According To You: The Vehicles With The Best Silhouettes

Chevrolet

There’s nothing quite like the sleek side profile of a vehicle with a long hood, a fast roof, and a smooth decklid. But there is more to our shared love of cars, because, we should also consider the smooth, singular sideline of a minivan. While that isn’t an answer one would expect when asking about the most appealing vehicle silhouettes, a minivan is indeed one of the many candidates we received here in this latest installment of our According to You series.

So what other vehicles did members of the Hagerty Community offer for this question? Have a look below and tell us what you think in the comments!

Shelby Daytona Coupe

1965 Shelby Daytona Coupe ReplicaMecum

@DUB6: Hard to beat an early 911 in my book, but really, I’m voting for the Shelby Daytona Coupe. It has some of the muscle of the Cobras built in, with the sloped down nose for aero, the long, sleek roofline, and then that striking rear spoiler and chopped-off tail.

It may not be the most beautiful, but to me, it’s the most striking silhouette out there.

Chevrolet Corvette

1968 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Side Profile
GM

@Bernard: The first few years of the C3 Corvette. I wasn’t around to see them new, but the C3 has always stood out in the school of cool, IMO, especially the silhouette. I think the crash bumpers and other stuff of the later years softened them up too much, but the silhouettes of the early ones could’ve been used as scalpels.

@Tony: I’d say any modern Corvette. They’re all designed in the wind tunnel these days so they’re all aero-efficient, but the later C4s with the rounded ends I think look great.

@Dave Massie: C3 Corvettes—especially the ’80–82 models.

@C: I agree. I am partial to my 1973 Corvette coupe. It’s a one-year-only design and looks great in silhouette.

@Paul: 1984–90 C4 Corvette. The concave rear bumper is just cool. On the other hand, the convex 1990 ZR-1 bumper and its use on the 1991–96 models are strong candidates. In my C4-centric world, the Corvettes nailed the Silhouette Sweepstakes.

Jaguar XKE

Mecum

@Ken_L: I am partial to my C3 Corvette, but I must say the Jaguar XKE coupe has been my favorite since I was very young.

@Howard: And its “top-down” sibling, the XKE droptop roadster … great road car.

@Doug: Hands down, Jaguar E -ype coupe (XKE)

@Jeff: Had a ’68 XKE roadster. I was about to cast my vote for it, but you astutely beat me to it!

@Lew: The first Jag E-Types with the worthless bumpers and glassed headlights.

Jaguar XK-120

Mecum

@Gayle: In ’56, my uncle bought a ’53 Jaguar XK-120 FHC and I have been enamored with that gorgeous profile ever since, especially with the disc wheels and the spats (skirts)!

1963 Riviera

Buick

@Snailish: ’63 Riviera … Not sure what got us there, but for decades after, so many vehicles owed it a debt. It would likely still be a cutting-edge design if evolved to today’s construction methods/rules. But it’s also amazing from several directions, not just the side.

Lamborghini Countach

Alpine Electronics, Inc.

@Shiven: Lamborghini Countach! It absolutely accentuates the ’70s and ’80s realm of excess!

Toyota Previa

Toyota

@ap41563: Toyota Previa! Turn the lights off and illuminate it from behind and the egg shape still looks fresh today, even at 30 years old.

Hyundai Genesis Coupe

Hyundai_Genesis_Coupe_R-Spec_2009_Profile
Hyundai

@Colton: For the more modern, cheaper cars, I’d say the first generation of the Hyundai Genesis Coupe. The car itself was a mixed bag (I owned one for eight years), but the side profile, especially in low light, just highlighted how well that body was sculpted.

MG TF

Mecum

@T.J.: Without a doubt, my 1954 MG TF is a constant head turner with classic vehicle lines (running boards, smooth curvature in fenders, spoked wheel on the exterior of the gas tank, etc.). A timeless beauty.

1961–63 Ford Thunderbird

Ford

@Jon: I have always liked the 1961–63 “bullet” Thunderbirds. There was just something perfect about their profiles.

Third-Generation Pontiac Firebird

1982 Pontiac Firebird S/EPontiac

@Espo70: Third-gen Firebird/Formula/Trans Am. One of the best designs to come out of GM. Still looks exotic today.

Aston Martin Project Vantage

Aston Martin

@George: I might be biased, but the Aston Martin Project Vantage Concept—which became the Vanquish—is the most cohesive and accomplished shape of all time.

1958 Chevrolet Impala

1958 Chevrolet Impala
Mecum

@Don: How about the 1958 Chevy Impala 2-door hardtop? My wife’s uncle thought it looked like a water buffalo!

GMC Motorhome

1978 GMC RV
Hemmings

@Chuck: For oversize vehicles, the 1973–78 GMC Motorhome. Ahead of its time when new, smooth and sleek (compared to other coaches), and has aged gracefully.

@Kent: Still a very sought-after vehicle after all these decades. Would love to have one!

Ferrari 250 GTO

Amalgam Models 250 GTO 4
Amalgam Models

@David: One of the most recognizable, and possibly the most desirable profiles of them all: The 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO by Scaglietti.

Fiat 500

Fiat 500
Stellantis

@Alex: 2012–19 FIAT 500: Totally unique and unmistakable. You would never confuse it for any other car from any other marker.

1966 Oldsmobile Toronado

Oldsmobile

@John: Without question for me it is the 1966 (and only the 1966) Oldsmobile Toronado.

Bugatti Type 57SC Atlantic

Brandan Gillogly

@Tom: So many Ferraris—the Dino, 250 GTO, 275 GTB, La Ferrari, etc., as well as the GT40, Miura, E-Type, and numerous British Roadsters of the ’50s and ’60s. But the granddaddy of all side silhouettes has to be the Bugatti Type 57SC Atlantic.

2003–08 Mazda Mazda6

Mazda

@Mike: From a basic sedan point of view I’ve always loved the 2007 Mazda 6 profile with the spoiler.

1956–57 Continental Mark II

Continental/Ford

@Jeff: The 1956 Continental Mark II is still the most elegant and beautiful production American car.

1984–86 Pontiac Fiero

1984 Pontiac Fiero Coupe
GM

@Jack: 1984–86 Pontiac Fiero notchback. Best-looking shape of the 1970s and ’80s wedge cars.

Flintstones Car

Mecum

@Greg: The log car that Barney Rubble drove on The Flintstones … feet and all!

***

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters.

Read next Up next: The End Is (Very) Near for Gas-Powered Jaguars
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    I’m an f-body guy. And I am befuddled at the choice of a 3rd gen and no mention of the 1st or 2nd gen, two of the most iconic silhouettes around and failing to mention the 68/69 charger? I have scheduled dr appts for all of those questioned. SMH! I understand these are simply opinions but a previa? Really?

    You shouldn’t be befuddled. The thirdgen Firebird was one of the most beautifully yet cleanly designed cars out of GM. It blew everyone away in 82 and still holds up today. I do agree with you sentiment on the 2nd gen…they were also beautiful. The first gen…not so standout to me.

    There are a lot of pretty cars out there. It is all a matter of taste. Vans you left out, the best of them the Ford Econoline’s version 3 and 4. I’m not sure of the year ranges something like 1975- 92 and 1993 to 2000+ the perfect box. I love them. I am also partial to the looks of the Ford Expedition, I also love the corvette and many of the sixties general motors designs, including the mentioned C3s (I prefer the 77 last of the indented roof), the C5 Vette, The BMW 535i 1989-1996, The W123 Mercedes is sweet in any body style, the malibu/Pontiac intermediate 2 dr hardtops, the 63 and 64 Riviera but not the 65 it is too streamlined, many Caddy’s especially the 69 Eldorado and the 57-8 2dr hts, the 70 roadrunner and 61 Valiant 2dr. The 911 Porsche come on there are tons of pretty cars out there and don’t you ever forget the Harley Davidson FLHT “Dresser” The shape that is better known than the Coke bottle. The Shelby Daytona is a race car and does not quite make it as a good looking street rod. The windshield is funny, the door jam and window just don’t fit into the Greek classic forms of proportion. American motors had some pleasant shapes over the years and so did Studebaker.

    The ugliest was most of the kit cars where compound curves were hard to create or visualize on their fiberglass forms.

    Toyota Previa, Mazda 6, 3rd Generation Firebird and GMC motorhome??? The VW beetle, the Citroen 2CV, the Model T Ford and the Oscar Meyer Weinermobile could easily fill those spots.

    ’58 Cadillac Eldorado Barritz convertible, ’56 Mercedes 300 Gullwing, ’52 Jaguar XK120, 1940-41 Fords, pre ’68 big three muscle cars.

    The Mark 4 Toyota Supra Turbo worked for me. People who don’t know cars think it’s a brand new car. The styling is timeless.

    They got the wrong Lamborghini. Yes, the Countach has a unique silhouette. But the Miura is better by far.

    I agree with the other posts above. How could anyone leave out Raymond Loewy’s iconic 1953 Studebaker Commander “Starlight” coupe and the 1963 Avanti? Many listed seem like a joke.

    Some OK choices but the absence of the Porsche 911 couple, which should top the list, is a glaring omission.

    After viewing all vehicles listed under the heading “According to you: the vehicles with the best silhouettes”, I couldn’t help but think that with some who responded, the selection was an act of sarcasm. Be that as it may, the key to this was “according to you”. What was of upmost entertainment was reading the many and some very passionate comments identified that, thank goodness, we all don’t have the same opinion on what vehicle has the best silhouette. I believe the article was successful in getting all of us to eagerly express our passions for automobiles and in some weird instances, fictional cartoon characters.

    WTH? This might be the worst list I have seen here, apparently their best silhouettes equal several of the ugliest cars of all time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *