Media | Articles
Our Two Cents: Best-Looking SUV from the Back?
Validation is a wonderful feeling, as sometimes our thoughts on automobiles (and car culture, to a larger extent) resonate with our readers in specific ways. The question you see above may sound far-fetched, but a thought exercise about the best-looking SUV posterior was given to us by a reader named Mark. And we thank him for that!
“How about asking a question about the best looking SUV from the back? (Current models only.) I just saw an ugly Mercedes with too much going on back there.”
Our internal chat got a little out of hand, so I decided to include both crossover utility vehicles (CUVs) and concept vehicles. Well, only one concept vehicle that could make production. Perhaps you can tell why we all want one particular vehicle to make production so badly? Tell us what you think in the comments.
Please Make The Rivian R3X

“For whatever reason, it seems like EVs have the best modern rear-end designs. I think the back of the Rivian R3X is awesome, and I really hope they build it. It’s the right combo of modern styling while subtly (or not so subtly?) paying homage to the Lancia Delta Integrale, one of my favorite vehicles of all time. The ride height and stance of it from the rear just make it look extra fun.

If you’re forcing me to pick an SUV/CUV that currently in production, then I’ll have to say—and I’m surprising myself with this decision—the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally.
I have always thought those Mustang taillights are cool. That, the big stupid wing, and the racing stripes just do it for me. Can you tell I’m a fan of rally-inspired vehicle design?” — Ben Woodworth
Marketplace
Buy and sell classics with confidence

This might be a stretch since it isn’t in production, but the Rivian R3 expertly channels Lancia Delta while looking appropriately modern. It’s neither generic blob nor “look at me, I’m cosplaying as an off-roader,” and mmm, the proportions are just right.
I don’t usually care for SUVs, but the R3 had me staring at my screen for a long while when it was revealed.” — Eddy Eckart
We’d Also Like A Production Scout Traveler

“If pre-production vehicles are in, I’ve got to mention the Scout Traveler. The way the spare tire carrier is integrated is nice, but the shape of the D-pillar is just a great homage to the Scout II, even though the original Traveler didn’t have that instantly recognizable rear window shape.” — Brandan Gillogly
HiPhi X … X-cept?


“I pick the HiPhi X, because it’s a CUV that does so much once you cross the B-pillar. Granted, they stole the concept from the Tesla Model X and its falcon doors, but the implementation looks far less complicated and is likely more durable/reliable. The only problem is that HiPhi is a Chinese company, which means it has little hope of selling products in America. And then I recently googled them to learn they are likely declaring bankruptcy.
Sigh, let me try this again.




Yep, I still love the Hyundai Ioniq 5’s pixelated rear styling. The photos Cameron Neveu took for my story back in 2022 still hold up three years later. 8-bit car design may not take over the world like tail fins or gaping maw front ends, but these pictures tell a thousand words of positivity. And it’s practical and functional, too.” — Sajeev Mehta
The Iconic Range Rover

“My vote is for the range-topping Range Rover: Elegant, simple, substantial, and it evokes all the feelings.” — Joe DeMatio
Or The Iconic Land Rover?

“I’m severely biased on this, BUT, I’m very fond of the current Defender rear-ends. Especially in darker colors.” — Matt Tuccillo
Zoom Zoom Zoom

“I am not a crossover person, but the Mazda CX-30 is one car that, no matter how many times I see it, has never made me recoil or judge. Mazda is pretty clear that a lot of design effort went into making the shape of the car—especially the rear—not look like a crossover.
Most CUVs come out looking like boxes with a little flair, but the CX-30 looks cohesive and attractive to me. A bit vanilla, sure, but if I’m shopping for a crossover, the last thing I am looking for is something that stands out in the crowd. The CX-30 seems to blend in without being boring.” — Kyle Smith
Bronco Sport

“I’m really partial to the old-school styling of the Ford Bronco Sport, especially from the rear. Certainly the full-sized Bronco got the off-road chops, but for my money, the smaller Escape-based Sport graduated a little higher from its design school class.
Not sure how that happened, but Ford really hatched a winner with this model. I’m seeing a bunch of them on the road, and my head turns every time I spot one, particularly from the nether regions.” — Steven Cole Smith
“Strangely enough, when those first came out, I thought they looked kinda dumb, especially since they came out before the hyped new Ford Bronco. It felt like the Bronco Sport was trying to be the real thing but the designers at Ford had to dumb it down too much as to not steal sales from its big brother. But the Sport’s design has grown on me, and now I enjoy seeing them in the wild. They’re a good-looking CUV all-around.” — Ben Woodworth
RickN is right on!
Gotta go with the Jaguar F-pace or I-Pace… But in general, no better rear end than a series 1 E-Type or F-Type coupe.
In my opinion the Range Rover has by far the best-looking backend of any SUV on the market.
The Porsche Cayenne is really nice looking and you can customize the lenses and exhaust tips in endless ways to fine tune it just right
I admire the rear ends of all SUV/CUV’s. As I pass them in my ALFA !
I can’t get excited over aesthetics of a box on wheels but I can get excited about how useful and functional it is. Having a mid-large SUV (Honda Pilot) with the same powertrain as my mid-large sports sedan (Acura TLX) highlights the versatility of a great naturally aspirated V6 and a very competent torque-vectoring AWD system. They both take the boredom away from the daily commute, they do more, much more than what’s required.
Genesis GV70 should be on the list.
I totally agree with David on the Genesis GV70. The taillights and exhaust complement each other perfectly. Of course I’m biased as my wife drives a GV70.
I`ve owned one and frankly I`m sick of looking at them. To each his own but to me they are expensive to repair on average even for a DIY person ( why do you need 4 wheel drive in Florida ) most of them have so so gas mileage and they seem to all look the same after a while and way, way, way overpriced.
My new Hyundai Santa Fe Caligraphy.
The Rivian tail lights have a distinct resemblance to the Charger front end, but only in red. By the way, why does this site keep commenting that I’m posting too fast when I can only use one finger? If I were typing any slower, I would be deemed to be in cardiac arrest.
My 2018 Audi Q3.
I am a dedicated anti-SUV car guy, so much so that when I was looking for an inexpensive used EV as a second car I never even looked at any, even though that restricted my choices considerably. But I really like the Hyundai Ioniq 5, backside and all.
I bought a Bolt, but looking at the specs the Ioniq is only 0.2” taller. Maybe it’s really just a station wagon in disguise.
Porsche Macan; never gets old. And no, I don’t own one.
Boring.
VOLVO P1800ES & VOLVO XC 90 (tail lights)
I do like the aesthetics of the 1800ES but I wouldn’t call it an SUV.