Our Two Cents: Vehicles That Never Got the Engine They Deserved
What vehicle never got the engine it deserved? That’s the question we asked the staff here at Hagerty Media. Our love of cars goes back decades, or centuries if you combined us into one superhero of an automotive journalist, and we’ve all wondered how much better certain cars would be if they had a different engine …
… Or a better engine, something that truly spoke to the rest of the car. Let’s see what alternate realities we have created!
A Standard V-8 for Every Cadillac
For me, it’s the fact that all Cadillac cars (cars—Escalade excluded) from the last 20 or so years lack a standard V-8 engine. GM has an excellent LS motor, and a baby Caddy with a modest 4.8-liter small-block would give buyers more reason to avoid a thirsty BMW for a slightly more thirsty Caddy.
As the Caddy becomes larger, the V-8 engine follows suit (5.3-liter CTS, 6.2-liter CT-6, etc.) with increased displacement, and forced induction for the V-series examples. The inherent torque and simplicity of a pushrod V-8 complements the minimalist architecture of GM’s new EV powertrains, and exclusively pairing those two in a luxury car brand will make Cadillac more appealing than any of its competition. — Sajeev Mehta
As under-the-radar-good (and as mod-friendly) as the ATS-V’s LF4 V-6 is, I agree. After having spent over ten thousand miles with the smaller of the Alpha-chassis Caddys, the ATS should have gotten the 455-horse LT1 from the Camaro, and the ATS-V should have gotten the LT4. — Eddy Eckart
V-8 Bronco Raptor/ Ford GT
Ford Bronco Raptor. Lack of a V-8 is … yeaaaaah. For the record, I am fully aware that you can’t easily fit that V-8 into Ford’s T-6 frame. Actually, here’s the same opinion again: This also applies to the most recent Ford GT. — Matt Tuccillo
For sure, the Ford GT shoulda had a V-8. — Larry Webster
I think I’ll also jump on the Ford GT bandwagon, as I don’t care for the reasoning of why it got the EcoBoost V-6. That car deserved a V-8 based on heritage alone. – Greg Ingold
Yes, please! Kill the flying buttress, make room for a 900+ horsepower Coyote with a twin-screw supercharger. — Sajeev Mehta
V-8 Prowler
The Plymouth Prowler comes to mind. Chrysler Corporation came up with a car that was a modern nod to the classic hot rod but forgot the one factor that people want from a hot rod: A V-8 engine. You have to actively try to miss that detail. I don’t think anyone would’ve minded seeing a 318 Magnum out of a Ram pickup in the Prowler, as long as it came with eight cylinders. — Greg Ingold
Honda Motors in a Modern Lotus
Any modern-day Lotus fits in this category. They make do with Toyota engines but the chassis deserves the character of a Honda motor. — Larry Webster
Having a Lotus with a K-Series would be excellent! Totally agree with that take. — Greg Ingold
A Straight-Six SLK
Let’s not overlook the original Mercedes SLK. This folding-roof roadster needed Mercedes’ juicy and punchy 2.8-liter straight six. That supercharged four-cylinder engine was disappointing, and the manual gearbox was even worse. — Larry Webster
SHO-inental, If Only
I only thought of this car/engine combo since I yanked my 1989 Continental Signature Series out of storage. Turns out it needed new rubber, and tires from a 1989 Ford Taurus SHO are a smidge wider on the same-sized wheel. Getting a set of those and slapping a set of 1/4-inch spacers on the rear gave it a stance that I can’t stop looking at. And now, curiously, it’s getting a lot more compliments. Even the manager of a local burger joint stopped me from giving my order so he could compliment me on it.
He thought it was a Town Car, but that’s not the point. These moments get this Lincoln-restomodding fool thinking about one thing: Ford needed an automatic transmission ready for the Taurus SHO sooner, and should have slapped it all into the 1989 Continental. Such a tragedy! — Sajeev Mehta
Citroën DS
The Citroën DS was so unconventional and interesting that it’s easy to forget there was only ever an old-fashioned, underwhelming OHV four under the hood. The later SM got a Maserati V-6, but the DS was never so lucky. — Andrew Newton
The Sky Shoulda Been the Limit
GM flogged its Ecotec four-banger, and I know they made crazy power for drag racing. But I thought the Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky deserved a more refined motor. — Larry Webster
They needed an LS, maybe just a small-displacement 4.8-liter, to keep Chevrolet appeased with their Corvette’s dominance. But I am sure that was discussed in some conference room at GM, and it was quickly shot down. — Sajeev Mehta
What? You forgot the MGB?
A reasonable engine in ’67, but by the mid ’70’s, it was strangled.
Or you were only thinking of things that ‘should have had a V8’? Not the title of the article, but apparently the actual subject?
I believe the Triton V-10 would have been the logical choice for the Ford GT.
The turbocharged 2.0L in the Solstice and Sky is a perfect fit. We have a Solstice that has great acceleration and pretty good handling also. Will almost keep up with a Porsch Boxer in the curves and blows it away on the straights. A heavier V8 would make the cornering suffer. Usually agreewith and look forward to Hagerty articles, but don’t buy this one.
How about the boxster base engine in the Subarus …while the Forester and Outback are very popular you never want to buy one with the base 2.5 L non-turbo engine…absolutely underpowered…buy one with the turbo which gives almost another 100hp and which you really need to deal with hills etc. Can’t believe Subaru has inflated all their SUV’s (as in made them bigger and bigger but kept the same boxster base engine) and made the. Turbo engine an option.
Maybe I missed a comment but the re-created T-Bird, circa 2000 or, could have not been such a “hairdressers car” if it were offered with a six-speed stick and performance motor. I dream of doing that conversion, but there is always $$$$$$.
Speaking of cars that never had a chance because of the week engine how about that original DeLorean? With a 2.8 L how in the world could that live up to the groundbreaking exterior design?. Do you know how long it would take to make 88 miles an hour? Almost 11 seconds. Yeeeesh
I wonder why Mazda never offered the rotary for the Miata.
One you left out, the DeLorean, under powered, not race worthy for a car that could have been a winner. The second oil shortage in 1979 helped kill it. If only they had found a way to make it competitive for the price point.
For something more conventional, the 2010-2020 Impalas should have had a V-8 option. I truly believe the Corvette engine as an option would have sent sales through the roof.
The Cadillac DTS was produced from 2006-11 and had V8 motors. Unless you don’t consider the Northstar “standard”. Loved my DTS, wish they still made big American sedans.
I’m surprised no one has mentioned the Porsche 718 Cayman/Boxster. That car should never have been built with a 4 cylinder engine, turbo or not. It has the worst sounding engine of any car I have driven. It should have had the flat 6. A couple years from now, it won’t have any engine. Another mistake.
Too bad Ford did not build the Probe GT with the V-8 that was planned. I would have loved one in my 1994. The later Probes looked faster than they were.
i own a ’04 slk 320 and ’02 c230 kompressor. imho the 2.3 sc 4 cyl is a joy to drive – very flexible wite decent power and a neat exhaust note reminiscent of british sports cars (my ex-mercedes tech friend can’t stand my opinion). and the 3.2 litre v6 runs well, but i don’t ‘feel’ it, probably because of too much nvh insulation. wish it had the 2.3
A friend who was a GM engineer dropped an Oldsmobile 215 C.I. all-aluminum V-8 into a Fiero. It weighed less than the Iron Duke 4-cylinder engine, fit better (the Iron Duke had to have a shallow oil pan that limited oil volume), and had no cooling issues. It was the engine that the car should have had all along. Alas, GM had sold that engine to Rover so it was no longer available.
WOW . . . . . Tons of comments. Anybody mention anything about the V6 T-Birds? . . . . .