10 Minivans That Prove Practical Can Be Cool

Dodge

You’d be forgiven for turning your nose up at the idea of a classic people-mover. Called multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs) in Europe and minivans in the U.S., it’s perhaps one of the least glamorous vehicle segments ever devised—a class of car devoted to moving you and your presumably plentiful offspring from place to place, with maximum thought given to practicality and minimum attention to sleek styling or driver appeal.

And yet, older minivans are enjoying a bit of a moment right now. Perhaps it’s fueled by nostalgia from Gen Xers and millennials who used to travel around in the back of the things, or maybe it’s a backlash to the more more generic and practically compromised crossovers and SUVs that dominate today’s family-car space. Either way, minivans have gone from being deeply uncool to sparking just a little interest among those looking for something a bit different from the norm.

Take a look around Radwood events and you’re sure to find Chrysler minivans and “Dustbuster” Pontiacs, and across the pond at the U.K.’s Festival of the Unexceptional you’re bound to find a Renault Espace or three—signs that an audience who may not have even been around for the first wave of minivans is now beginning to notice them.

Below, we’ve selected 10 of our favorites from the U.S. and Europe, stretching from the 1950s to the 1990s, each of which puts seats above steering feel, headroom ahead of horsepower, and space as a substitute for pace.

Chrysler Minivans

1984 Dodge Caravan front three quarter
Stellantis

For some, this is where the minivan story starts, with the Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager in late 1983. Chrysler’s relatively compact, front-wheel-drive, sliding-door, cup-holder-laden, multi-seated, unibody-structure vans were about as close to the modern definition of a minivan as you’d find in the 1980s.

No longer than the vehicles riding on Chrysler’s compact K-car platform, the vans could seat up to eight, while the K-car–sourced four-cylinder engines didn’t have to work too hard in what was, compared to the older body-on-frame full-size vans that existed at the time, a much lighter and more aerodynamic vehicle. Initially you could get them with five-speed manuals, and compared to an old VW bus, most peoples’ experience of a relatively compact multi-seater, the Caravan and Voyager were rocketships.

It’s no surprise the Chrysler minivans set the minivan template; they simply drove better than the competition, and that included the Japanese models of the period, which weren’t as sophisticated as their American counterparts, and couldn’t always be relied upon to stay upright. Find one today, and you’ll rarely need more than $5000.

Fiat 600 Multipla

Fiat 600 Multipla
Wiki Commons/Alfvanbeem

Here’s a fun nugget of trivia: The Fiat 600 Multipla arrived in 1956, making it even older than the brand’s now-definitive model, the Nuova 500, which went on to influence almost all of Fiat’s modern range. That includes today’s Fiat 600, though it is now more of an SUV. That’s a shame, because it could have been a brilliant and rather cute MPV like the original Fiat Multipla.

As the name suggested, the 600 Multipla was based on the mechanicals of the 600, which had arrived in 1955. The work of Dante Giacosa, as per both regular 600 and 1957’s 500, it remained rear-engined but with just a foot-and-a-half more length than a Mini (which of course wouldn’t arrive until 1959), it could seat six.

The 600 Multipla really is a classic, more so than any on this list besides the VW Type 2, and it’s similarly prized by collectors: Concours cars have gone for more than £50,000 (around $65K) , and you’ll pay £20K ($25K) for a condition #3 “good” one. With between 16 and 32 hp depending on the year, it’s perhaps not a car you’ll use for serious human transportation, but few MPVs are more historically significant. Or adorable.

Fiat Multipla

Fiat Multipla rear three quarter
Stellantis

If the original Fiat 600 Multipla was among the first true MPVs, tiny or not, the 1998 Multipla felt somewhat late to the party. But it hardly mattered, because it had two things on its side: It was fiendishly clever, squeezing six proper seats into a car shorter than most modern superminis (it’s a mere 13 feet long), and nobody could forget how it looked.

That cleverness is accounted for partly in its width, which was sizable at the time, but at 73.7 inches, it isn’t actually that broad by 2020s standards. The visual it presents is characterful or atrocious depending on your aesthetic sensibilities, but hey, it’s memorable. You may not care if most MPVs even exist, but you’re guaranteed to have at least some kind of opinion on the Multipla.

Inside, things were equally wild, not just for seating three in the front, but for the jumbled pod of gearshift, instruments, vents, and switches in the center, and the deep side windows that provided spectacular visibility. What you may not remember (especially those stateside who didn’t get to experience it) is that the Multipla was great to drive. Neither the gas nor the diesel were especially rapid, with 0–60 times in the 12-second range, but the dash-mounted shift was slick and the wide track meant plenty of grip and stability. A couple of grand gets one of the most distinctive cars of its decade.

Ford Aerostar

Ford Aerostar front three quarter
Flickr/Alden Jewell

If imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery, then consider the Ford Aerostar as flattering to the Chrysler minivans as PSA’s (Peugeot/Citroën) “Eurovans” were to the Espace in Europe. You don’t always need to be first to market as long as you get things right, and more than 2 million sales between 1985 and 1997 suggest Ford didn’t do too badly on that front.

Like many of the 1980s minivans, work actually started on the Aerostar in the 1970s, when bigger body-on-frame vans were still the go-to. Ford’s list of requirements included seven seats, car-like economy, and a body small enough you could park it in a garage—similar to the criteria laid out by Chrysler for its own vans.

Unlike the Chryslers, the V-6-powered Ford was predominantly rear-wheel drive, with all-wheel drive available, and Aerostar styling was more modern than the set-square Chryslers. While still popular, sales never quite matched those of Ford’s rival, and Aerostars are a rarer find today. But if you want a taste of late 20th-century suburban normcore, just $5000 or so secures a pretty tidy one.

Mitsubishi Delica

Mitsubishi Delica
Wiki Commons/Hroyuki Kashioka

We’re casting our eye on a very specific Mitsubishi Delica here, one that has developed a cult following that spreads far beyond its Japanese homeland, despite only being sold new in a handful of markets outside that country. In the U.S. in particular, the model’s popularity exploded when the first imports became legal in 2019—25 years after production of the fourth-gen L400 Delica began.

Why has it suddenly attracted all this demand? Probably because of its dual-purpose appeal: The Delica isn’t just a minivan, it was also widely available with four-wheel drive, its engine and transmission lifted directly from the Pajero 4×4 of the era. With raised suspension and traction from all four wheels, a Delica will go where most minivans will not.

As a result, you can pay an easy five figures for a clean, well-maintained Delica, whether you’re reading this in the U.S. or the U.K., though rough models that have been in Europe for a while start lower. You’ll need to be confident with tall, slightly tippy vehicles, however, as handling isn’t the Delica’s forte. But as a way of mixing SUV-style go-anywhere appeal with the unmatched practicality of a minivan, the Delica is unbeaten.

Pontiac Trans Sport

Pontiac Trans Sport rear three quarter
Wiki Commons/Dogs.barking.duster.ro

Dustbuster. A hand-held vacuum cleaner, but also, thanks to the shape of GM’s trio of wedge-shaped minivans introduced in 1989, one of the best automotive nicknames this side of “Clown Shoe” and “Landcrab.” Most memorable of the Dustbusters was the Pontiac Trans Sport, the brand’s first minivan and the most sportily styled of a group that also included the Chevrolet Lumina APV and Oldsmobile Silhouette.

Designed from the ground up and on a new platform, the Trans Sport’s construction was in some ways similar to the Espace below, with a spaceframe structure from which plastic panels were hung. While not quite as dramatic as the 1986 concept that preceded it, it was certainly one of the more distinctive early minivans too, the glass areas looking more like a Jetsons-style canopy divided by a thick, carry-handle-style B-pillar.

Sporty looks didn’t exactly translate into a scintillating drive, but it was better than operating an actual vacuum cleaner, and a predominantly V-6-powered lineup, including the near-unburstable 3800 beloved across much of GM’s contemporary range, gave it some pep. Like most on this list, the biggest trouble is finding one today, as quite understandably, few families treated them like future classics.

Renault Espace

Renault Espace
Renault

Although the Chrysler minivans kicked off the craze in the United States, in Europe it was Renault—or rather, Matra—behind the first modern MPV, when the Espace made its debut in 1984. Matra had been exploring the monobox people-mover concept since the 1970s, but after being turned down by PSA (Peugeot and Citroën), the company took the idea to Renault.

The Espace launched in 1984, with an unusual part-monocoque, part-spaceframe construction clothed in fiberglass panels, while the longitudinal front-wheel-drive layout was typical of Renaults of the period. PSA’s reluctance was nearly vindicated when Renault sold just nine Espace vans in the model’s first month on the market, but customers quickly realized the benefits, and by the time the second-generation Espace arrived in 1991, Renault had moved nearly 200,000 units.

Today, the Espace is fast becoming appreciated for its distinctive design—a shape that Renault likened to France’s TGV high-speed trains when the car was new. The early Espace is as easy to drive as any other family car from the 1980s, but it packs seven full-sized seats into a footprint barely longer than a modern Megane.

Toyota Previa

Toyota Previa
Toyota

“Is that the mid-engined one?” It is a question you’ll hear a lot with the first-generation Toyota Previa. Indeed it is: Sold in both rear-wheel- and four-wheel-drive formats, the Previa’s 2.4-liter gas engine (either naturally aspirated or supercharged) or 2.2-liter turbodiesel in some markets, is stashed at 75 degrees just aft of the front seats.

Toyota wasn’t new to the MPV concept when it introduced the Previa in 1990—it effectively replaced the Space Cruiser below. The Previa was physically larger, however, and had seven- and eight-seat options, though with the driver sitting in a more conventional place behind the front axle, it’s ultimately not quite as spacious as its predecessor. Almost certainly safer and more refined, though.

The Previa’s appeal today is clearly its styling, with goldfish bowl visibility and a friendly 1990s egg-like form. The interior is great, too, with that unbeatable ’90s Toyota feel and, depending on the model year, either a high-tech hooded gauge cluster or a pleasingly wavy layout. Rust and hard use can kill them off, but a well-maintained Previa, bought for only a few grand, should last indefinitely.

Toyota Space Cruiser

Toyota Space Cruiser
Toyota

The Toyota LiteAce has worn several names over eight generations and more than half a century, but the U.K.’s “Space Cruiser” moniker perhaps best reflects both the fourth-generation van’s purpose and the 1980s obsession with technology and science-fiction better than any other. It’s a far better name than it got in America, where it was known simply as the Toyota Van. Squint a bit, and the Space Cruiser could be a Star Trek shuttlecraft.

Sold from 1982, and therefore predating the two progenitors of the dedicated multi-purpose vehicle, the Chrysler minivans and the Renault Espace, the Space Cruiser was certainly more van-like, both in its upright cab-over silhouette and in the way it drove. But at under 14 feet in length it could seat eight, with sliding side doors and rear benches that could lie flat, to create, as the brochure put it, “a convenient bed.”

Like most on this list, heavy use from families when new followed by even harder part-time-van duties from subsequent owners mean the Space Cruiser’s survival rate is low, and even if you can find one, a combination of a 77-hp 1.8-liter four and a curb weight of over 2800 lbs means progress is sedate. But how great would this snapshot of 1980s family life look parked alongside a contemporary Toyota AE86 Corolla or A60 Supra?

Volkswagen Type 2

VW-Type-2-Bus front three quarter
Volkswagen

The OG of the people-mover . . . err, movement, has to be the original Volkswagen bus, doesn’t it? The Type 2 van was launched all the way back in 1949, decades before most imitators, though in fairness to those above, the Transporter and its ilk were very much commercial vehicles first and dedicated people-carriers second. They drive like it, too.

Most desirable and valuable is a 23-window bus from the 1950s and 1960s; best value of the original rear-engined models is the T3, or T25 (as found in the 2021 Hagerty Bull Market, and the 2022 Hagerty U.K. Bull Market lists), while later front-wheel-drive versions are tough, practical, and a lot more car-like to drive—the 2003-on T5 doesn’t quite feel like a classic yet, but the understated 1990-on T4 has similar retro appeal to other 1990s Volkswagens.

If being van-based doesn’t do much for the Transporter’s driving characteristics or refinement levels, it does at least confer amazing practicality, and while converting some of the other minivans here into overnight campers might be tricky, there’s an enormous aftermarket willing to trade the VW’s seats for beds, kitchens, and more.

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: Your Handy 1959–68 Sunbeam Alpine Buyer’s Guide

Comments

    You couldn’t list them all, but the later Fiat Multipla you included is not a van. The Eurovan is not nearly as cool as the earlier VW vans and perhaps should have been included. They are “refined” in comparison to earlier VW vans but have lost any “VW coolness”. With the VR6, they have plenty of power and drive like a top heavy Jetta. (Wifey wanted a cheap pop top van with AC so despite my vow to never buy another VW, we bought a red one and named it Coke)

    You include the VW but the Econoline was really the first American minivan. It sat on a 90 inch wheelbase, shorter that the VW, sat 8 adults and was EPA rated at 30 mpg with the aerodynamics of a brick. They are still fairly affordable and unlike the later minivans are easy to work on.

    Umm…Econoline 1961, EPA1970. Last 90 inch wb Econoline 1967. First EPA fuel economy ratings 1973.
    I never found it easy to work on a forward-control vehicle (engine between the seats) but that’s just my opinion.
    As far as cool, though, you are right on the money. All of the mid-sixties American vans were neat. My personal preference is the Dodge A100 but that’s just from childhood experience.

    In my early life… I owned a owned ’62 CHEVY GREENBRIER loaded my ’73 Honda CB350F in the lower floor diagonally and headed to Quebec to live,work, and tour in ’75.
    Later, I bought a DODGE CARAVAN, powered by Mitsubishi.
    I traded the DODGE in for CHEVY ASTRO, powered by a 4.3 with a 4bbl!
    RATING?
    1. ASTRO – V6 4bbl and RWD, truck tough
    2. GREENBRIER – sheer fun to drive and maintain
    3. CARAVAN – versatile but underpowered

    PS… my Chevy-loving brother bought an FORD ARROWSTAR and drove it forever!

    Had a Plymouth Voyager long ago when we had two kids in car seats. It drove fine and the layout was very practical. Unfortunately, the build quality and reliability were so poor I haven’t purchased a Chrysler/Stellantis since. Lately, someone in my neighborhood bought a Pontiac Aztek and cleaned it up. Call me crazy, but all these years later it doesn’t look so bad, especially when compared to some of the ugly toad crossover SUVs being perpetuated by BMW and Mercedes these days!

    One correction. The first Caravan/Voyagers had a maximum seating capacity of 7, not 8. Otherwise, good article. I still have a 2013 Grand Caravan that mostly just hauls air now that the kids are grown.

    Nope-early Caravoyagers could be had with a front split bench and seatbelts (not space) for nine. A friend had an early base model Caravan with the bench and a 2.2/ 5 speed.

    The 88-89 Turbo 5 speed was peak Caravan. 140 hp and light weight. Had one but the wife hated it being standard.
    Previas were spacious but underpowered. Had 2 or 3

    A co-worker bought a Caravan turbo/automatic van back about 1990. It was quicker (and of course roomier) than his Escort 5-speed wagon had been.

    We have a hand-me-down 1990 Voyager (short wheelbase, 5-passenger model), with about 49,000 miles, in really nice condition. While not quick, this lighter configuration allows the 3.0 V6/3-speed automatic to propel it with some pep. RPM is a bit higher than optimal on the highway, but no worse than an early-1970’s American car with “normal” rear gears. As with many 1980’s-designed vehicles, though, it has plenty of rattles.

    I read of folks calling the GM plastic vans “Dustbusters”, but in my area of the Midwest, that term was usually used for the Aerostar.

    Lots of Chryslers in this family But I did have a Windstar out of necessity because the full sized Chevy van drank too much fuel. But the minis were the cat’s fanny for doing deliveries when you had to pay for your own fuel.

    BTW the ex got the 89 Plymouth Voyager with the 2.5 Turbo that was a fun one to take on the delivery route!!

    I would never buy another Dodge Caravan without seats that fold into the floor. Heavy d@#% ungainly things to lift out of the older vans and then try to find room to store them. Threw them away except one captain chair.

    I spent many miles in various fleet Ford Aerostars belonging to the mighty GW – USS George Washington – and they were frightening at highway speed. The rear end would bob up and down at the slightest undulation in the smooth Norfolk to Virginia Beach highway. We also had Ford Explorers, and as terrible as they were, they were hands-down better than the ‘Star.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Please enter a valid email address

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.