8 1960s Classics With Faces We Can’t Help but Love

Chevrolet

We blame the weather. While the staff of this website calls many places in the United States (and overseas) home, the lion’s share of our editors are located somewhere in the Midwest. And right now, dear reader, the Midwest weather is volatile as hell.

Naturally, we turned to internal discussions about cars to cope with a week where temperatures fluctuated by as much as 50 degrees and weather patterns swung from rain to sun to snow and back again.

This time around, we got to talking about the ’60s, one of our hobby’s indisputable golden eras. That led to discussions about front-end design, and how radically different it was from automaker to automaker. In short order, many of us began campaigning for certain cars with front ends that stuck in our hearts and minds, for one reason or another.

Compiled here is a list of eight such cars. Beneath each nominee is a brief summary of why it warrants appreciation, made by each car’s loudest proponent in the (chat)room.

Rules? Delightfully few. The car had to be built at some point in the ’60s, and beyond that, it was up to each of us to make the case. Naturally, such a loose mission brief will have let many great cars slip through the cracks. Got one that should have made this list? Let fly in the comments below!

1968 Chevrolet El Camino

1968 Chevrolet El Camino front closeup red
Chevrolet

If your first thought was that the face of the ’68 ElCo is virtually the same as that of the Chevelle, allow our own Cameron Neveu to offer the most compelling—if a bit unorthodox—case for picking the former:

“Why the El Camino over the identical appearing 1968 Chevelle? Well, the ElCo front end looks even sweeter knowing you’ve got a bed out back.”

An open and shut case, in our eyes. The 1968 model’s four round headlights make it extra distinct, and while the performance fan in us enjoys the SS badge between those four eyes, there’s something about the long, horizontal Chevy emblem that we can’t resist.

1968 Citroën DS

Citroen DS 21 front three quarter
Citroën

The DS pops up in all sorts of design lists, and for good reason. Those swooping body lines were quite brave for the era, and who could forget the high-tech hydraulic suspension that gave the car a magic carpet-like ride, helping to accentuate the design details that seemed to float over the blacktop? But the nose is worth celebrating on its own. As U.K. correspondent Nik Berg reminded us, if you sound out the DS title with a thick enough French accent, you’ll hear “Deésse,” which just happens to be French for “goddess.”

The big, wide headlights at either corner, contrasted with the waterfall of the hood in the middle, the exceedingly convex chrome bumper, and the lack of a grille make this front end as striking as they come.

1965 Buick Riviera

1965 Buick Riviera front end
Buick

If the front end of a car were to be described as “very Teddy Roosevelt-esque,” could you picture it? In a single sentence, Eddy Eckart swayed the jury in his favor: “Simple, and formal in a means business kind of way, all without being too assertive.”

Gaze upon the forward cant of those headlamps; marvel at the buttresses flanking the massive hood. “The Riviera looks like a concept car that actually made it to production,” added Brandan Gillogly. There’s a reason this car is a popular choice for custom builders and restomod specialists, and it has everything to do with how the Riv’ manages to speak softly, while … well, you know the rest.

1966 Alfa Romeo Giulia Duetto Spider

Alfa Romeo Spider 1600 Duetto Pininfarina
Pininfarina

If the Riviera is an American sledgehammer, Stefan Lombard nominated a delicate Italian pickaxe to contrast it. While it’s hard to find a bad angle of the Giulia Duetto Spider, the car’s clean, simple face manages to avoid the “mouth-agape fish” look that so many small cars of the time suffered from.

He also noted that while many cars look great from a front 3/4 angle, it can be harder to make the head-on view sing. In the Duetto’s case, Lombard had this to say: “The sloping nose and covered headlights lead into that delicate V grille, which flows back beneath the car. I love it.” Hard to argue with that!

1969 Chevrolet Corvette

1969 Chevrolet Corvette front make arches
Mecum

The chrome front bumper the third-gen Corvette stuck around through 1972, but since the design debuted in 1968, it counts. Resident Corvette fanatic Grace Houghton opted to shout out the 1969 model, and we didn’t need any additional convincing. Two beautifully high fenders dip down to a broad chrome bar that spans the width of the car’s face. Below the bumper, two rectangular inlets, each housing a round turn signal bulb. The look, as Houghton so eloquently put it, “manages to look muscular and delicate at the same time … So Mako Shark, and so good.”

Bonus points if we’re looking at a ’69 L88, with its massive hood bulge shrouding a 427 big-block.

1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1

1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 front three-quarter
Aaron McKenzie

Though it’s easy to blur the lines, it bears repeating that “muscle cars” and “pony cars” were not always the same things. When it debuted in April of 1964, the Mustang was a relatively docile thing. The front end might be famous now, but that has more to do with what the Mustang has become in automotive culture than it does with how it looks on its own.

That look began to change almost immediately, as our resident Ford guru Sajeev Mehta reminded us. By 1969, the Mustang’s face had gone from cheerful companion to something far more sinister. As Mehta put it: “The 1969 Mustang took the hum-drum front end of the 1965 model and made it deeper, more aggressive, and far more angry. It became half muscle car and half pony car.”

1963 Studebaker Avanti

1963 Studebaker Avanti R2 front three-quarter
Mecum

Though I’ll admit it’s not my favorite front end from the 1960s, there’s something distinctive and instantly recognizable about the Studebaker Avanti that warrants respect. Those perfectly round headlights seem like they should flank a broad grille, but instead, it’s just solid bodywork. That decision highlights the offset futuristic-script “Avanti” emblem that proudly proclaims the model’s identity. The fenders end in sharp corners, framing the simplicity of the grille-less countenance. You can’t help but appreciate designer Raymond Loewy’s flair for the dramatic.

“Counter-point, there should be a grille between this headlights and this nominee is actually bad.” – Stefan Lombard

Well, that’s just like, your opinion, man.

1968 Dodge Charger R/T

1968 Dodge Charger R T Hemi Mecum
Mecum

Fret not, Mopar fans, our site’s executive editor has you covered. Eric Weiner was swift and decisive with his nominee, the ’68 Charger. That broad, mail-slot rectangle of a grille is immediately recognizable. Hidden headlights add a menacing tone to the front end, and this is one of the few cars that makes a large front overhang look attractive.

This rectangular motif also carries over onto the new Dodge Charger. Anytime a front end’s design elements can look attractive in two distinctly different eras, you know you’ve got a winner in your hands.

***

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters

Read next Up next: Our Two Cents: The Car Industry’s Worst Predictions

Comments

    Rather than the ’68 El Camino; I think the ’66 Chevelle and El Camino were much better looking.
    I also believe you missed on the ’69 Camaro RS front end.
    Another really good front was the ’69 Chrysler 300.
    Ditto the ’69 Coronet.
    Double ditto the ’65 Pontiac Tempest, Lemans, GTO.
    No XKE? Kind missed the boat on that one. Unless you were just looking for the best looking obscure cars from the 60’s?
    So many others… ’68 Monaco, ’64 Bonneville, ’65 GT350H…

    Most of these I would agree with. I never really liked the 1968/69 Malibu/El Camino frontend (or the body style in general); I would pick the 1967 Malibu “wall-to-wall” frontend specifically, as being better-looking.

    That Citroen frontend is as strange now as it was then. “Striking”? Yes – but not especially attractive.

    The 1969 Mustang frontend was nice, but I prefer the 1970.

    The Avanti always looks like it has had too much caffeine.

    And as others may have suggested, the 1967/1968 Cougar frontends would be good additions to this list, as well as the covered-headlight versions of the XK-E and the Fiat 850 Spider.

    I cannot believe you left out the 60’s GTO’s as they outclassed all of the ones on your list in terms of front end especially 65-67 and also full side Pontiacs 60-65

    OK – so now how about cars with “faces we can’t help but hate” or “make me barf”?

    I would like to nominate Tesla.
    You would think with the ability to do almost any kind of styling that Tesla would come up with something so much better.
    It looks like Elon’s face after dental surgery.

    A great example of “to each his own”…I love 67-69 Camaros, think the hidden headlamp options were ugly as heck. Many folks love them. Always thought the Chargers with hidden lights looked like an electric razor. Jag XKE hard to fault, also like 65-66 GT-350…as for the Citroen, love ‘em, they’re supposed to be weird.

    I woulda nuked the Chevelle’s for the 427 street Cobra.
    ’69 Mushtang for ’67 Shebly (inner driving lights please).
    ’68 Charger for the ’66 Charger OR ’67 Cougar GTE.

    (mikedrop)

    You lost me on the Avanti. That thing is homely.

    But the ’65 Riviera is a work of art. Bill Mitchell could have dropped the mic after that.

    1967 my girlfriends dad , a Ford dealer parts man, drove a 65 champagne colored Rivi , a gorgeous car and it drove the dealer owner crazy. He always parked in front of the show room, and the bosses view. He loved sticking to the old man.

    Pretty subjective: marque prejudices, domestic vs. import prejudices, price-range prejudices, etc. all come into play in the article and comments. “A difference of opinion is what makes a horse race” said Mark Twain, and he was usually spot-on! I was enthralled by the Gen 3 ‘Vette and Gen 2 Charger then; have sketches to prove it, but now, only so-so. 1963 Gran Prix, ’65 GTO/LeMans, Gen 2 Corvair (handicapped is it is without a conventional ‘face’, early Toronados (much nicer than Riv of either iteration, to me), Gen 2 Barracuda coupes (wow!), ’63 Galaxie ‘fast-back’ coupe, and…
    Not the Mustang, Citroen, and toss in ’60 Dodge, all Chevy II’s, ’65 Galaxie, most Imperials 1958-64, and Citroen 2CV, just to be international. Just sayin’… Wick

    To the Avanti haters out there, please acquire some taste.

    It is in the same “minimalist” league as the ’61 – Lincolns, and perhaps the DS and Porsche 911.

    Another nomination….Jeep…yes, not ’60s but neither is the DS in its better, more “pure” single headlight form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.