“I’m Tired”: Even After Closing NASCAR Museum, Owner Fights New Lawsuits
“This has been painful,” says Will Spencer, owner of the Winston Cup Museum in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which featured NASCAR-related displays from the 32-year era when NASCAR’s top class was referred to as Winston Cup. On December 16, 2023, almost 20 years after the museum opened, Spencer was forced to close it for good.
It may be unfair to say that the sole reason for the shutdown is lawsuits filed by the current owner of Winston cigarettes, ITG Brands, but there’s little doubt that they were a contributing factor. Most of the contents of Spencer’s museum, including 33 race cars and other memorabilia, went up for auction last weekend at Mecum’s Kissimmee 2024 event in Florida.
“They hate me,” says Spencer of ITG. After reading some of the filings, it’s hard to argue. “ITG heats up personal accusations to Spencer in museum dispute,” ran the headline for a January 10 story in the Winston-Salem Journal.
The NASCAR Winston Cup era began in 1971 when the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, owner of Winston cigarettes, signed a deal with NASCAR to brand its top series as the Winston Cup. It was a brilliant move for both companies—to refer to the NASCAR series, you had to mention its sponsor. NASCAR soared in popularity. The deal lasted until 2003, when Nextel assumed the sponsorship.
That was the period Spencer wanted to honor with the Winston Cup Museum, which opened in 2005. Most of the museum’s displays, especially the retired race cars it featured, were from that era.
Things changed in 2015, when tobacco companies Reynolds and Lorillard merged. The Federal Trade Commission insisted that the company divest itself of four brands. ITG—short for Imperial Tobacco Group, a subsidiary of British conglomerate Imperial Brands—was formed to acquire Winston, Salem, Kool, and Maverick, as well as Blu e-cigarettes. While Spencer’s main business, a sign company, still counts R.J. Reynolds as a regular customer, the relationship with ITG soured.
The lawsuits began three years ago. “Because ITG owns the Winston brand, the company argued that it owned the Winston-branded artifacts the museum possessed. The claims were dismissed twice,” said TobaccoReporter.com. Spencer considered rebranding the museum, “but it would have been like taking Old Yeller and naming it Blue. I knew it would never be the same. It just wouldn’t be in my heart.”
ITG has continued to sue Spencer, with the most recent motions coming after the museum closed. ITG’s law firm, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphery & Leonard, of Greensboro, North Carolina, where ITG is headquartered, filed an eight-page affidavit four days after Christmas, insisting again that Spencer be held in criminal contempt of court. That affidavit was amended January 8 and expanded to 20 pages with narration from Glen Tibbits, senior vice president of marketing at ITG. It cites a YouTube video hosted by a motorsports historian named Mitchell Stapleton.
That December motion quotes Stapleton in the opening moments of the video, which is one hour and 19 minutes long: “There are some things you got to know about Will Spencer and the Winston Cup Museum before we get going. If you’re a race fan you’ve probably seen the articles about the Winston Cup Museum having to close on December 16th, 2023, and maybe you’ve seen the stuff about the lawsuits surrounding it [that] the questionable-at-best United States judicial system has allowed a large company to bully this guy into closing his museum.”
ITG is complaining not about what Spencer said about the company in the video, but what the YouTube host, who posts as Stapleton42, said. Yet the motion holds Spencer responsible. ITG claims to have been “disparaged and defamed” by the video—a video that fewer people may have seen were it not for the publicity ITG generated by its legal actions.
Spencer and his wife, Christy, argue that the costs of defending the lawsuits in general, and trying to keep the museum going in particular, have been financially taxing. ITG dismisses their argument: “Defendants have claimed in multiple public posts that the financial costs to rebrand is too much—thus they are going to auction all of their Winston Cup related cars and memorabilia… That is objectively false. Just one of the cars, a Dodge Daytona, is estimated to sell for more than $750,000 at auction… Considering that Defendants could sell one car to pay for all of the rebranding, financial constraints are not the issue.”
That 1969 Dodge Daytona, a former Dave Marcis superspeedway car, received a high bid of just $225,000 and did not sell. We aren’t sure who “estimated” for ITG what old race cars are worth, but they need some remedial instruction. It didn’t help that the selection of Spencer’s cars and souvenirs—billed, without any mention of Winston, as “The Rise of NASCAR’s Modern Era Museum Collection”—sold on the afternoon of the final day of the 13-day auction, when presumably a lot of the bidders’ money had been spent.
In fact, all but a few of the 33 cars that Spencer brought to auction were sold at “no reserve,” and prices for the most part were modest. A 1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS, complete with a 700-horsepower V-8 (some of Spencer’s cars had everything but the engine) that was built by Junior Johnson and driven by former Cup champions Darrell Waltrip and Terry Labonte, in full Budweiser livery, went for just $62,700.
A 2008 Toyota Camry raced by Cup champion Dale Jarrett went for $9900. A 1995 Pontiac Grand Prix driven by Kyle Petty sold for $14,300. A 1996 Monte Carlo, raced by Waltrip in 1995 and 1996, sold for $9900. A 1994 Ford Thunderbird raced by Cup champion Bill Elliott went for $27,500. Incredibly, a rare, restored 1957 Ford, driven by Glenn “Fireball” Roberts to eight victories in ’57, drew a high bid of just $40,000 and didn’t sell.
Not surprisingly, the highest bid was on a former Dale Earnhardt 1995 Chevrolet Monte Carlo in black Goodwrench livery; it went for $348,700. The majority of Spencer’s collection of painted hoods, drivers’ helmets, gloves, and retired uniforms each went for $1500 or less—often much less. (DeWalt fire suit autographed by Cup champion Matt Kenseth: $590. Dave Blaney Amoco fire suit: $236.)
It’s true that Winston and ITG have been disparaged, but more by the media than by Spencer. “Museum closes its doors after years of lawsuits,” was the headline for a story on SpeedwayDigest.com. “NASCAR museum shut following lawsuits,” ran the title of a story on TobaccoReporter.com. “Family-owned NASCAR museum shut down thanks to greedy tobacco company,” wrote Jalopnik.com.
Spencer, 63, went to his first NASCAR race in 1971, the year the Winston sponsorship began. He went with friends, staying in their Winnebago in the infield of Rockingham Speedway. “Sunday, we rode down to between turns 1 and 2 on Honda Mini Trail 50s, and watched Richard Petty, Cale Yarborough, and Bobby Allison and everybody go after it. I came home and started building model race cars. I still have my Buddy Baker one.”
He founded JKS Incorporated in 1984, which began as a sign and display company but grew into a full-service firm after adding manufacturing and fabrication services, as well as a marketing department, which develops trade show displays and brand experience events.
Much of the company’s work involved motorsports, and Spencer, since that first race 53 years ago, has never strayed far from NASCAR—he managed the show car fleet for Reynolds and a variety of teams. He often acquired wrecked Cup cars and rebuilt them into show cars. “The joke was that they’d wreck the car on Sunday, and Will would buy it on Monday,” Spencer said. “At one time, I had over a hundred of them.”
Spencer and his wife started the Winston Cup Museum as a gift to the city of Winston-Salem and to NASCAR fans, preserving an era in which NASCAR grew from a regional sport to a major national one. “It was probably the most important 32 years NASCAR ever had,” he said.
“In 2003, I realized that if I didn’t save the stuff I had, and put it together collectively, you would never be able to gather it back up again. Once it’s gone, it’s gone. So I spent a whole year making sure that what we had didn’t end up in a dumpster. The pictures, the trophies, the awards, I saved everything. In December of 2003, I was the last man out.” He literally removed the NASCAR photos from the walls of the R.J. Reynolds offices.
So he took an old Nash dealership, gutted it, and built a museum. “It never made any money, and it never would,” he said, adding that it lost an average of $50,000 a year.
“I feel like we kept it alive for nearly 20 years, but I’ve been fighting 800-pound gorillas,” he said. “I got myself into a pickle.” What does he guess all this has cost him? “It’s really hard to put a dollar figure on it,” he said, “but in all it’s been a two-million-dollar hit, just to have it taken away.”
The next court date, at which he’ll answer ITG’s charges of criminal contempt, is February 6. “I might go to jail for it, but I’ll keep fighting. It’s unrelenting, and it has been going on for three years. I’m tired.”
ITG may win the battle, and the law firm of Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphery & Leonard may continue to compound billable hours, but there’s no argument that they’ve lost the public relations war.
Maybe it’s the difference between doing something for money and doing it for love.
***
Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.
The people need to stick together and do ITG brands like the fans did Bud Light. Hit them greedy stock holders where it hurts
Does the ITG argument mean that everything within “Winston-Salem” city boundaries belongs to them?
Just sarcastically wondering. . . . . .
I lived in Winston-Salem for 35 years and visited this museum several times. In my opinion, it was little different from the museums at Richard Childress Racing in Welcome, NC, and the Richard Petty museum in Randleman, NC. They all had cars with with Winston Cup logos. It was a part of NASCAR history. Are ITG going to target these museums next? How about the NASCAR museum in Charlotte, NC? Is no one safe from bottom-feeding corporate lawyers?
Yup, just my opinion, but no foreign corporation or foreign citizen should be allowed to own “property” in the United States — they can rent, but never own.
How ironic that Winston ran the “No Bull” promotion; now it’s evolved to the “ALL BULL” retribution to someone who legitimately purchased products and memorabilia to preserve an era in NASCAR racing. Without benefit of reviewing the court documents, I can’t fathom how such a bogus ruling could have been reached. Corporate greed at it’s worst. Shameful.
Just a thought but maybe Nascar didnot want its past history shown any more,after all what they market now is junk to watch
This is a sad story and reeks of corporate greed.
Many of us auto enthusiasts do not read the journals that were cited in this article, papers that were covering this developing story while it was current. It’s a rotten shame that Hagerty, Hemmings, or any other of the major bloggers in this arena didn’t get ahead of this story and bring it out prior to the auto auction of these historic artifacts. Now all we can do is hang our heads and comment “what a shame.” I myself would be interested in Hagerty or SOME AUTO JOURNALISM FIRM championing the defense of this couple who are obviously being trampled by ITG, a British cigarette conglomerate.
Heck, I sense that this could be the subject of a nice country-western lament, or how about Netflix picking up on this David & Goliath tale of woe? There’s a solid story here and it’s not over yet.
Reading about ITG reminds me of this joke. A real estate magnate and his lawyer head to a small town in Texas to buy up thousands of acres of property. To fit in with locals they dress up in cowboy boots and ten gallon hats. Next they pick up a dog at the pound. Next day they go to a local watering hole. While sitting at the bar a person comes in and walks over to the dog and lifts the dog’s tail up and looks under it then drops it down and leaves. This happens several times. The two fake cowboys ask the bartender why people are doing that. Bartender replies “ Everyone in town heard there was a dog in the bar with two A-holes”
And the next day, the bartender sold out to the developers for a healthy profit, and moved to Florida…
There are dangerous legal precedents that could emerge from this case. Some readers have already noted potential scenarios.
A reasonable judge or appellate court should find, or should have already found that whomever owned Winston in 2003 relinquished all claims (and responsibilities)to racing promotional material when they were no longer allowed, by law, to continue motor sports marketing. Their contracts for ‘leasing’ advertising space from NASCAR, car owners etc., ended and any claims had no merit.
It’s all very disconcerting for race fans, fans of free enterprise, and fans of historical preservation. If ITC did nothing, it had a building full of free marketing.
As has been noted, there is something wrong at a deeper level.
The law firm should be boycotted too for doing the unethical deed.
So glad I quit tobacco in 1984. These greedy a-hole never got another nickel of mine and never will.
Way to many lawyers in this country with nothing better to do than destroy peoples lives. Just another reason to forget about NASCAR all together. They’ve made it stupid with their stop and go races. I quit watching. Now they don’t help a guy out that tried to keep it alive.
Every day we see evidence that our USA legal system has been derailed. Just one more example.
Countersue for the nonsense since it’s already been dismissed by a court twice. This is yet another example as to why our “justice” system is such a farce.