Why gas guzzlers make sense (again)

Ford

As I write this, the price of regular unleaded is hovering around $5 a gallon. Diesel is about a buck a gallon more. All of this is headline news on a daily basis. Fuel prices are affecting every industry, every business, and every consumer.

Yet as of late, buyers seem to be fighting over some immense, heavy-duty, sub–15-mpg gas-guzzling SUVs. Some are even selling for many multiples of what they did a few years ago, when fuel cost a fraction of what it does now. But the people buying these things (including yours truly) might be on to something.

Here I’ve focused on two gas-guzzlers with ever-increasing cult followings: The 2000–05 Ford Excursion and the 1998–2007 Toyota Land Cruiser.

The longest, heaviest mass-produced SUV ever, the Excursion was essentially an F-250 Super Duty wagon. With the optional V-10 gas or Power Stroke diesel engines, they tow up to 11,000 pounds. Never mind how many people, pets, and suitcases you can stuff inside an Excursion at the same time.

2003 Ford Excursion rear cargo
Ford

J100-series Land Cruisers, however, are not 3/4-ton pickup-based towing machines. Nor do they offer a variety of drivetrain choices. But they do have Toyota’s silky-smooth 4.7-liter V-8 and full-time 4WD. And they were built to last forever. Literally.

The average combined fuel economy for these trucks is about 14 mpg. But their collective inefficiency hasn’t seemed to slow down values. In the past 36 months, Excursion prices are up an average of 46 percent, while J100s are up 85 percent. More telling is the fact that both of these had heavy Gen X demand until the past 24 months, when millennial (and younger) interest came on strong.

J100 Land Cruiser Front Three-Quarter
Toyota

Here’s why I think this is happening. First, they just don’t make stuff like this anymore. There were no hybrid powertrains, no kowtowing to CAFE standards, no considerations beyond just being rugged and unapologetic in their mission. Both are old enough to be “cool,” but not so old that they aren’t usable in today’s world.

Then there’s the COVID factor. These are vehicles that allow people to load up the whole family, tow the Airstream, and head out to places that help you forget about reality for a weekend or four. That’s especially attractive to millennial buyers looking to introduce their young kids to something beyond screen time. The work-from-home phenomenon also plays into this, because you can work from that camping spot.

Additionally, there’s a certain satisfaction to the analog feel of these machines—an unplugged vibe with no LCDs and no lane-keep assist or other electronic nannies constantly dinging at you.

As for that awful fuel mileage, let’s pencil that out. A new $52,000 Chevy Tahoe gets 16 mpg combined. A new $39,000 Grand Cherokee is rated at 23 mpg. Driving 10,000 miles in a year, the difference between a 14-mpg rig and a 23-mpg rig equates to about 279 gallons. At $5 a gallon, that’s an extra $1395 a year. Factor in the significant savings in the purchase price, and the additional fuel cost doesn’t seem insane.

2020 Ford Expedition Limited
Ford

Which is why I recently decided to replace our 2020 Ford Expedition with a “vintage” Excursion. The Expedition is a fine vehicle, but a boat or car trailer of any significance drops its comfy independent rear suspension to its knees, and towing in crosswinds was, um, more exciting than I expected. So I went on an Excursion excursion and landed on a clean, 50,000-mile 2000 Limited with the V-10. I paid $27,000 for it. Since then, I’ve done some needed maintenance and installed new tires. I’m currently in the truck for about $35K. We’ve put 2000 miles on it so far, primarily pulling a trailer to my son’s go-kart races every week, which it does as admirably as hoped. Thanks to the towing, I haven’t broken into double-digit fuel mileage yet, but the tank is big, so the refueling intervals don’t rub my nose in their thirst.

I have to say, I’m pleased with the decision to step back 22 years of refinement and technology for a rig that better fits my needs. Who says whistling past the graveyard isn’t rewarding?

Gas Guzzler vehicle values infographic
Hagerty

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it.

This article first appeared in Hagerty Drivers Club magazine. Click here to subscribe and join the club.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: New Supra GT4 priced at $184,263, best of BMW at auction, Caterham says Seven is safe
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    I’ll keep my 20 year old Honda Insight that routinely knocks off more than 70 MPG and once dipped to 59.9 during a brutally cold sub-zero winter fill and is just a few months away from turning over 300,000 miles. It was high mileage when I bought it and has been more reliable than my last new car. The car is basically free from gas savings alone about 2.5 times over, so it’s actually paid for itself and more.

    Loved the article. I’m of the same mindset. I currently own a 2001 F-250 with the indestructible 7.3 Powerstroke., 6 speed manual transmission, crew cab and 8 foot bed. I paid over 34K a couple of years ago and it’s worth every penny. May I point out the 34K is a lot less than the trucks of today cost.

    I have a 2004 excursion with the 5.4 v8. Love the truck and gets 16-17 mpg highway. Not bad for being that big. It is also a 2wd

    we have a 2001 GMC Sierra C3 with a 6L and over 300kkm on it and still pulls great
    had over 500kkm on our 1992 suburban

    I had been thinking about selling my 2000 F-250 V-10 and getting something smaller with better gas mileage . HOWEVER…..After reading these articles I`ve seen that I would be making a HUGE mistake and would really miss my Ol Girl. She has 98 k on her and only Normal maintenance for her so far. She has been to Glacier pulling a sizeable 5th whl. Nove Scotia and to the West coast . A truck camper , a boat hauler as well as mulch hauler. Seeing all the comments has changed my outlook and am keeping My Gal . Thank you for the eye opener.

    Heck yes! After buying and driving dozens of used cars along with my new Tacoma my father presented me with the opportunity to purchase his one-owner 2001 Yukon XL. After years of daydreaming of this day I said “Heck yes!”. Just installed the custom license plate with it’s official name “Yukiwan”. Love the analog feel, fact that I can run all or some of the window wide open without blowing my eardrums out, and lackluster radio. Yukiwan will be pulling our 13-year old family camper across the country for years to come.

    Hi Colin!!
    totally agree. My 2004 H2 Hummer is basically a 3/4 tom short wheel base Chevy Pickup with a funny body. I have 160,000 miles on it and never have changed the brakes or repaired any suspension issues. it still runs and drive great even with several tows between Seattle and Tucson, As you stated, 12 miles a gallon towing or not. My son just spent $6,700 on suspension repairs on a 2017 GMC with 65,000 miles and never towed anything. Fixem, don’t replace them!

    That older gas guzzler makes even more sense if you live in Kentucky. Kentucky charges you an annual tax at the rate of 31.5 cents per hundred dollars of value. If you have a hybrid the state tacks on an extra $75 each year and a full electic vehicle gets an added $150 each year. AND YOU WILL PAY THAT 31.5 CENTS PER $100 WORTH OF APPRAISED VALUE FOR EVERY YEAR YOU OWN THAT TRUCK. So do the math. You purchase a $52,000 Chevy you will pay $3,120 in sales tax. The used Expedition at $27,000 will require you to pay $1,620 sales tax. Nex year you will pay the avaloem tax on the Chevy in the amount of $163.80. The ad valoem tax on the Ford will be $85.05 That Chevy will cost you $1,705.05 more than the older Ford even if you don’t drive it one mile. At $5.00 a gallon and 10 miles per gallon you can drive an extra 3400 miles in the old Ford whlle that new Chevy sits in the garage and decreases in value.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *