Highs and lows of the Camaro, by generation
With the Camaro nameplate retiring soon, we’re honoring the beloved two-door with a series of love letters, fun lists, and memories. Many performance cars, especially nowadays, aim for an anodyne version of perfection that only a few can afford. The Camaro is for the rest of us—and it’s always ready to party. Still, we can’t pretend the car we’re about to celebrate over the next week or so is perfect. That in mind, let down your hair and come with us for a deep dive into what, exactly, makes the Camaro so bitchin’. Here: the highs and lows from each of the Camaro’s six generations.
With so many memorable models and so many race-winning performances, it’s difficult to pick just one highlight from each generation of Camaro. Of course, we like to challenge ourselves, so we did exactly that, polling our staff to choose one high and one low from each of the six generations of our favorite Detroit underdog.
We welcome your input as fellow Camaro lovers: What triumphs or notable features did we neglect? Were there any issues that Chevrolet should have caught in development but didn’t? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.
First Generation (1967–69)
High: 1969 Trans-Am–winning Chevrolet Camaro.
AMC and the Big Three put a lot of effort into Trans Am racing in the late ’60s and early ’70s. Notable drivers included Parnelli Jones, Dan Gurney, George Follmer, Jerry Titus, and Mark Donohue. With Roger Penske as his crew chief, Donohue won back-to-back Trans Am championships for Chevrolet in 1968 and 1969 powered by the big-bore, short-stroke 302 V-8 from the Camaro Z/28 which ended production in 1969 and was replaced by the LT-1 the following year.
Low: “Cocktail shaker” dampers on the convertibles.
Removing the roof of the Camaro eliminated a lot of structure, introducing a lot of body flex. The solution was a set of four oil-filled canisters with a suspended weight tuned to absorb the specific frequency at which the body would vibrate. It’s not a particularly elegant solution, and the canisters added about 100 pounds to the Camaro.
Second Generation (1970–81)
High: Pre-’74 Z/28 with all the right options.
There are plenty of ways to build a Camaro, and that degree of personalization is part of the draw of the pony car class. While there’s nothing wrong with a big-block, we’re fans of the Z/28 package, which brought a 350-cubic-inch LT-1 with a solid-lifter cam and a four-barrel carb along with upgrades to the suspension, already improved for the second-gen car. The RS package, shown here, with its redesigned fascia that included round marker lights and an extended grille framed by a split bumper, gave the Camaro a noticeably different look. If you also specced yours with a Hurst four-speed, mag wheels, and stripes—well, you might have the perfect second-gen, in our book.
Low: This generation lived in the shadow of Burt Reynolds’ magnificent mustache and his Bandit Trans Am.
While the Camaro managed to survive the late ’70s with decent styling and sales numbers that eclipsed those of the Mustang (in 1977), the Firebird thrived, especially in Trans Am livery with its over-the-top graphics. A black and gold Trans Am, equipped with T-tops and dressed as a 1977 model, was almost as big a star as Reynolds in the film and has become synonymous with Smokey and The Bandit. Where was the Camaro movie love?
Third Generation (1982–92)
High: IROC with T-tops.
With its liftback cargo area, third-generation Camaro was downright practical, but where it really shone was the style. The IROC, with its signature 16-inch wheels and ground effects, was one of the best-looking pony cars of the ’80s and we think its looks have aged rather well. Starting in 1988, you could also option your IROC with the 1LE package, which added a close-ratio transmission and brakes improved with parts pirated from the Corvette and Caprice.
Low: The big engine came with only an auto. Also, someone kindly tell us what “Berlinetta” means, and why those cars had a datebook on the roof.
While they still look cool, the Tuned Port Injection (TPI) intakes were a bit of a strange choice for a sporty car, because their strength is low-end torque production. The 350 models produced an adequate 245 hp and an impressive 345 lb-ft of torque at the end of the third-gen’s run. The compact and lightweight T5 five-speed transmission, like the one used in contemporary Mustangs as well as in the 305-equipped Camaro, had a maximum torque capacity of 300 lb-ft and thus never found its way into the more powerful and torquey Camaros powered by the TPI 350.
Fourth Generation (1993–02)
High: The B4C-package Camaros produced for police.
The B4C gave the Camaro all of the performance of the Z28 without a lot of the additional options, many of which tacked on extra weight. They were also missing T-tops which seem to be found on most of the high-performance Camaro models. While the Z28 came with a black roof and mirrors, the B4C was painted like a plain old base Camaro, so it was also a bit of a sleeper—provided it didn’t have lights on top or wear police livery.
Low: “Skip shift. ”Also, the service procedure for replacing the rear spark plugs.
The tricky shift procedure could easily be worked around, but the long, steeply angled windshield meant that the engines are tucked way into the cowl on the fourth-gen Camaro. Working on the back of the engine is not going to be a simple task, but at least the plugs have a long service interval.
Fifth Generation (2010–15)
High: The LS7–powered Z/28.
“Imagine presenting to Chevrolet leadership that we wanted to sell a vehicle that had no carpet, no air conditioning, and a trunk that had one speaker just because the seatbelt chime was a requirement, and that we wanted to sell it for more than the Corvette costs. That was a personal win. And the thing was a track beast.”—Al Oppenheiser lead development engineer, fifth- and sixth-generation Camaro
Low: Concept car trunk.
The fifth-gen Camaro returned with concept-car styling, and it was a big hit. However, like the sixth-gen that followed, this Camaro featured a rather average-sized trunk only accessible through a tiny opening. Packing can be a hassle, and large, rigid luggage is a no-go. Pack light, or pick a duffel bag.
Sixth Generation (2016–24)
High: The SS 1LE.
The Alpha platform that underpins the 6th-gen Camaro is an absolute gem, with fantastic road manners and excellent handling and road feel. Chevrolet was nice enough to give us the 1LE package in turbo four, naturally aspirated V-6, naturally aspirated V-8, and supercharged V-8 varieties, so there’s a driver-focused 6th-gen for Camaro fans of every kind. Our favorite, of course, is the SS 1LE: It drives like a BMW M3 but looks, sounds, and hits the wallet like nothing but a Camaro.
Low: Good luck seeing out of the thing.
Visibility in the sixth-generation Camaro isn’t any worse than it is in the fifth-generation, and it’s certainly no worse than many contemporary sports cars. That’s not to say it’s great. However, you get used to the sightlines. You can’t have a roof this low or a profile this sleek without some tradeoffs.
***
Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.
I had a 67 RS convertible, resurrected with the help of a coupe donor car, in the late 70s. I was never sure what the cannisters in the trunk were about, and the front corner ones may have escaped my notice. At least, they weren’t memorable. Thanks for the explanation. I’m trying to figure how they absorb or cancel vibrations, but they must work; I don’t remember a vibration problem. The RS models, and SS/RS ones, had hidden headlights.
I know I’ll get a lot of groans here but a 80s era z24 Cavalier would beat a camaro of the same era light to light and quarter mile more often than not. Yea I had them both.
I have to agree that the skip shift on the 4th gen was the dumbest thing ever. I didn’t know about it when I picked up my ’99 Z/28. What the heck, the car won’t shift into 2nd gear.
Within a week, a skip shift bypass was installed.
I have a ’69 RS convertible that my Dad bought in 1971 from the original owner. Dad drove me to my first day of 1st grade in it, and I’ve done the same for each of my sons.
Don’t know how many of you have heard of it but “Motion Performance” out of New York in the 60s had a 366 ci Camaro that could really get you anywhere in a hurry. I saw this little beast in Sackville, NS, Canada on the Labour Day Drags weekend in 1968. It was probably the only time that this Ford guy wanted a Camaro. It was an awesome car.
I’m glad you chose the 6th gen ss 1LE as a top pick. I’ve owned multiple Porsche 911s turbos and gt3s , a Ferrari, Audi R8, and 5 and 6 gen z06 corvettes…this wil sound strange but the Camaro is my favorite car of all them due to a combination of factors. In the back of my mind I was always a little stressed driving the high end cars on public roads due to the average driver’s abilities. The Corvettes are so low and of course 2 seats only.. I honestly felt more claustrophobic in the Corvettes than the Camaro. I originally had a 2017 ss 1LE which I loved but had a 3 year lease and returned it….couple of other cars later and I realized what an amazing car it was…. Purchased a 2021 ss 1LE and will definitely keep….great driving balance, the car loves to be driven like you stole it, back seat for grandkids, hangs with gt3s at the track…. We call it “ the Goldilocks car”! Not sure if they are still available at dealers but if so highly recommend.
I know the HP went way down after 70 but…Early 70s for me.
Still have my ’69 DZ with factory TI, early build with low miles; currently restoring. Also still have my ’69 SS350/300 low milage. Second owner for both cars. Z would stand up and go. SS was a drag car and always saw lots of sky when I launched it. Looking forward to getting them back on the road again soon.
GM if your reading this DO NOT BRING BACK THE CAMARO nameplate on an electric SUV!!
My favorite is the 4th gen. It was my high school car and I’ve had 6 of them since the current one being a 2000 SS. RIP Camaro again…
’69 RS/SS. 1st Gen. Early 2nd gen RS Z28 with LT1 a close #2 . IMO versus the competitors 6th gen SS is great car but just less usable vs competitors (summer only assymentric tires , small trunk).
I know that if the Camaro didn’t exist then the Firebird wouldn’t have either but I’d argue the Firebird was the better looking version of the car in every generation besides the first gen and obviously the Firebird ended in 02. Even those guys from Florida took a 6th gen Camaro (ugly imo) and turned it into a Trans Am, which looked 100x better. I woulda bought that version of the car if Pontiac was still around.
i had a 1967 camaro with a 396 in it “automatic” i looked through the white book on camaro’s it was very rare with all the option on it i up graded in 1973 to a monte carlo “dumb” i have no idea what it would be worth today but i would like to know my wife drove it all the time was on a first name bases with the cops where we lived “mini dress area”
Had a lot of fun with a 307-Powerglide ’69 transformed with LT-1, angle-plug heads, headers, H-pipe, M21, 12 bolt 3.73, front discs, fast ratio steering box, nitrous. Painted it Hugger Orange with white Z-28 stripes. Good-looking, fun car!
Bought a new ’84 Z-28, L-69 five speed. A big disappointment. Weak engine, but I knew that going in. Poor synchro action, no posi, spread the flimsy diff case which made the axle clonk, cornered different left and right, I think due to the diagonal lateral link in back. Chevy routed the fuel line close to the RH exhaust manifold collector, so lots of fuel-boil problems in hot weather, until the fuel line was insulated (by me). Mine didn’t have T-tops, but friends bought them and they leaked. Door opening cracked at the top rear squared corner. On the other hand, the family I sold mine to hit a deer and the sloped nose shoveled the deer up and over the car, with a slight increase in front edge hood gap the only visible exterior damage! They drove the car until it rusted away.
Still think the ’69 was THE best year, & the 5th & 6th generations look like the star of the “CARS” movie. Just dumb styling. Sorry all you Camaro diehards, but I still see more late model Mustangs & Challengers on the street than Camaros.
So many people hate the big bumper cars of 1974. I bought a ’74 Z/28 sport Coupe off the lot 4 days before my high school graduation and owned it 2 years until got tired of driving it in the snow.
My Camaroless days lasted all of a year as I fell in love with a tricked out loaded ’68 RS/SS honest to god 302 with a TH400 behind it, chambered exhaust and parts counter 4 wheel disc brakes (my brother still has it, 34,000 miles on it). This lasted until marriage and a house came along followed 11 years later by divorce. A month later there was another ’74 Z/28 Type LT in the garage which lasted until kids in college…. you’d think I’d learn
Fast forward to retirement in 2021. Sold my Cosworth Twin Cam and bought a 18,000 mile ’74 Z/28 Type LT with Muncie M-20 and all the options. I’ll keep it until I cant push the clutch peddle in or remember how to.
So Big Bumper Z/28’s are in my blood. I like the newest style and maybe should have bought a new drop top, mpg would be better than the 9mpg my ’74 gets buts lets face it, its not about efficiency is it?
I’ll hold my opinion on whether or not GM should bring it back as an EV, I’ll wait until I can see it if they do. Wont be the same, ever again.