1988 Cadillac Cimarron: Tweaking the Usual Suspects Since 1982!

Thomas Klockau

This is a car I’ve long wanted to write up. I can’t begin to emphasize how much vitriol this car has generated over the past forty-odd years. Even today, thirty-six years after the last one was built and sold, the Cimarron still generates such, ahem, polarizing discussion. Frequently omitted from discussion is the fact that every GM division had a variant of this car.

Thomas Klockau

In addition to the Cavalier and the Cimarron, there were also Pontiac (Sunbird), Oldsmobile (Firenza), and Buick (Skyhawk) versions. While the Sunbird and Cav lasted all the way to the final year of this body style in 1994, the Cimarron exited stage left, along with the Firenza, in 1988. The Skyhawk followed suit after the 1989 model year.

Thomas Klockau

Probably the biggest issue was pricing: the inaugural ’82 model cost $12,181. To compare, a Cavalier CL four-door sedan, the top trim level, started at $8137. To put that in perspective, an ’82 Caprice Classic sedan was $8437, and a Corvette $18,290. A base 1982 Sedan de Ville started at $15,699.

Thomas Klockau

But keep in mind the Cimarron was put into production to appease Cadillac dealers who were growing more and more concerned about the higher-end imports, like the Volvo GL, BMW 320i, and others. At any rate, 1982 Cimarron production totaled 25,968 units.

Thomas Klockau

Some folks feel the Cimarron was slow, especially in its early form, but they rarely discuss the similar power—or lack thereof—of its European competition. As my friend Ralph related some time ago during a discussion of higher-end early ’80s sedans:

“Since we’re wildly and dramatically talking about how slow the Cimarron was—allegedly there is still someone trying to get to 60 mph in 1982 and he still hasn’t gotten there …

“Let’s post some real numbers …

82 Cimmy
0–60 mph: 13.7
1/4 19.5 @ 70 mph
Flat-out: 91 mph

Volvo 240GL
0–60 mph: 10.9 seconds
1/4 mile: 17.8 seconds @ 75 mph
Flat-out: 99 mph

Accord SE
0–60 mph: 13.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 19.1 seconds @ 69 mph
Flat-out: 92 mph

Audi 4000
0–60 mph: 13.3 seconds
1/4 mile: 18.7 @ 71 mph
Flat-out: 93 mph

BMW 320i
0–60 mph: 10.4 seconds
1/4 mile: 17.5 seconds @ 76 mph
Flat-out: 101 mph

“The 320i was clearly the 426 Hemi of this three-legged dog race. I’m wondering how any of these cars got off the car carrier.”

Thomas Klockau

And like so many GM vehicles over the years, the Cimarron was steadily improved. What most people seem to remember is how much it looked like the Cavalier, but I believe they were thinking of the ’84 facelift, which admittedly looked a lot like the ’82 Cimarron from the front. Thing is, one year later the Cimarron got a grille similar to the de Ville/Fleetwood, and the original ’82 Cavalier fascia, with its twin headlamps, was a much different look. When the ’82 was brand new, that comparison wouldn’t have been made, though of course the overall body shape was identical. But that was the case for the Sunbird, Firenza, and Skyhawk as well.

Thomas Klockau

My favorite is the 1987–88 model, with the aero fascia with flush headlamps and grille similar to the noses of the ’87 Coupe de Ville, Sedan de Ville, and Fleetwood d’Elegance. I love them, and have for a long time.

Cadillac

This is almost certainly due to my very first Chicago Auto Show attendance in February 1988. I was just a car-crazed third grader going nuts seeing cars of every shape and size, and as I was wandering about with my parents I remember seeing a burgundy Cimarron with a burgundy leather interior.

Thomas Klockau

I wanted to sit in it and check out the interior, but it was locked and there was a discreet card under the wiper stating ‘Car sold.’ But of course I got a brochure and thought it was really cool the Cimarron in the brochure was the same color combo as the one at the show!

Thomas Klockau

By 1987 all Cimarrons came standard with the 2.8-liter V-6, which developed 125 hp @ 4500 rpm and 160 lb-ft of torque at 3600 rpm. The aforementioned composite headlamps were now standard on all models (in ’86 only the d’Oro version and late-production regular models got them). Base price by this time was $15,032 and 14,561 were built. The second least expensive 1987 Cadillac was the Coupe de Ville, at $21,316.

Photo of new Cimarrons taken by my friend Ray.Ray Flynn

’88 was the last year and there were few changes. The most noticeable was that all cars now had standard, color-keyed lower side cladding, though a contrasting color could still be specified. Base price was now $16,071 and only 6454 were produced. (Other 1988 retail prices: Chrysler LeBaron GTS $12,971; Lincoln Continental Signature Series $27,944; Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z $13,490, Buick Electra T-Type $20,229 and Oldsmobile Toronado $20,598). And with that, the Cimarron disappeared for good, though the name would carry on in the thoughts and minds of many, to the present day.

Thomas Klockau

Our featured car (I am not 100 percent sure if it was an ’87 or an ’88, Silver Frost was an available color both years) was spotted by your author, right here in town, back in autumn 2015. It wasn’t perfect, but was in exceptionally nice condition, still with the McLaughlin Cadillac dealer sticker on the trunk lid. They’re still in business, by the way. And they still sell Cadillacs!

Thomas Klockau

***

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Read next Up next: Made in Turin, Powered by Dearborn—Record Price for This Intermeccanica Italia
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    My grandfather had one, bought new in ’84 – it was a Cadillac as far as he was concerned – which was his go-to brand. Both of my grandfathers drove Caddies, but this was my Dad’s dad – he would drive his Caddy til the wheels fell off. My Mom’s dad preferred the land yacht variants, which he would lease and re-up every two years.

    I agree with most. Not necessarily a bad car, but not $4000 (in the first year) worth of added value over the top Cavalier model. Not really much at all! So looking and driving (I think they did tweak the suspension some though) like a fancy Chevy at a budget Cadillac price just doesn’t sit well, especially when you can’t pick the Caddy out of a parking lot full of Cavaliers… at least not from a distance.

    My wife and I had an 82 Cavalier that we loved. When it was totaled in a wreck we went and test drove a Cimarron, thinking we would “upgrade”. Boy were we dissappointed. The fit and finish of it looked far worse than that of our Cavalier, and the price was considerably more. I really don’t see how they actually sold any of them. We stuck with the Chevrolet version.

    I like the idea of small luxury cars, trouble is GM just couldn’t make them.
    GM roundly deserved to go bankrupt after the stuff it pulled in the 80s-2000s.

    I did test drive a 1982 Buick Skyhawk, two-time silver/dark silver. It looked nice, but in the end I got a second generation Scirocco which I had for 5 years, which wasn’t the paragon of reliability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *