Our Two Cents: Cars we would kill, if we could

Public Domain

Welcome to this week’s episode of Our Two Cents, a series where we ask the staff here at Hagerty Media random questions about automobiles. Our folks spend far too much time every day thinking about cars, so it’s only fair to ask them the following question: What car would you kill and why?

Our answers are just as diverse as our interests, so have a look!

Don’t cross over

2024 Buick Encore GX Avenir
Buick

I would kill every single egg-shaped “crossover” vehicle simply because they’re hideous (see: Buick Encore). Do I need to expand on this? I feel like everyone should agree with this. They’re ugly as sin and shouldn’t exist. — Ben Woodworth

Toyota Prius, etc.

Any Prius before the latest version, and I’d also nominate the Smart car. Oh, and can I also throw those pedal-powered jitney bus/bicycle bar contraptions onto the fire? They go a whopping 5 mph on Woodward Avenue in Detroit, blocking traffic on a Sunday afternoon with a bunch of suburbanites hootin’ and hollerin’. — Todd Kraemer

Make like a tree and leaf

Nissan

Nissan Leaf. The first one had such an opportunity to make a splash but was instead the ugliest car of the 21st century. The name is too stained by that mistake and should go away. Larry Webster

Dropping the droptop

Chrysler

I vote for the last Chrysler Sebring convertible. Once I leaned over to use the lever to move the passenger seat back, and the entire seat bottom came away in my hand. Which is okay in a Boeing 737, but not a psuedo-luxe convertible. Steven Cole Smith

Flamed out on flame surfacing

2002 BMW 7 Series front three quarter
BMW

In an alternate universe, the 2002–2005 BMW 7 series (E65) woulda ended life as nothing more than a clay model. If so, the Bangle butt and that expensive-to-make (yet dumpy-looking) interior would have never let BMW slide into the convoluted, complex, and borderline offensive BMWs we see today. Sajeev Mehta

No Eco, no Sport … no thanks!

2021 Ford EcoSport Ford

Ford EcoSport. It’s basically a Ford Fiesta on stilts that costs many thousands more but has the same unpleasant interior. It’s just a hateful little crossover that was as uncompetitive as it was unattractive. It was more ponderous than the tight-handling Fiesta, but the real gut-punch was that the EcoSport arrived right around the time Ford said it would kill all non-SUV cars except the Mustang. Eric Weiner

You are not us?

lamborghini urus s
Lamborghini

I was going to say the Ford EcoSport, but it looks like that one has been spoken for. (Put me down as seconding that motion, however.) So instead, I’ll turn my attention to the Lamborghini Urus. I don’t really care that it’s become the brand’s best-selling vehicle basically overnight. I don’t care that it’s a cash machine. I don’t care that Porsche was the first of those holdout sports-car marques to worship at the SUV altar. Porsche is German, which means logic reigns supreme. Of course there was going to be an SUV.

Lamborghini? It’s Italian. (This is the part where you guys “WELL ACKSHUALLY” me about the VW Group’s ownership and the parts sharing. Save it—I’m on a roll here.)

The whole brand is emotion and sex and things worried parents try to pray away. It’s crass, joyous, spiteful defiance of logic and reservation. The Urus feels like none of that. Nathan Petroelje

Fry the oil-burner

Oldsmobile

This is such a fun game of the “butterfly effect” for me: I’ll think of one car that I would love to smite and, just a second later, realize that without that car we wouldn’t have something else. I thought of at least three despicable models that had positive implications in the marketplace. That said, I wish all the 1978–85 GM diesel cars never happened.

Those cars and the stories that spiraled from them put a bad taste in the mouths of so consumers when it came to diesel engines—a bad taste that was largely undeserved. If buyers would have received diesel cars that functioned properly and were actually thought-through, I think history would have changed. For good or bad I don’t know, but it’s hard to argue things wouldn’t have taken a different path. Kyle Smith

Adios, Tin Lizzie

Mecum

Channeling my inner Loki, I’d adopt the “agent of chaos” role for this scenario and I’d kill the Ford Model T. It would be interesting to see what the automotive landscape would look like today in its absence. Stefan Lombard

Kill every icon!

Ford

Ooooh … if we’re doing chaos theory, let’s also kill the Tucker (no safety innovations), the Beetle (no VW or Porsche), the Mustang (no pony car wars), and the GTO (no muscle cars). Maybe the Corolla (no foreign cars made in the U.S.)? — Todd Kraemer

***

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: There’s nothing like seeing a Duesenberg in person
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    Chevette
    Yugo
    … and every other car that was marketed as being affordable but wound up being disposable.

    My list-
    1- Anything electric. Mainjy tesla, they started this ignorant garbage
    2- The 88 redesign of GM pickups. That was the beginning of the end for trucks built like trucks (IFS on 4wds, fords TTB was atleast durable)
    3-Anything that doesnt have a V8 north of 6 liters.

    I LOVE the 80’s GM diesels! I have two of them right now. They get a bad rap from people who don’t know the real cause of the problems. The engineers made a couple correctable mistakes like using torque-to-yield head bolts and not including a proper fuel filter/water separator (the gasket technology at the time was not great either). But the marketing department not wanting to educate the consumer on proper maintenance for fear it would drive away customers, and the service side not educating the technicians properly ( many re-used the head bolts when replacing gaskets) was just as culpable. Combine that with the low quality diesel fuel available at the time and people using SI designated oil in a CI engine caused the perfect storm for failure. With Multi-layer steel head gaskets, ARP head studs, and a proper fuel filter/water separator I have had very good service from these engines and great mileage for my big cars.

    1979 & up Pontiac Trans-Am. Kill them with fire. Also those 1994-2004 Mustangs how miserable of a car can you produce?

    The Leaf is not the ugliest car of this century by far. That distinction belongs to the Juke, followed closely by the original B9 Tribeca.
    Why do some Tesla’s have a flat spot inviting a grill, similar to the Caravelle? I prefer that to everyone whose grills just keep getting larger while nothing else changes.

    Any Lexus built after 2012. Front end designs are hideous. I’ll keep my 2012 LS460 till the wheels come off.

    The Fod Model T put Americans on wheels listing it is a nonsense from historical stand point

    About the Lambo Urus at least it’s design is not as ridiculous as the Bentley and Rolls counterparts, basically both being a fridge on wheels.

    I can’t believe nobody has mentioned the Nissan cube. I read somewhere the designer is in a insane asylum laughing uncontrollably playing with children’s wooden blocks.

    @Todd Kramer… kill the GTO?! Oooooo! Agent of chaos indeed!! 😵😂

    Fun article, interesting opinions. Thanks!

    Thanks for not including the Pontiac Aztec. It was poorly made but was really fun to own. Maybe that’s your next title, What was fun to own, ignoring everything else about it?

    I totally agree that Crossovers/SUVs are hideous and simply ugly. They all look the same. There is absolutely no redeeming qualities with them. Many look like they were put into a vice and it was tightened. I simply wish this fad would die and die quickly!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *