Vision Thing: The best-designed vehicles on the market today

Cameron Neveu

I’ve had the privilege of writing Vision Thing for you for a little while now, and although we’ve covered a lot of ground in car design, there’s much still uncovered. It occurred to me the other day when I was showering: I haven’t really given you an insight into which cars I think have a really standout design—and why.

(You never know when these thoughts are going to hit you; this why you should always carry a notebook. Probably not into the shower, though.)

This time of the year, there are a lot of list articles about, and I’m not one to leave a bandwagon un-jumped on for my readers’ sakes. I know I’ve mentioned a few tangentially both above and below the line, but I will now wheel my own opinions out into the harsh glare of the studio strip lights for a design critique session.

What follows then, is a brief list of standouts currently (or soon to be) available to buy, each of which should make a sizable dent in your kid’s college fund. If you’re thinking about any of these and need an excuse to take to the finance committee, tell them a professional said each is a future design classic.

Lexus LC 500

2021 Lexus LC 500 Convertible side profile shadow light at yacht club
Jordan Lewis

Sometimes a manufacturer struggles with a design language for years, trying to make it work over several different models, before finally the right canvas comes along and it all suddenly makes sense.

Cadillac tried for years with its Art & Science philosophy before finally nailing it on the 2013 ATS. The concept version of the Lexus LC, the LF-LC, showed us in 2012 what its L-finesse language was going to look like—swooping surfaces that twisted in all directions, a massive spindle grille.

It was fabulous.

Unfortunately, the first production Lexus sporting L-finesse clothes was not a big grand tourer but an urban crossover, the NX, which looked like it had been rolled down the stairs. The same story repeated itself with subsequent product releases, but when we got the LC 500 in 2017, it all came together (again) magnificently.

The height of the cowl above the bottom of the side daylight opening (DLO) is much higher than normal, but this allows the metal in front of the door mirror to roll smoothly to the horizontal to meet the hood. It lends the whole car an F1-style forward rake. The dimensions temper the aggressiveness.

Even the trademark spindle grille works in this application. Searingly modern and unmistakably Japanese, it looks like nothing else on the road.

The LC 500 feels like the kind of car Jaguar should be making if it had the daring. But to call the LC a Japanese Jaguar is to sell it short: Gaydon would never be this bold.

The LC 500 is probably my favorite new car on sale, if you’re stuck for something to get your favorite auto-design writer for Christmas.

Ford Maverick

2022 Ford Maverick front three-quarter action
Cameron Neveu

At first, I didn’t totally get the Maverick, a small truck that wasn’t really all that rugged. There were plenty of options for pickup buyers already, although not at this price point.

Then it dawned on me. The Maverick is a direct replacement for the Focus. It’s even built off the same platform. A pickup for the non-traditional pickup buyer.

Suddenly, it all made perfect sense. Eschewing the overt brashness that characterizes basically every other open-backed vehicle on the market, the Maverick is a handsome vehicle with crisp detailing and surfacing that will take you to work without turning your spine to cookie crumbs, and be ready to get mucky on the weekend.

Arguably the Maverick’s best feature is that eye-catching MSRP: $23,690, as of this writing, for a 2023 model. You need a component catalog the size of Ford’s coupled with its economies of scale to get down that low. The strategy is clever as opposed to ruthless and cost-cut. There’s nothing you don’t really need—the base model even comes with old-fashioned steelies. When these become more widely available the aftermarket is going to wild with them, 3-D printers a-whirring.

A sensible, economical, good-looking, and practical commuter vehicle that happens to be a pickup? America, your 1980 Fiat Panda has arrived.

Toyota Prius

New Prius Prototype white
Toyota

Okay. Hands up on who saw this coming? I certainly didn’t.

Toyota stunned everyone when it showed us the 2024 Prius in November. For four generations the Prius has been a worthy but polarizing car, bought by people who took conservation very seriously and wanted everyone to know it. A slightly unnecessary, aerodynamic hunch leant it the appearance of an oversized computer mouse. It was hardly the last word in style. Until now.

The whole part-electric powertrain deal no longer being a novelty (nearly every car on this list is available as a hybrid in one form or another), Toyota has wisely shed the yurts and yoghurt vibe and given us a Prius that no longer trades on economy but on looks. It’s like seeing the server you smiled at in Whole Foods dressed to kill in a swanky downtown cocktail bar.

Squints hard. Prius, is that you?

It’s a much lower, wedgier car for 2024. The high point of the roof has been pulled right back to the rear passenger compartment, which in this or any segment is unheard of. This allows the cant rail to dive seamlessly into the A-pillar.

Volume has been added into the hood at the center line, and the abrupt cut-off tail of previous versions toned down considerably. This no longer feels like a car that places economy above all other considerations, and in sign of growing design confidence, Toyota have cheekily referenced the Ferrari SF90 front headlight graphic.

Surprised? I dropped my wheatgrass smoothie.

Lincoln Navigator

Lincoln

About a year ago my Range Rover Sport slipped into my life. About a day later, off it went into my heart. I bonded with it in a way I never did with my previous daily, an Audi TT.

“Designers are all style over function,” my ass!

Even though mine is a 2011, the Range Rover still has a regal on-road presence and is full of thoughtful touches (and one or two infuriating ones, such as no rear-passenger compartment lighting!). It simply goes about its business quietly and competently. No, I don’t take it off-road, but have you seen the state of the nation’s tarmac recently? I’ll take that day-to-day isolation, thanks.

Ford has not been averse to lifting Range Rover design cues for its bigger SUVs in the past, but with the Navigator, released in 2018 and refreshed last year, Lincoln has a model that can go head-to-head with Gaydon’s best. Look hard enough, and you can see a little modern Range Rover in the Navigator’s body-side surfacing—that’s a compliment, not a demerit. This is domestic luxury that need apologize to no one.

To get a measure of how good the Navigator is, consider that Jeep had a free field goal with the new Grand Wagoneer—and missed it by miles. The Navigator’s wrap-around glazing DLO looks classy, all of a piece and fittingly expensive. The Wagoneer’s body-colored pillars, the exact opposite.

Decorated with just the right amount of chrome, the Navigator exudes American class and authority without going over the top, something that hasn’t always been true of high-end domestic cars in the past. I actually saw a photo of a Navigator in central London recently (probably a diplomat’s car) and you know what? It didn’t look out of place one bit.

As designers we have to accept that customers like SUVs and these days they are willing to trade the last couple of mpg to drive them. To that end, the Navigator doesn’t have a V-8. These cars will continue to exist, so we must make them as safe and fuel-efficient as possible. That they generate good profit margins and support American jobs is something to be celebrated as well.

Ferrari 296 GTB

Ferrari 296 GTB front three-quarter
Ferrari

So we finally got the V-6 baby Ferrari that’s been rumored for who knows how many years. Except it’s not really a baby at all, slotting somewhere into the middle of Maranello’s ever more-confusing range. No matter. The 296 is simply the best-looking Ferrari in an absolute age. It is gorgeous.

That’s not something that can be said of many recent efforts from chief designer Flavio Manzoni. Although generally good in profile and proportion, his vehicles have been extremely complex in the detailing. Surfaces desecrated with nicks and cuts, awkward lamp graphics, and, in the case of the rather plain Roma, the best car Aston Martin never made. Ferrari’s been twisting the marque in knots to create ever more-special editions and even now an SUV.

This is important. Ferrari’s rivals at McLaren have been hampered by spinning a range of indeterminate models off of the essentially the same kit of parts; the carbon-fiber cell and the 3.8-liter twin turbo V-8. Maranello shouldn’t have this problem, given the range of engines and layouts at its disposal: You should know straight away if you’re looking at the mid-engined, entry-level V-8 one, the front-engined, V-12 GT one, whatever the range topper is, and so on. Recently, that hasn’t been the case for Ferrari. At a car show in the fall, a designer friend and I were standing behind an SF90 wondering if we’d got the model designation right.

The 296GTB is a refreshing return to a classically beautiful aesthetic that belies the technical complexity beneath. The nose has one wide, mesh-filled opening, flanked by two smaller air curtains on each side and a smaller, lower central one. It’s simple without being simplistic, an attitude which is very hard to get right. The hips’ air vents are models of restraint, impressive given what the airflow requirements of this thing must be. Rather than punch more holes in the rear body work or increase the size of the rear lights, the rear fog and reflectors are brilliantly and subtly incorporated into the upward surface of the diffuser.

Minimalist without being minimal, this is one of those cars that can only be ruined by the inevitable go-faster version with tacked-on aero kit. What was I saying about that Lexus?

Honorable mentions: Land Rover Defender

2020 Land Rover Defender Gondwana
Brandan Gillogly

It’s been with us for three years. Was it what we expecting? The evergreen original combined Blake’s Satanic mills with British sheer bloody-mindedness. We were never going to get a newer version of that. The workhorse role it was designed for has long since been taken over by base model pickups and ATVs, so how to keep this most beloved nameplate relevant?

By creating a frighteningly modern-looking, tough, capable SUV that, in lower trims at least (get the steel wheels!), maintains some of the class transcendence that characterized the original. The Defender looks like nothing else on the road and shows up the Ineos Grenadier up for the fool’s errand it is.

Honorable mentions: Alfa Romeo Giulia

2022 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio front three-quarter track action
Brandan Gillogly

I would have put the Mazda6 here, because it remains for me the blueprint for a mid-market sporting saloon, but that body is now ten years old. (It’s also no longer available domestically.)

When I first saw the Giulia, my reaction was Alfa Romeo should have had the Mazda in Alfa Centro Stile as inspiration instead of whatever they did use. But if ever a car looked better in the flesh than photos, the Giulia is it.

Just refreshed for 2022, it was famously crash-designed and developed by a dedicated tiger team after Sergio ordered a do-over. Little wonder that initial cars had teething problems. But it’s one of those cars that makes pause and smile every time I see one out on the road. Tautly organic, faintly muscular, and delicately detailed, the Giulia makes its German rivals look decidedly ordinary.

Adrian Clarke Dodge Challenger SRT 392 rental
Adrian Clarke

I purposely didn’t mention the Dodge Challenger in this list, because if you’ve kept up with my columns, you’ll know my feelings for that particular slice of Mopar design brilliance. Truth is, there are a lot of decent-looking vehicles available for sale right now. Not everything needs to be a design revolution or market disruptor—sometimes getting the basics right, and being solidly handsome, well-marketed, and ably developed is enough.

Hopefully these will give you some inspiration for the January sales (if such a thing will happen in today’s weird new-car market). If not, next time, I’ll tease you with some of my design choices that you can’t buy.

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it.

Read next Up next: “Rambo” 1970 Corvette Stingray is an autocross show-stopper
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    The Grand Wagoneer missed it by miles … we own one and you should drive one before you make a statement like that… with the 392 and the amazing suspension this car has you really sound like a idiot.

    How a car drives and performs is not a reflection of it’s design. It’s an iconic nameplate and the original was a design classic. The new one doesn’t really capture any of that.

    Not seeing the visual appeal of the Range Rover. Not at all.
    I also don’t understand why my wife always thought Willem Dafoe was attractive.
    Maybe it’s me.

    The best car in the market by far is the Porsche Panamera Turbo S. Nothing else comes close. Power, handling, interior.

    Ford has missed the mark again. The new Ranger to replace the old Ranger but it was bigger than my old F150. Now the Maverick is still bigger than my 11 Ranger but with a small motor. One piece body like my last old Ranchero but still bigger and doesn’t have a 460 like my last one. What do I have to do to get a SMALL pickup. I’m glad I bought the 11 to replace my 02 when it dies, but at 238,000 miles it’s still going strong. That’s ok, the 11 only has 22,000 miles and will outlast me.

    I had several Ford Explorer Sport Trac. All good vehicles with power enough for pulling my 20 foot boat.
    When they were discontinued I kept a 2010 hoping Ford would bring it back with the new Ranger.
    I couldn’t wait any longer and bought a 2020 Colorado ZR2. It is very capable and I like it but it doesn’t
    Have all the features of a Sport Trac. No power roof, no power back window, straight rear axle, no cover on the box, no V8, higher sticker price. Thanks to my nephews I get their employee discount at any of the big three. It helps a lot. Please bring the Sport Trac back Ford.

    The Prius has never been a good looking car–until now–and it’s damn good looking. Alas, that damn windshield is so shallow that I cannot but help to imagine that the visibility is going to be terrible, and that it’s going to be a pain in the tuchus to clean snow and ice off in winter.

    That Alpha just isn’t good looking at all. It’s genuinely ugly, like some 5th grader tried to draw it from the classic Alphas. The eyes are scowly and warped and more generally, the face is too busy.

    Trucks and trucklets don’t look good ever. Although that Maverick looks like such a practical take on the pickup that it probably is deserving.

    Where’s the Ioniq 5? Those are one day going to be displayed in MoMA.

    After 10 years and owning four Dodge Challenger models, besides the seductive design it’s been a pleasure to own and in return has given me miles of smiles. Taking my 2020 Scat Pack on the auto train and driving back to New York was pure joy. My wife has a beautiful green Alfa Romeo Stelvio, another looker.

    I’m in the auto industry and I also collect classic cars. I’ve been asked why I do so – many feel the old cars are not reliable, leak fluids, difficult to repair due to scarce parts which are hard to find and expensive, don’t have safety features and don’t have creature comforts and modern electronics. And they’re not very fast, compared to today’s cars. Yes, I will agree with them on a practical level, but a classic car is just that, a classic! After thinking about this for a few minutes, I came to the conclusion that a classic car must have the following:
    1. Be fun to drive.
    2. Look good … make that great!
    3. Be desirable – something I’ll go over in a little detail later.
    4. and it must make the owner (and passengers) smile!

    All of the above may seem obvious – common sense, right? But what about #3? Why is the car desirable? What makes it desirable? How did it become desirable? Desirability could come from having something you’ve always wanted. Maybe we desire it for the rarity – this could be how it became desirable. Think of the E30 BMW – it checks all four boxes, but it didn’t drive any better in the last five years vs the previous 30. What did happen is that they started to disappear. They became rare to see on the road and thus became desirable. They fit the other three criteria as well, so now they’re a classic that’s in demand. Is it that simple? The other part of desirability is that many of us wanted to own one in the 80’s – it was the ultimate yuppie car. Some of us had other financial priorities, so we couldn’t buy one. Now that we have disposable income, we can afford one and we want it!

    For me, I remember those cool Alfa Romeo Spiders I’d see on the road – top down on a nice spring/summer day! I thought it was the ultimate warm weather car! As a middle age man, I can now afford to buy one, so of course I have done so – too many times! The desirability is just that – I want one and I can afford it, so I’m going to get one!

    If we consider these “future” collectible cars, are there any that some 14-35 year old says; “I want a 2024 Prius!”? My guess is no. A Ferrari 296? Sure, but that’s a dream car, like the Countach was when I was a teenager. And no, I don’t own a Countach and I have no desire to. But an Alfa Spider could’ve been in my financial reach back then, if I made other choices (probably bad ones). Are there any other cars on the list that fit the desirability criteria? Maybe the Challenger – yup, the kids love those cars! Many would also love to own a Tesla – that could be a future classic. BMW M3, M4? Porsche Cayman/Boxster/911? Subaru STI? Corolla GR? Yes, those could be future classics and my guess is that they probably will.

    I couldn’t even find a Maverick to test drive when I was looking, so I bought a Nissan Frontier. Great truck! As for today’s design classics I think maybe only the Ferrari and Alfa in this article makes the cut. I can think of many more that are more likely.

    K, so, Lexus LC OMG wholeheartedly agree / modern sensuality of the sixties XKE [ still missing my two DD SC430’s ] , Maverick perfect for young families/ great for retired folks driving their grandkids to school etc/ and truckish enough to fit in-between [ An evolved El Camino with room for two additional bodies/ more FWD familiar [ transitional driving experience/ entry level truck marketing!] than my Ridgeline ever was , Prius~. stunning evolution / recently sold my [now] deeply missed 16 Walnut V , Navigator.. nay nay~ rides like a donkey cart/horrible lighting/seating, Ferrari… none here to bear witness however provided the inspirational soul for my GR 86 [ row row is the way to go go ] which is just plain funnnnn, Landie… statement piece but as with most of this ilk the maintenance cost after five years would cripple most third world economies , Giulia ~ gorgeous but snug – destined to be a twenty year old ‘ watch list ‘ for increasing values classic in twenty years , Challenger; the bull for all seasons~ pick your flavour and enjoy… haven’t owned one yet but sure are a cool car with a long shelf life…. Some vices are mechanical, mine at least… still loving my GR 86…next? AWD Prius may be ordered [Canada]

    I agree with Steve, In my opinion most new vehicles eventually are throw aways, built for todays complicated masses. Lets not get overenthusiastic about including them with special cars that are proven timeless. I will stick with my correct 66 corvette 427 side pipe roadster, as obnoxious as it is.

    This is a pathetic list, because these are pathetic cars. Has anybody observed how much cheap plastic
    that is holding together that Butter-cup Maverick Truck. It’s horrible. My opinion is there are no car guys running car companies. How does anyone keep their job that designed the Chevy Blazer, and insult to it’s pedigree? I predicted 14 years ago that the “Big 3” will be reduced to large trucks, and SUV’s. The transportation, throw away cars will all be imports. As long as the consumer can get A $129 monthly payment for 96 month’s , they’re happy. And it will of course be silver.
    My experience has been once a car crosses the 10/yr-100k miles, you just learn to live with Gremlins that thrive on “Service Engine Soon” lights. I know it’s “impractical” but if one of these 3 would bring back a Chevy II, Falcon, Dart, AMC American with a wiring harness with basics, I think sales would spiral.
    Back to the list, I see nothing there that says “car show in 25 years”. They already killed off Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Plymouth, Mercury and when Us Baby-boomers are gone, Buick is gone, probably Lincoln as well.
    Cookie Cutter future for the automotive industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *