Media | Articles
Our Two Cents: Best-Looking SUV from the Back?
Validation is a wonderful feeling, as sometimes our thoughts on automobiles (and car culture, to a larger extent) resonate with our readers in specific ways. The question you see above may sound far-fetched, but a thought exercise about the best-looking SUV posterior was given to us by a reader named Mark. And we thank him for that!
“How about asking a question about the best looking SUV from the back? (Current models only.) I just saw an ugly Mercedes with too much going on back there.”
Our internal chat got a little out of hand, so I decided to include both crossover utility vehicles (CUVs) and concept vehicles. Well, only one concept vehicle that could make production. Perhaps you can tell why we all want one particular vehicle to make production so badly? Tell us what you think in the comments.
Please Make The Rivian R3X
“For whatever reason, it seems like EVs have the best modern rear-end designs. I think the back of the Rivian R3X is awesome, and I really hope they build it. It’s the right combo of modern styling while subtly (or not so subtly?) paying homage to the Lancia Delta Integrale, one of my favorite vehicles of all time. The ride height and stance of it from the rear just make it look extra fun.
If you’re forcing me to pick an SUV/CUV that currently in production, then I’ll have to say—and I’m surprising myself with this decision—the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally.
I have always thought those Mustang taillights are cool. That, the big stupid wing, and the racing stripes just do it for me. Can you tell I’m a fan of rally-inspired vehicle design?” — Ben Woodworth
Marketplace
Buy and sell classics with confidence
This might be a stretch since it isn’t in production, but the Rivian R3 expertly channels Lancia Delta while looking appropriately modern. It’s neither generic blob nor “look at me, I’m cosplaying as an off-roader,” and mmm, the proportions are just right.
I don’t usually care for SUVs, but the R3 had me staring at my screen for a long while when it was revealed.” — Eddy Eckart
We’d Also Like A Production Scout Traveler
“If pre-production vehicles are in, I’ve got to mention the Scout Traveler. The way the spare tire carrier is integrated is nice, but the shape of the D-pillar is just a great homage to the Scout II, even though the original Traveler didn’t have that instantly recognizable rear window shape.” — Brandan Gillogly
HiPhi X … X-cept?
“I pick the HiPhi X, because it’s a CUV that does so much once you cross the B-pillar. Granted, they stole the concept from the Tesla Model X and its falcon doors, but the implementation looks far less complicated and is likely more durable/reliable. The only problem is that HiPhi is a Chinese company, which means it has little hope of selling products in America. And then I recently googled them to learn they are likely declaring bankruptcy.
Sigh, let me try this again.
Yep, I still love the Hyundai Ioniq 5’s pixelated rear styling. The photos Cameron Neveu took for my story back in 2022 still hold up three years later. 8-bit car design may not take over the world like tail fins or gaping maw front ends, but these pictures tell a thousand words of positivity. And it’s practical and functional, too.” — Sajeev Mehta
The Iconic Range Rover
“My vote is for the range-topping Range Rover: Elegant, simple, substantial, and it evokes all the feelings.” — Joe DeMatio
Or The Iconic Land Rover?
“I’m severely biased on this, BUT, I’m very fond of the current Defender rear-ends. Especially in darker colors.” — Matt Tuccillo
Zoom Zoom Zoom
“I am not a crossover person, but the Mazda CX-30 is one car that, no matter how many times I see it, has never made me recoil or judge. Mazda is pretty clear that a lot of design effort went into making the shape of the car—especially the rear—not look like a crossover.
Most CUVs come out looking like boxes with a little flair, but the CX-30 looks cohesive and attractive to me. A bit vanilla, sure, but if I’m shopping for a crossover, the last thing I am looking for is something that stands out in the crowd. The CX-30 seems to blend in without being boring.” — Kyle Smith
Bronco Sport
“I’m really partial to the old-school styling of the Ford Bronco Sport, especially from the rear. Certainly the full-sized Bronco got the off-road chops, but for my money, the smaller Escape-based Sport graduated a little higher from its design school class.
Not sure how that happened, but Ford really hatched a winner with this model. I’m seeing a bunch of them on the road, and my head turns every time I spot one, particularly from the nether regions.” — Steven Cole Smith
“Strangely enough, when those first came out, I thought they looked kinda dumb, especially since they came out before the hyped new Ford Bronco. It felt like the Bronco Sport was trying to be the real thing but the designers at Ford had to dumb it down too much as to not steal sales from its big brother. But the Sport’s design has grown on me, and now I enjoy seeing them in the wild. They’re a good-looking CUV all-around.” — Ben Woodworth
Find more values
Search for prices of other cars, trucks, vans and motorcycles
The F Pace SVR hands down in my opinion has the nice rear end out there, and a killer exhaust to match.
Hate to admit it, but each time I see the back of the Range Rover, my heart feels like it skips a beat. Maybe it’s that feeling of “I want it, but I don’t want the reliability of it” feeling. Money is not an issue. But unless Range Rover includes the price of THEM coming to my house to pick up and drop off the car for warranty service, I’m out.
I’d agree with the Defender, but it gets second place for me. First place goes to the 2016 and modern Escalade. Giant rear, giant hatch, giant taillights running up the whole rear, those scream peak SUV to me!
Check out the Genesis GV70. Reminds me of the 67 Pontiac GTO…clean and attractive.
I am all about the R3X. It may well be my next vehicle (could I ever give up my now 17-year-old Cayman S?) if it really makes it to production and the cost is reasonable. It just looks so “right” and 85- hp…
Drat. I was trying to type: “and a possible 850 hp…”
1959 Chevrolet Brookwood,Parkwood,Kingswood and yes 4dr Nomad.
I’m not a fan of SUV design selfishly because they have ‘stolen’ from the passion I have always had for new traditional sedans that are now dying off.
But if I’m going to pick one, it would be a tie between the Genesis GV70 and the Kia Telluride. I love how the GV70 mimics the slim wide taillight of Pontiac’s from years ago. The Telluride has a very simple curved taillight design and rear end appeal that I think is very different from other traditional
‘blocky’ SUVs.
As far as classic SUVs, there’s nothing like the ‘73-91 Chevy Blazer. Was way ahead of its time in design when introduced in late 1972.
Can’t beat the rugged rear of the best SUV ever the SQ7 near supercar performance with brutal looks
Would the Ferrari FF qualify as a SUV?
I don’t like the look of any of the “SUV”s in this article, to me an SUV is the 80’s Suburbans.
But I also can’t stand majority of vehicles from the 90’s to today.
The new Hyundai Santa Fe.
SUV’s are all butt-ugly. They look like colored turds rolling down the streets. No personality, no individualized status, but for the name tag on the bonnet, and different taillights.
An engineer’s dream: Some group-think team bashed a 70’s Oldsmobobble Vista Cruiser into a wall, the resultant crash shortened and squished up the chassis to the current blob size.
“We have a winner!”, exclaimed Team Leader. Marketing proclaimed an SUV. The rest is boredom…
I have to vote for the Tesla Model Y. Soooo sexy.
Bronco Sport.
SUV and “good looking” that’s an oxymoron.