How Collectible Are Those 2000s Retro-Style Cars?
It’s about to be 2025, and that has us looking back a quarter of a century to the dawn of the new millennium. In the year 2000, Nokia released the indestructible 3310 cell phone, Sony released the PlayStation 2, and people were getting unlimited music for free on Napster. Kevin Spacey won the Oscar for Best Actor, back when people still liked Kevin Spacey. Lance Armstrong won his second Tour de France, back when people still liked Lance Armstrong. The population of India reached 1 billion, the Elián González case was all over the news, and the Olympic Games were on NBC. DJ Carl Cox rang it in with two consecutive New Year’s Eve shows (the first in Sydney, then another in Hawaii after flying back over the International Date Line), and Y2K didn’t happen.
There was a lot of future talk in the late 1990s and early 2000s, but in the car world a lot of manufacturers looked to the past. Styling cues from the 1930s, ’50s and ’60s made it onto both concept cars and showroom models throughout both decades. These “retro cars” started even earlier in the ’90s with Japanese companies, or arguably even earlier with the first 1989 Miata, which aped the 1960s Lotus Elan. Nissan came shortly after with retro cars like the Be-1, Pao and Figaro, while Toyota had the “Classic.” VW came out with the retro-look New Beetle in 1997 and Jaguar with the S-Type in 1999. BMW brought out ’50s 507 curves with the Z8 in 1999, and revived the Mini for 2001. Fiat played on ’50s and ’60s dolce vita with its revived 500 model in 2007. Toyota brought FJ40 Land Cruiser looks to the 20th century with its FJ Cruiser that same year.
Here at home, the Big Three did retro cars, too. Old-school styling came in through the muscle car revival with the 2005 Mustang, 2008 Challenger and 2010 Camaro. Further up, supercar buyers had the 1960s race car looks of the 2005-06 Ford GT, and further down, commuters with a taste for something different had the 2001-10 Chrysler PT Cruiser and 2006-11 Chevy HHR.
Three domestic retro cars, however, exemplify this design trend more than any other—the 2002-05 Thunderbird, 1999-2002 Prowler, and 2003-06 Chevy SSR. They’re over the top and perhaps a bit tacky, but in the context of today’s monochrome pill-shaped crossovers, it’s remarkable that they were built at all. Now that they’re getting old enough to be classics, how does the market treat them? And do these cars, which played on nostalgia when they were new, appeal to a new type of owner today?
2002-05 Ford Thunderbird
The 11th generation Ford Thunderbird was the very last, and ironically (or maybe poetically?) it took inspiration from the very first 1955-57 T-Birds, right down to the bright old-school colors and two-seat configuration. The T-Bird for the New Millennium shared its chassis and 3.9-liter V-8/5-speed automatic with Ford corporate cousins like the Jaguar S-Type and Lincoln LS while its wide grille, circular lights, hood scoop and available porthole hardtop were shameless ’50s throwbacks that contrasted hugely with the contemporary blandness of the 10th generation (1989-97) Thunderbird that came before it. The 2002-05 T-Bird isn’t sporty, but Ford never claimed it was.
Prices when new ranged from $35,495 for the base car to $39,795 with the porthole hardtop, and a limited run of 200 Neiman Marcus versions sold through the retailer’s famous Christmas catalog. A coral-colored T-Bird also got some screen time with Halle Berry in the 2002 Bond film Die Another Day and Ford, never one to miss a marketing opportunity, built 700 “007” edition Thunderbirds like the one in the movie.
Values for these cars haven’t done much, and they’re roughly where they were a decade ago. The median condition #2 (“excellent”) value is $22,800, and #3 (“good”) is $11,300. The Neiman Marcus edition commands a little more at $25,800 in #2, and the most valuable is the 50th Anniversary at $29,500. Despite a build date that put them in the same company as many millennial and Gen Z favorites, T-Birds are way more popular with Florida retirees than they are with 20-something gearheads. Of the insurance quotes Hagerty gets for 2002-05 Thunderbirds, nearly two-thirds come from baby boomers, while just 2 percent come from millennials and 1 percent from Gen Z. This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise, though. These T-Birds were a 1950s nostalgia play when they were new, so it makes sense that they have the same core audience today.
1997-2002 Plymouth/Chrysler Prowler
Chrysler went absolutely wild in the 1990s with retro-styled concept cars like the Atlantic and the Chronos, but the Prowler is one that, remarkably, made it to production. After the Prowler concept was a star of the 1993 Detroit Auto Show, Chrysler execs led by president Bob Lutz and design chief Tom Gale greenlit the 1930s throwback for the road.
The Prowler has been called a love letter to hot rods, but giving it a shrug-worthy 3.5-liter V-6 and 4-speed automatic was like writing that letter in crayon. To be fair, that V-6 was the only engine that would fit, and the Prowler’s structure featured extensive and advanced-for-the-time bonded aluminum. It was also just about the wildest-looking car you could drive out of a showroom in the late 1990s. But the Prowler will always be remembered for writing a check the powertrain couldn’t cash. About 11,700 were built, the last of them given Chrysler badges after the Plymouth brand disappeared in 2001.
We picked the Prowler for this year’s Hagerty Bull Market list, in which we select cars that are poised to grow in value, but it appears our crystal ball was a little foggy on that one. This is another car that’s worth almost exactly what it was a decade ago. The median condition #2 value is currently $31,900, and #3 is $25,300. The $5000 optional matching trailer is a bit of a gimmick, but gimmicks are fun and cars equipped with it can command a significant premium. So can certain colors like purple or yellow.
Few cars at this price point will grab people’s attention like a Prowler, but its hot rod heritage hasn’t translated to younger enthusiasts. Over 61 percent of buyer interest for Prowlers comes from baby boomers, while just 7 percent comes from millennials and less than 1 percent from Gen Z.
2003-06 Chevrolet SSR
Like the Prowler, there’s simply no way to ignore a Chevy SSR on the road. Similarly, it’s a completely ridiculous thing that, whether you love it or hate it, you have to be impressed that GM actually built it. Chevrolet first displayed the SSR (Super Sport Roadster) as a concept at the 2000 Detroit Auto Show. Given its looks and the simple fact that it was a two-seater convertible pickup truck, most people thought it would stay a concept. And yet it arrived in Chevy showrooms for the 2003 model year.
The SSR shares a platform with the contemporary TrailBlazer EXT, and the first examples got its 5.3-liter, 300-hp V-8 with a 4-speed automatic as well. Car and Driver said of the looks: “Part roadster, part truck, and part Van Halen, it’s a retro Yankee wrapped in concept-car spandex.”
In 2005, things got better when Chevrolet dropped in the LS2 V-8 from the C6 Corvette and Pontiac GTO, bumping performance to 390 hp and 405 lb-ft of torque. Remarkably, Chevrolet also offered a Tremec 6-speed manual. The SSR got a few more horsepower for 2006 (400 with the manual, 395 with the auto). This impractical, outrageous-looking pickup with the heart of a Corvette could keep up with most mid-level sports cars. In a straight line, at least.
While certainly eye-catching and fast enough for fun, the SSR cost over $40K when new and wasn’t a smash hit. It was basically too much of a sports car for truck buyers, and too much of a truck for sports car buyers. About 24,000 were built in total.
Today, the median condition #2 value for SSRs is $32,600, and #3 is $25,100. This is up slightly from the $29,400 value for #2 condition cars a decade ago, but not enough to keep up with inflation. LS2-powered versions are worth a few grand more than the 2003-04 versions, and 6-speeds carry a $5000 premium in our price guide. When it comes to buyer interest, there are few vehicles that skew more towards older customers than this one. Over 82 percent of insurance quotes for the SSR come from baby boomers or older, while just 3 percent come from millennials and 0(!) percent come from Gen Z.
I went looking to buy a used SSR but they didn’t make one in white, strange ! Also watch for Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky. I’ve got a 2011 white HHR, love it,
Also have a 1998 Z28.
I don’t have any issue with retro styling in and of itself as long as its wrapped around a car that’s worth driving.
For me that’s a manual transmission only, great handling, and enough power to suit the chassis and be fun.
The re-boot of the MINI Cooper and Fiat 500 Arbath come to mind.
A boulevard cruiser that looks good but that’s all doesn’t do it for me. A powerful motor makes it a little better but I want a little more than a one trick pony.
Maintaining a collectible from pre-80’s era remains substantially more possible than post-80’s, so I don’t think any of these cars will hold much value as static collectables, but that may be their likely fate as the 20-30 year old electronics, plastics and related switchgear fails, unless the aftermarket picks up (doubtful given relatively low volume and demand.)
I am a proud owner of a 2000 Prowler and still love it. Yes, smaller engine but honestly, it’s all you need with a light car on curvy mountain roads and no problem going up mountain passes. And I had nooo problem leading a group of Prowlers at 100+ mph in SD from Wall Drug back to Deadwood. A very fun ride and always a head-turner.
NOTE – Hagerty hasn’t done their homework on current interest. Lots of recent sales to 40+ year olds (mostly men) who are excited to customize. The sale prices are all over the place – it seems to be car and buyer-specific.
I think Ford missed the boat when they didn’t add small fins on their 2002-05 T-Bird, IMHO.
I would pick the T-Bird, a 2002 in “Thunderbird Blue”. Second would be an SSR (my Millennial daughter really likes them, so a few young folks understand); being a convertible, and capable of towing a small boat or camper, would make it more practical. Never much liked the Prowler, but then I was never really into hot rods, either – although I can appreciate the artwork of a really clean build.
Oh, and don’t forget – the 21st century did not start until January 1, 2001 – contrary to popular (misinformed) belief.
i had a 2005 SSR in Yellow. Loved it. in 2009, someone made me an offer that I couldn’t refuse! Wish I still had it today!!!
Why is the PT Cruiser not on the list. We owned one for several years and still miss not having a PT. The car was roomy, versatile, practical and provided fair mileage. As a 6’5″ person I was always impressed how comfortable the car was. We traded it for a Toyota Highlander and I always regretted not having the comfort of the PT. The only negative of the Cruiser was lack of power and the 60’s steering response. My wife and I have often talked about finding a good used PT as we miss the car.
Have a 2005 SSR 6 speed. Good vehicle. Probably will get the Thunderbird (have a 62) and the Prowler at some time.
No doubt they are collectable. Great styling.,dependable and all the modern comforts except for the big screen tv on the dash. I’ll add a few more, altough not all from the 2000s. Crossfire, magnum wagon,pt cruiser,sky solstice ,the last of the gm and ford rwd v8s., and almost any station wagon.
Not too many folks wanted these cars when they were new. I can’t see that changing soon.
Bought a well cared for 02 TBird in 2006. Opened up the exhaust and intake for a good boost in performance. The open diff and traction control which feathers back the engine required some stickier tires to get a little more from it. I thought seriously about swapping it to a stick shift from a Jag, but I got used to manually shifting the auto. It’s not a rocket ship, but not a slouch either. Great cruiser. I actually get many more stares and thumbs up from the very young generation who has never been close to one. My grandson who is a few months from getting his full license is crazy about it. I thought he was in love with my 85 F150 but he finally told me he thought the TBird was too rare to touch. With a Porsche and an AMG sitting in the driveway (he sees them everywhere), he’s attracted to the TBird?? After a couple of test drives. “You want it? Get your license and insurance and come get it.” ( Big Smile) You just never know about the younger generation deciding what’s cool.
I’d love to see more stories about buyer demographics for all different collector cars.
There is a lot of talk about bigger more powerful engines. What in the world does that do for the car? Yes it makes it go faster. I’ll stipulate to that. It also adds under steer, brake wear and increases gas consumption. My 96 ci Porsche has 74 HP and tops out at 109 mph. I am very capable of scaring myself with that. I go on rallies with the local Porsche Dealership. I can get the same speeding ticket as a new 911. The interesting thing is that I have more fun rowing my car to maintain speed than they do just cruising along. Nothing has changed in the old adage that its a lot more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow. To me a big engine with a lot of horsepower serves as bragging rights. Nothing to do with the fun factor.
Even the Challengers, Chargers, and Camaro’s are the PT Cruisers of muscle cars. At least the Mustang never, ever gave up. When a car company’s best ideas are 60, 70 years old, it’s time to look at Tesla. Imposters are imposters and everyone knows it. Although you can still get elected.
I have NEVER purchased a car with any thought as to its future value in the marketplace. I buy them because I love each and every one of them! I will keep each one until I leave this mortal coil. My stable includes my 1990 Thunderbird SC (12k miles), 2005 Crossfire Roadster (18k miles) 2005 Thunderbird Cashmere Edition (20k miles), a 2006 XLR-V (12k miles) and my 2024 Mustang GT Performance Convertible (2k miles). I could care less about future value-just enjoy the ride!