over four years.
1959–63 Ferrari 250 GT SWB
Condition #2 decrease: -$800,000 (-10 percent)
The 250 GT SWB (Short Wheelbase) is an evolution of the successful 250 GT TdF and the predecessor of the famous 250 GTO, as well as a highly successful racing car in its own right. It has long been one of the most valuable classic cars in the world, and alloy-bodied examples can sell for eight figures. Given the soft market for 1950s and 1960s Ferraris this past quarter, though, the most valuable ones were bound to drop along with the rest of them.
Notice how it’s all euro trash junk
Exactly….never a fan of ANY Euro vehicles…too many headaches and any mechanic or parts store can see you coming..who needs it.
“Euro trash” says much more about the speaker than it does about the object of the speech. For every great American car that we pedestal, there are many more that qualify as “Ameri trash” – Pinto, Vega, Cimarron, Mustang GTCS…
i’ve taken pics of that bat mobile at larz in brookline, MA. It looks better with a different set of wheels he sometimes has on it when he goes to car shows.
Cars that stimulate an emotional desire to own and drive will always attract those that have the ability to pay whatever it takes to own and drive such cars. The cost is a secondary factor…perhaps not a factor at all.
Considering that almost all used cars dropped around 10% this is simply following same trends.
No big surprise. They were over bought and over hyped to a generation in decline to begin with. As with all older classic cars their value declines with the age of the generation who had a desire for them.
I’d rather see articles on restored autos being used as daily drivers (not trailer queens) than cars I’ll never be able to afford.
Anybody who doesn’t check the price of recommended services for these cars before okaying with a repair shop deserves what they get. Just sayin’.
I could not afford the insurance on any of them–but then it would just sit in my garage because I would be afraid a rock might dent it.
I agree with a good number of the comments others have made. I believe the age of collector cars (and their owners) also has a lot to do with their present day value. Take a look at the 55 through 57 T-Birds. I see many out there now selling for $25K to $30K in what I’ll call “local car show” condition. Why? The generation that worshiped them is literally dying so the demand is lower now. Those cars were seldom driven by my generation as I was too young to drive in that era and I’m now in my mid 60s. My belief is that American muscle cars from the 60s and newer appeal to a much broader age group and………. parts are much easier to come by and often reproduced. Hard to get parts for rare foreign or pre-60s cars (with a some exceptions).
Well said, at the local shows most people viewing the cars are not collectors. They are drawn to cars they were fond of as kids or young adults. Some cars like my 65 Mustang convertible, draw attention from all ages. My son used to work on those 7 figure Ferraris one was a 62 250 GTO, Alfas and Aston Martin. Hard to find parts are in country of origin with people who don’t speak English. He left that world to build hot rods.
Price doesn’t matter unless you are looking to sell. I see an ad in Hagerty magazine for a company that is an investment fund in cars. Special interest cars should NOT be considered an investment, but should be a PASSION. If you are looking to make money on cars, you are likely to be sorely disappointed.
The by-line should read, Foreign cars dropped 10%, and then go on to write a story about something interesting. We know you can do it.
Headline is different than “by-line.” When you understand the two maybe someone will take your opinion seriously.
Let’s not forget the impact of the artificially low interest rates we had for quite some time. I would love to do a review of the loan portfolios held by the various finance companies that specialize in financing collector cars. My feeling has always been if you need to finance a collector car you really shouldn’t be buying one.
While the article was interesting it only proves to me that an entry level classic car guy like me is not who Hagerty is writing this and most of their magazine articles for.
Maybe you could remember who 75% of your customers are. How about an article or two on some of the things that the lower end cars and owners would like.
Most of us are not driving anything close to what you write about, not remotely close. The no where near perfect car people are the closed thing to the beginnings of hot rods.
When I take my wife for a cruise, we call it the mystery run , the mystery being whether we make it home.
It is no wonder that not many young people are driving anything remotely classic and a lot of us older guys also.
Craig
Hi Craig, appraciate the feedback on featuring more affordable stuff. While we do try to cater to everyone’s tastes, it is good to keep that in perspective. We do try to feature less high-end and main stream vehicles and put out enough stories that they can’t be fit on the weekend newsletter, many of them featuring less expensive cars.
We call it a misery tour Craig, we just got back from one, but its ok, we were close enough to home to walk.
Give me an original old truck that I can drive daily and enjoy (and sometimes haul stuff). Cars that are tomb dwellers are of little interest. I want a vehicle I can enjoy, not brag about! Affordable, repairable and still attract attention!
Couldn’t care less how much up or down my two cars go. They’re both keepers and not for sale.