11 Mustangs that never came to be

The Ford Mustang’s path from affordable coupe to performance icon has taken many twists and turns in its nearly 60-year history. Built on a platform similar to that of Ford’s econo-oriented Falcon when it was first introduced as a mid-year model in 1964, the Mustang pulled much of its styling inspiration from the Allegro concept that had appeared the year before, and its formula of small car plus V-8 engine would set the tone for the next six decades of its existence.

At least, that’s what happened in our timeline. The alternate history of the Ford Mustang—the one that never came to be—shot off in all sorts of weird and wonderful directions, buffeted by the winds of market change, the addled dreams of designers chasing the latest trends, and the vagaries of engineers dazzled by the latest technologies.

Check out these Mustangs that might have been, but never were.

The sedan

4-Door Mustang
4-door Mustang sedan concept. Ford

Two early “what if” branches of the family tree illustrated what the Mustang lineup could have looked like had it expanded into a more complete portfolio of cars. Instead, it aimed at satisfying performance fans later and those seeking an inexpensive commuter early on.

The wagon

While the four-door Mustang sedan concept, built in 1965, never made it anywhere past the designer’s studio, a two-door wagon (or shooting brake) version of the car had much longer legs. The fevered dream of three Ford fans—including Robert Cumberford (designer), Barney Clark (Blue Oval ad exec), and Jim Licata (partner in crime)—the cargo-friendly Mustang was converted from a coupe that had been sent to Italy’s Costruzione Automobili Intermeccanica that same year.

Mustang Wagon
Mustang wagon concept. Ford

When the finished product came back, the trio took it to Ford, Holman Moody, and even independent automotive production companies, all of whom passed on putting it into production. While the original is lost to the mists of time, a number of individuals and aftermarket companies have produced their own Mustang wagon replicas based on its design, giving us a glimpse back at a history that never happened for a car that never officially existed.

Mustang II: A bigger Maverick?

It’s interesting that the most lamented member of the Mustang fold was also the one that underwent such a far-ranging design process before being birthed into the world.

By the early ’70s it was clear that Ford would have to make some choices about the future of the coupe, given impending EPA regulations about fuel economy, the precarious world energy situation, and changing crash-test regulations. This meant a crossroads for the Mustang, and some incredibly out-there looks at what the next-generation Mustang II could be.

Initially, Ford tried to retain the car’s original platform and give it a much longer, personal-luxury type of design, but it became clear that wouldn’t work. A second swipe at the O.G. platform produced something that looked more like an enlarged Maverick than it did a Mustang.

1970 Mustang II Early Design Proposal
1970 Mustang II Early Design Proposal Maverick Elements original platform. Ford

Two crucial interventions in the Mustang II process led the company to the eventual production car: a decision to shrink the coupe’s wheelbase (and work a partnership with Ghia).

Ghia’s nose jobs

Granada style Mustang II
Granada-style Mustang II Ford

By 1971, Ford was producing Mustang concepts at a startling rate. At first, the smaller Ghia-assisted prototypes still embodied the upright, premium coupe look that had been seen on the larger models, both with a shark-nosed element that was clearly European, and without, in a style that would be seen later on vehicles like the Granada.

Japanese-esque hatch

Where things really got interesting was when the Ghia studio jumped well outside the box of the decade’s styling trends and offered a hatchback version of the Mustang II that, seen in hindsight, could easily have leapt forth from the production lines of a Japanese manufacturer like Datsun or Mitsubishi in the early ’80s. Arguably, this is a far cleaner design than the actual production Mustang II, but it’s difficult to project how a look that was so far ahead of its time would have been received by a market that was still staggering out of the muscle car era.

Early 80s styling ford mustang concept
Early ’80s styling—almost Japanese—from Ghia in 1971. Ford

The Probe that almost became a pony

Ghia’s prescient hatch was a harbinger of the existential crisis that would strike the Mustang in the mid-’80s. Swamped by strong-selling imports, and convinced that the market for traditional, rear-wheel-drive, V-8 coupes was about to drop off a cliff, Ford partnered with Mazda to produce the anti-Mustang, which was dubbed the SN-16.

Although the styling never moved past this clay model (which displays the grille-mounted pony logo running in the opposite direction, presumably as a sign of distress), engineering teams were hard at work on a new platform for the car, and by the time testing began in 1987, FoMoCo fans were up in arms about the proposed drive-wheel switch for the Mustang and mounted a letter-writing campaign that deep-sixed the idea.

If this front-wheel-drive jelly bean looks familiar, however, that’s because it would eventually find its way to the market as the Ford Probe in 1988, a coupe that never really resonated with the performance crowd (and which was kissing cousin to the Mazda MX-6).

Three action heroes, one rescued icon

It’s no surprise that Ford’s sudden about-face seriously impacted the development of the Mustang’s replacement. Initially, the company simply continued to sell the Fox-platform car alongside the Probe, delaying its replacement in part because the front-wheel-drive experiment had soaked up so many development dollars. Not only that, but the Blue Oval continued to dump cash into front-wheel-drive pony car development at the same time as it pursued a new, rear-wheel-drive platform for the Mustang because it was unwilling to simply walk away from the sunk cost.

By 1990 it became clear that an eight-cylinder, front-wheel-drive Mustang was a non-starter, but by that time there wasn’t much cash left in the coffers to get truly radical with the vehicle’s styling or chassis. The end result was the SN95 platform, also known as Fox-4, which simply updated aspects of the original Fox and allowed for the eventual inclusion of Ford’s modular 4.6-liter V-8.

Caitlyn Bruce Jenner Ford Mustang
The “Bruce Jenner” design. Ford

A reheated Fox might have spelled disaster for the Mustang if it not for the idea of latching on to heritage elements from the original design and baking them in to the new model. One of the first of the modern retro cars that would come to define a certain slice of ’90s automotive styling, the SN95 Mustang’s potential looks were whittled down to three contenders, each named after a popular action star of the day,

The “Bruce Jenner” design clearly displays elements that would go on to eventual production in both the Ford Contour and redesigned Ford Taurus sedans, but its smooth lines were considered too soft for the Mustang.

The “Rambo” was a much more aggressive liftback design that seemingly shared its inspiration with GM’s radically redesigned F-body Camaros and Firebirds that would also debut around the same time. It was seen as more extroverted than what Mustang fans would accept.

Schwarzenneger Ford Mustang concept
Schwarzenneger concept. Ford

The “Schwarzenegger” was the model that would eventually find its way into production, a car that featured the familiar, large side scallops that evoked the original Mustang design, as well as the long hood and short rear deck evocative of the early coupes. It was this look that would lead to a dramatic surge in sales for the pony car and once again make it relevant in the world of both performance and style.

Two other intriguing silhouette sketches of the fourth-generation Mustang also show how designers of the same era share much of the same mental real estate when exploring potential concepts. One features inspiration drawn from the Mercedes-Benz SL-Class coupe, while the other depicts a startling prediction of what Dodge’s upcoming Avenger would look like a few years down the road.

Interestingly, a combination of the Rambo and the Schwarzenegger designs was also built, and it’s hard not to look at it without seeing the face of the Oldsmobile Alero that would hit the streets less than a decade later. Woof.

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark us.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: Jeep’s hybrid Willys, M5 CS tuned to 900 hp, new green paint for Defender’s 75th
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    had a 66 in 75-76 my Dad had an idea to make a short bed Pick Up Version, I thought a Mustang with the Corral Package might have a place in the market

    I agree the wagon should have been produced it would have been drag racing with the vega back in the day what a awesome design they should e-stang the wagon enjoy

    Well no one really wanted a Mustang 4 door but if you look at the picture again it was a 3 door! Sporty on the drivers side and familymobile on the passenger side!

    Looked up a photo of the Allegra. To me the Allegra looks more like the Volvo driven by ‘The Saint’ than a 1965 Mustang.

    As a young man in his 20’s, only the fastback worked for me. I even went with a ‘73 coupe, but it was boring. Now, as an aging boomer (a label I wear with pride!) the wagon sings to me!

    Ford, being the master at station wagons, definitely missed the boat by not producing the wagon version of the Mustang. Would it have been called the Must-Wagon?

    The original Mustang was the best looking. You see American automakers feel they must change the style every year. obvious the ’65 and ’66 stayed true. The ’67 changed all that for worse. Over the years kept looking uglier every year. Ford could have modernized and still kept the original look. The same is true for the Camaro. But that’s not what US automakers do. The 70’s made pony cars look worse. But that’ how we do it in the US. European auto makers try to stay very close to the look of the classics.

    Note the four-door is a two-door on the driver’s side; maybe a pillared coupe rather than a hardtop? With the early Falcon hubcaps, I wonder if this was more an idea for a new Falcon that would ride the Mustang’s coattails?

    Thank God, the sedan, and station wagon were not built. Both would have destroyed the Mustang name, just like the Mustang SUV is doing right now. Personally, I would have killed the Fox Body, or should I say “Box Body?” Damn things didn’t have a single pony on them.

    Ghia, just because you have an Italian sounding design name does not mean that you make things that look good. Ghia designs for Ford looked awful in period, and did not age well. Those all look just plain awful.

    Put me down for the Comet like design Mustang II, I like that better than the Mustang II.

    I think a mustang pickup would be interesting in todays world. Not back when pickups were just work trucks. Someone has probably chopped the back off an old 65 and put a box on it. I’d like to see one. Where was Chip Foose back then?

    It’s good to see that Ford stayed true to the Mustang original design through the years unlike GM Camaro and Firebird. It was the GM design changes on these iconic pony cars that brought the low sales and interest in their cars. Still today the Chevy Camaro is looking for it’s true identity.

    That and the fact that GM refuses to use high-tech designs in their V8s. That explains why it takes 6.2L in an SS to be barely faster than a 5.0L GT. I’m certain the 6.2 isn’t capable of getting anywhere near the 25+ mpg of the 5.0 on top of that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *