Our Two Cents: CUVs That Will Become Collectible
This week’s Our Two Cents comes from a conversation I had at a local cars and coffee style show. I tend to be a condescending jerk thought-provoking conversationist in these settings, so a gentlemen who knows my style put me on the spot:
What crossover utility will become collectible in the future?
-Guy at a car show who I forgot to ask permission to use his name.
The answer I gave him is posted below, but later that day my mind went to Nicholas Lintzenich. I once befriended him via his instagram page for his Toyota Highlander, and his admiration for this CUV rivals any adoration for a vintage Mustang or Porsche 911. Pictured above, Lintzenich truly loves his CUV for reasons we can all understand:
“My mother once had one of these. I remember even when they were a lot newer that the Electric Green Mica wasn’t common. When I finally found mine I knew I’d never get rid of it. I’ve only seen a maybe 10 in Electric Green Mica Highlanders in my life and I love finding them whenever I get the chance.”
So perhaps the correct answer to our query is, “Crossovers are already collectible.” But the question still has merit, so I hoped the team here at Hagerty Media had their own thoughts on the matter. They did not disappoint!
Where to start?
Ooo, I think there are many choices! Even though production numbers are high on a lot of them, the fact that the majority have been driven into the ground and eventually scrapped makes finding low-mileage, clean examples difficult.
Most 1990s and early 2000s small/compact SUVs (because the term “crossover” didn’t exist back then) are all pretty cool. The fact that a good number of them also came with manual transmissions is a plus! So with that, here are my choices (all of these are 1st-gen models):
- Honda CR-V
- Honda Element
- Toyota RAV4 (bonus points for the 3-door hardtop and softop)
- Suzuki SX4 (more of a hatchback, but had a unique AWD system and lift kits are available)
- Suzuki X-90
- Isuzu VehiCROSS
- Mazda MPV (When it came with 4WD and before it was a minivan)
Scion xB (2004-06)
For me, its the first generation Scion xB. They were made on the trailing end of Toyota’s lock on making vehicles that were the best engineered, best built, and most reliable out there. Not that newer Toyotas are anything to sneeze at, but this box on wheels was the confluence of one company’s proven engineering and the strong appeal of high roof vehicles in Southeast Asia and North America…for a moment, at least. – Sajeev Mehta
I disagree that the Scion xB even qualifies as any sort of SUV/crossover. No options for AWD/4WD eliminates it from the discussion! – Ben Woodworth
You might be right Ben, but it still isn’t a wagon or a van. – Sajeev Mehta
@Sajeev It’s a car in a cardboard box halloween costume! – Ben Woodworth
Okay Ben, so what are your thoughts on the (Nissan) Cube? – Sajeev Mehta
All just tall cars! All trying to be Honda Elements without any actual utility other than more headroom. – Ben Woodworth
Porsche Cayenne
I think the Porsche Cayenne is starting to see a bit of an enthusiast acceptance. I’ve been to enough Porsche gatherings to see tastefully modded and safari’d examples to think that if there isn’t currently collector status for them, it’s just around the corner.
It’s also the beginning of the luxury SUV as a widely accepted idea, so there’s some significance there. The Cayenne walked so the Lamborghini Urus, Ferrari Purosangue, and friends could run. – Greg Ingold
Toyota FJ Cruiser (2007-14)
I’m not sure any strict soft-roader would make my list, but this does: Thanks to Cars.com, I was able to go back and look at my review of the new 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser ($26,641), and it was not entirely positive. Granted, you could not expect a smooth ride from a vehicle this dedicated to off-road performance, or anticipate a cushy experience from “water-repellent” seats—but there were things I didn’t like that Toyota could have fixed in the second-generation model (such as better outward visibility), which never came.
Despite its value and desirability as a used car, it was not a hot seller when new. Over the years, though, my stance has softened. The FJ Cruiser still looks right even though it debuted at the Detroit auto show in 2003, and the running gear, including the 4.0-liter V-6, is durable. (I had forgotten my tester was a five-speed manual, but in a vehicle like this, I prefer an automatic.) While the FJ Cruiser is really no more off-road capable than the more-common 4Runner, it’s distinct look should let it hold its value. Bring a Trailer has plenty of desirable FJs, usually landing in the mid-$20,000 range. The FJ has found its audience on the used market, and I don’t expect it to appreciate much—there are simply too many out there—I’m not expecting to see a low-mileage FJ under $20k for a while (a 172,000-mile example sold on BaT for $17,250, a bargain) – Steven Cole Smith
Honda Element (2003-11)
The Honda Element with the manual transmission would be one I would love to have in my driveway. I likely would never let it leave. These are spacious, have easy entry/exit, decent fuel economy, and all-wheel drive. What more could I want out of a winter daily driver and back-up car? – Kyle Smith
On A Long Enough Timeline…
The answer is they’ll all be collectible if you wait long enough, just as a Chevy Apache or C-10 is as collectible as a Bel Air. Once something is old enough and rare enough because most of its clones have been scrapped, there will be an interest in it for reasons other than simply transportation. Note how excited Lintzenich is about his Highlander. – Aaron Robinson
Nissan Murano Crosscabriolet (2011-14)
Like folks who collect Yugos (they exist), The Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will have its own very passionate (or ironically passionate) following. Eminently detestable, it’s nonetheless got more oddball personality than just about any other CUV, and there will be a subset of folks who keep the CrossCab’s flame alive. – Eddy Eckart
It appears that subset already exists! Seems like they are currently working around the service nightmare that is the Crosscab’s folding roof, something that no Nissan dealer in their right mind wants to touch. They are learning what many of us already know: find a specialist service outside of the manufacturer’s grasp to get the job done. – Sajeev Mehta
Pontiac Aztek (2001-05)
The Pontiac Aztek will have the last laugh. And get ready for +$50,000 valuations for the camping package. How long will it be before someone writes or says on a video, “the Buick Rendezvous just never had the Aztek’s cachet.” – Stefan Lombard
Pontiac Aztek: Long live the OG Crossover. – Greg Ingold
I regret my previous choice and want to change my answer to Aztek. I think it will be the Chevy Nomad, or Ford Pinto Cruising Wagon for a new generation. And it’s actually a darn good vehicle because it’s a practical minivan under the skin. Even better/worse, it clearly is the winner of our CUV question, because we can’t stop talking about it! – Sajeev Mehta
Nope.
Cadillac Escalade V series
HHR SS
PT Cruiser convertible.
Avalanche
The powerful and unique will command attention
No one wanted a Cube then or in the future. The Ford is just bla.
Anything with a CV transmission will be avoided.
Good suggestions for potential collectors, and yes, the powerful will command an audience, but the article was specifically about crossovers. So I don’t know what there is to nope here. None of your suggestions are crossovers.
The Escalade and Avalanche are body on frame SUV’s… not a crossover.
The PT Loser is a car… not a crossover
HHR is built on the Delta platform, which is shared by the Cobalt, Saturn Ion, etc…. not a crossover
The government saw other wise hence the MPG breaks they got.
The Cube is not a cross over, It is barely a car. Just another box like the Element.
When it comes to the SUV, CUV and Crossover it is all the same. They are utility vehicles with small differences.
I’d argue a bigger difference than you are admitting to. JD Power has something to say about it too.
https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/what-is-the-difference-between-an-suv-and-a-crossover
A CUV should be a unibody construction where an SUV should generally be body on frame.
Even auto manufacturers agree with this designation.
https://www.mitsubishicars.com/crossover-vs-suv-difference
So I would argue that construction is not a small difference, inherent design is a huge difference. Doesn’t matter what the government things when it comes to fuel economy. Kinda surprising you’d use them to prop up a point given your normal verbalized feelings towards the gov’t.
Either way suggestions, while decent ones do not fit the conversation in this article.
That is the technical side. To the unwashed masses that have no idea what body on frame means they are all boxes with utility.
Some are more interesting than others.
But including a Cube here zero’s any credibility. Only Japan understood that one.
Yes, the Cube is more of an MPV than a CUV, but that doesn’t negate the entirety of the article in my opinion. But more power to you if that removes all credibility for you, that’s your prerogative.
And I don’t think it matters what the masses think amongst enthusiasts, does it? I argue it does not, so I stand by my previous comments that it does matter.
I doubt that the “masses” ever even THINK about terms like CUV and SUV, especially the unwashed ones!
To most they are just boxes.
To most they are just another box.
They see cars and utilities.
Tahoe RST as Suburban RST. About any Denali.
Again, none of these are crossovers, they are full on SUV’s
💚💚💚💚
I vote for KIA Souls, but only if they are black. We have a friend who had one and when he was about to be ordained, had to check with his Bishop to see if it was okay to be a Priest with a Black Soul. This is not a joke – it actually happened! I’m thinking that one day, there will be a sunset of collectors who want to take their Black Soul to church each week!
Many people have lost their Souls too.
Oops, I meant subset, not sunset. Although there could be a subliminal connection also…
give me that bike please.
Honda Element. That community is strong. It’s such a versatile vehicle and with the famous Honda reliability. Plus it is good looking as well as practical. And the 5 speed manual transmission? Smooth shifting! Maybe that’s the next vehicle Honda brings back after the Prelude.
You have to admit the first gen RAV4 and CRV are pretty dang cool especially with the manual transmission
They were the introduction to something new, unique, and fresh for crossovers the xB is pretty neat perfect for the Y2K era
I can definitely see the first gen Cayenne becoming a collectible of some sort especially with the 996 and 986 becoming sought after
Now every other crossover made after 2010 just looks like an appliance
Grandma’s 2006 Toyota Rav4 Limited is surprisingly quick for a NA engine.
2006 Toyota RAV4 Limited V6 AWD
0-60 mph 6.3
Quarter mile 14.9
Listed but didn’t otherwise talk about the Vehicross. It was and is a truly unique design and early attempt to go upmarket in the segment.
Nissan Murano Crosscabriolet – The answer to the question nobody asked. The savagegeese guys got one for the laughs.
I can tolerate most of what was presented here, but the Nissan Murano convertible is so awful that I will have a difficult time getting that photo out of my head.