9 4x4s We Want to See Back in Production

Brandan Gillogly

We’re sure that you, like us, appreciate the incredible options manufacturers provide when shopping for a new vehicle. Sports cars are faster, and 4x4s are more capable than ever, but as enthusiasts, we still find ourselves daydreaming about what could be. Hagerty’s media staff brainstormed for a bit to dream up some 4x4s that we’d like to see make a comeback, especially now that there’s an off-road arms race going on with Ford, Chevy, GMC, Ram, Jeep, Nissan, and Toyota all offering off-roaders that can tackle high-speed deserts and technical trails. Our choices may not always make fiscal sense, and you might understand why we’re writing about car companies and not running them after checking this list, but if these off-roaders did make it to production, it would make at least a few off-roaders happy.

Geo/Chevy Tracker

Chevrolet Tracker Two Door Convertible front three quarter black
Chevrolet

I wanna see something like the Geo Tracker—low power, smaller than the current Trax, nothing fancy, but legitimate off-road capability. Bare bones for the base model, but maybe with multiple locking differentials and chunky tires for the performance packages. I’m thinking Suzuki Jimny, but even boxier, and with a Bowtie. The 1.2-liter, 137-hp turbo-three from the Trax would be perfect here with a six-speed.—Eric Weiner

Chevrolet has a lot of crossovers in its lineup, and the Trax is one of the most affordable on the market. The Tracker could be positioned as more of a lifestyle vehicle. There’s already a Chevy Tracker available in Mexico and Central and South America, but it’s front-wheel-drive and not at all aimed at off-road activities. This new Tracker would need a new platform but could also be offered in markets around the globe.

AMC Eagle SX/4

AMC Eagle advertisement
A print ad for the 1983 AMC Eagle SX/4, a sporty two-door liftback.Alden Jewell

Jacked-up safari coupes are all the rage these days, so why not bring back the original lifted coupe, the AMC Eagle SX/4?

Stellantis can take some length out of the new chassis under the Charger, give the Eagle its own—ideally hatchback—bodywork, and use the Hurricane straight-six to power all four wheels. I know AWD doesn’t fully fit the 4×4 brief we have going, but these cars are too funky and cool to be forgotten. —Eddy Eckart

This one checks a lot of boxes. The Charger will already be available in two and four-door liftback variants, and an AMC-appropriate inline-six engine, so it’s really not that far-fetched. Why let Subaru have all the fun in that space?

Mitsubishi Montero/Nissan Xterra

Mitsubishi Montero
Brandan Gillogly

Mitsubishi and Nissan should collaborate to co-develop a body-on-frame SUV with real 4×4 capability and off-road potential. We could call the Mitsubishi version the Montero (no idea why I’d love to see one of those again…) and we could call the Nissan version the XTerra. Sure, it would mean downsizing the Monty from a three-row to a two-row vehicle, but they did make short-wheelbase versions of that thing for a bit.

Use the dead-simple 3.8-liter V-6 from the Frontier pickup, and pair it with a nine-speed automatic. Heck, you could grab most of the running gear from the Frontier, really.

I’d love to see Mitsubishi ascend back to the levels it once reached in the American market. I think that the most realistic avenue for such a rise would be through off-road SUVs.—Nathan Petroelje

This one seems easy, at least for Nissan. The chassis and powertrain are there, ready for the taking.

Open-top Toyota 4Runner

1989 Toyota 4Runner pickup rear
Toyota

Bring back a bare-bones two-door 4Runner with a roll bar and removable top. Build it on the current 4R platform to keep things simple, give it manual everything and the Highlander’s 2.4L turbo, and price it at under $30,000.—Stefan Lombard

This could be Toyota’s shot at competing more directly with open-top 4x4s from Ford and Jeep and using an amortized platform could keep the price down to two-door Wrangler territory. It’s the Toyota 4×4 that enthusiasts have asked for since, well, since the open-top 4Runner left production.

Ford Aerostar

1989 Ford Aerostar neg CN52007-585
Ford

I want the 4×4 Ford Aerostar (okay technically it was All-Wheel Drive) to come back. Ditto the Chevy Astro, but I am a sucker for the ‘Star and its cheese-wedge styling.

There’s something about a “modern” looking people mover designed to replace the station wagon for city duties, but can also tow a small boat and go off-road. Just bring it back as-is but with modern safety features, a turboharged four-banger (because underhood space is tight!) and market the hell out of it as a Cybertruck without any of the stainless steel tech-bro downsides.—Sajeev Mehta

Lots of ’80s trends are coming back. We see it in music, fashion, and concept cars. Could it be time for a minivan renaissance?

Ford Bronco II

Ford

There were problems, sure, with my new 1986 Ford Bronco II, including the peaky Cologne V-6, which had to be replaced at about 10,000 miles, and the fact that the BII felt like it wanted to tip over on sharp corners. But it was cheap (taking the five-speed manual shaved a lot off the cost), and a little mountain goat off road. Comfortable inside, a decent highway ride, lots of room in back and a neat profile. An SUV like that would find an audience today—build it alongside the Maverick pickup. Make it rugged and relatively bare-bones and start it at $24,500 with air, and it’d sell, maybe including one to me.—Steven Cole Smith

We have the Bronco Sport, but why not give us a bit of ’80s retro styling and a two-door version the next time around?

Ford Excursion

2003 Ford Excursion front three-quarter action
Ford

The Ford Excursion was unapologetically large and inefficient but at the same time had the ability to haul people and things in a way that can make a pickup truck blush. I’ve never owned one and for a long time didn’t understand some owners love affair with the behemoths. Now I understand that the Excursion is the perfect fit for a niche need, and a replacement just hasn’t seemed to come around in recent history.—Kyle Smith

There hasn’t been a heavy-duty SUV available for consumers since the 3/4-ton Suburban left the market more than a decade ago. Ford merged the Super Duty with the F-150 lineup to share cabs starting in 2017, so an Expedition EL on a modified Super Duty chassis would be the quick way to make this happen, but we really love the style of the Expedition and would love to see a modern take on its elegant lines 20 years after it left the market.

Ram Trailduster

Dodge

How is it that Ram has never built a full-size SUV? This one seems like a no-brainer at this point. The Ramcharger name is now appropriately taken by the upcoming hybrid pickup, but we could see a full-size, Ram-based four-door SUV built on the platform that underpins the Jeep Wagoneer and shares plenty with the Ram 1500. The Plymouth Trailduster could lend its name. Build one on 33-inch tires like a Ram Rebel and call it the Prospector for a nod to the past, power it with the same turbocharged hurricane turbo-sixes available in the Ram, and you’ve got a fun family camping rig. Of course this overlaps with the Wagoneer, but since that starts at $63,000, there’s perhaps a bit of room to offer a less-expensive version that competes directly with Tahoe starting in the $50,000 range. Besides, GM hasn’t had any problem selling full-size SUVs using three different brands. The Ram 1500 interiors are there for the taking and so is the Wagoneer chassis, do it already!—Brandan Gillogly

Chevy K5/GMC Jimmy

Brandan Gillogly

I like the newest Colorado/Canyon mid-size pickups from GM, especially in ZR2/AT4X guise. I would love to see a four-door and even a two-door SUV based on that platform go head-to-head with the new 4Runner. We included a photo of a vintage one up above, but like our daydream of a Ram-based SUV we already mentioned, this could use existing pickup steetmetal and interiors and skip the nostalgia. The Blazer and Trailblazer names are used by FWD-based CUVs, so I don’t think it would be blasphemous to use the K5 and Jimmy names considering these things would be able to tackle serious terrain. Just imagine one with the front and rear lockers, skidplates, and the 35-inch tires that come with the top AEV equipment.

There’s a spot for these in GM’s SUV lineup, especially considering Tahoe and Yukon grew a bit in their current generation. I envision the K5 and Jimmy with a five-link rear and about a 115-inch wheelbase for the four-door, close to the last Colorado-based Trailblazer that was sold in Australia, but taking advantage of the fact that the current Colorado’s front wheels are pushed a bit further forward to improve the approach angle. If it would fit in the midsizers, the Duramax 3.0-liter inline-six would be a great powerplant in general, but especially for those looking for long range capability. Otherwise, this would be yet another place for the General to use the 5.3L V-8.—Brandan Gillogly

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: 10 Exotics That Give Broad Arrow’s Tennessee Sale a Twang
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    How could such a list include a Tracker or Aerostar and not the mighty International Scout (I or II)? VW is about to resurrect the Scout badge, but as a EV. I’m afraid…very afraid.

    I read the other day where Ford is going to axe the Escape in favor of more Broncos Sports with their faux off-road looks.
    Pity.
    The Escape is one of the better looking CUVs out there (not much of a contest with the Toyota ancient “angry bird”/Manga transformer looks and that hideous Lexus spindle.

    So I’m not sure where a new Bronco II 2.0 would fit in the lineup.

    I don’t see two door versions of anything 4X4 justifying the expense to create. Maybe one out of 20 modern Wranglers are two door and almost the same for the Bronco. Some of the problem would be the expense today of all the government mandated crap that every vehicle must have. No such thing as “cheap” anymore for a new vehicle.

    Now for the Aerostar, I had one years ago. It’s mileage is as bad as my gen I Explorer (both the 4.0 V6), however to this day it was the best winter vehicle I’ve ever owned bar none. I live in the Lake Ontario snow belt and with those skinny 14″ tires, it would cut through any snow on the road and stay glued and 2wd/4wd was seamless.

    I think the thing to do is start making our own cars. we could start with an old body I guess. V8 fuel injected 4×4 9″ ford rear scout II front diff. jeep straight through transfer case. any body of choice, shortened or channeled if a newer one. same old stuff we’ve done all our life. a whole lot cheaper and simple.

    I think the basis of this article is something we all share: that we wish we had the opportunity to buy No Frills inexpensive vehicles. Sadly, unless we reach a new stage of austerity in the country the people that spend the money will always get their way to buy expensive versions of anything( (RAMTRX, Ford raptor, Jeep gladiator) and only a few stubborn purists want a vehicle that is a little more than street legal suspension, motor, and roll cage. Then, thanks to the government protecting us from ourselves, the cost of meeting safety regulations eliminates any hope whatsoever.

    Having owned versions of four of the listed vehicles, i can’t say any of them but the Xterra are worth bringing back. Purchased new with a 100K mile warranty, the Bronco II spent many days at the dealer repair shop. As soon as the warranty ended, it was for some reason, repair free for another 40K until I totaled it. The Montero was in and out of the repair shop frequently with engine problems until I was hit in the rear wheel while turning and it was flipped on its roof. The Suzuki, a fun little car, but it couldn’t keep up with traffic speeds over 60mph. I have owned two 2015 Xterras and still drive one with 125K on it. Other than sagging rear springs, no problem with either over 200K plus miles. Decent mileage, 17.5mpg using regular gas and all the 4×4 hill and off road options that have worked great on ice, snow and off road in Big Bend and Colorado. I can’t think of any current 4×4 I would consider purchasing to replace it.

    Love our Frontier, wish they still made the Xterra, I’d buy one for the extra room. Simply a body on the pickup chassis

    2008-2012 Ford Ranger. The REAL Ranger; not the pretend truck they are shilling now. That was a GREAT truck.

    Gotta say “WTF” on the Aerostar. Horrible vehicle. Had a whole fleet of them and Explorers when I was an officer on an aircraft carrier. Used them for a lot of things, and the rear end would bob up and down at speed on the interstate if there were no rear passengers or cargo. Hit a bump at 60mph and the rear would actually get air. Scary. No thanks on a reboot.

    These all seem like valid requests, but most won’t happen because people other than us enthusiasts wouldn’t buy them. Other than large SUVs and sports cars, nobody seems to care that everything is wrong-wheel-drive. As long as they sell like crazy, companies will manufacture what adds to their bottom line. Even the large rigs have like a 4-inch front bumper clearance that makes them useless for all but toting the family around. The soccer moms that drive today’s “SUVs” care more about infotainment and self-parking cars than something you can actually have a relationship with.

    Loved the designs and utility of those early SUVs, but Rust back then put most out to pasture too early.
    Back in ’85 My brother (out in farm country) bought a removable top 4Runner, while I picked up a new smaller XJ Jeep Wagoneer. When comparing side by side the metal just seemed thinner on the 4Runner. A number of years later, the 4Runner was starting to decay while the Jeep held it’s own against corrosion from northern Illinois salt. He later replaced the 4Runner with a Montero. Same issue after a number of years. Both his SUVs ended up their lives basically rusting off their frames (actually unibody) just sitting out alongside the barn, a bit too dangerous for the road. They both reminded me of the rust issues we saw on Ford Mavericks and Chevy Vegas my buddies had in the mid 70’s…

    Um duh…Cherokee Sport (XJ) and it’s Comanche cousin. I’m almost convinced they could bring these back (virtually unchanged) and they would sell. Um, ridiculous Hagerty valuation for what’s left of them in the wild would support this.

    I had a 1987 Bronco II 4×4 auto, and my son had a 1988 4×2 5speed. Both were pretty much trouble free. I had mine for 13 years and sold it to a guy I worked with. He still has it. Great little truck. I really enjoyed it.

    I’m surprised that the Suzuki Samurai didn’t make the list…
    Even more surprised that I’m only the 2nd person to point that out…
    Samurai’s were / are simple, light weight and super easy to work on…

    Apropos of none of these vehicles, really, but I’m holding out for
    an AWD version of the SAAB 900 Turbo Convertable. Just imagine…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *