Vellum Venom Vignette: Avoiding The Jungle of Frontover Accidents

USPS

While not surprised, I am disappointed in how the United States Postal Service’s (USPS) new delivery vehicle has been mocked by car enthusiasts and the general public. Sure, it’s pretty ugly by the standards of the modern automobile. But the design of this Next Generation Delivery Vehicle (NGDV) is actually thoughtful and intelligent. The design centered around the needs of a diverse group of people, and Oshkosh expertly crafted a bespoke delivery vehicle to fit the bill.

But the NGDV shouldn’t be so unique, as its design addresses the growing problem of forward visibility and the senseless deaths it causes in suburban settings. Since Vellum Venom is a car design column, let’s bring it back down to the product level.

From a styling perspective, the NGDV is ugly on proportions alone. There is way too much roof height, and possibly not enough macho-ness in the tiny engine compartment. From a rear three-quarter view it looks like a triangular Toblerone chocolate bar that someone bit off the top.

Oshkosh USPS Truck rear three-quarter electric mail truck
USPS

But there’s more going on: note the hard bend and transitional panel between the roof and side panels. Not only does the back end slant like the old Grumman LLV before it, there’s a strong taper in the body side. That taper allows natural light and shadows play a game with the body, creating an architectural quality magnified by cut lines which make panel replacements easier.

The gray trim indicates places of high traffic, where anything from loading docks to obstacles on the street can mar the surface. Putting gray trim around the back “hoop” of the rear door might be unnecessary given USPS’ wardrobe requirements, but it provides both cohesiveness and a handy place to plop in lights, and sensors/cameras. (The latter ensures these bits won’t detract from the Toblerone-esque design.)

Now is a good time to mention this Vellum Venom article was inspired by a quick scan of the NGDV’s official spec sheet. And doing so ensures we learn why the final product looks so controversial.

Oshkosh USPS Truck features diagram
That’s an interesting dashboard!USPS

The aforementioned insanity of the NGDV’s roof height comes from mandates on the seating, standing, and ingress/egress of “95% of the operator population.” That includes employees ranging from 4’11” tall women up to 6’2″ men. Which explains the overall height, but that bizarre windscreen and hood is likely formed from the following requirement:

“The vehicle shall provide an unobstructed view from the 5th-percentile-female and 95th- percentile-male reference eye locations to a point 2.1m (83 in.) forward of the forward plane at the intersection of the ground and centerline planes.”

This excerpt from the spec sheet is not easy to digest. More digging was needed to learn that the “centerline plane” is an imaginary line that splits the steering wheel into two equal halves. That sounds like a very short distance, so let’s put this visibility challenge to the test: I own truck that I believe to have good visibility, and there’s a tape measure and movable object just a few feet away from it.

Ford Ranger Front Over accidents frontover safety visibility
Or not.Sajeev Mehta

Perhaps I misunderstood the assignment, but I doubt I’m too far off: Look at the last photo of the NGDV, as the dashboard has a tumor-like bulge where the gauge cluster rises up to a shockingly tall steering wheel.

Even if my truck was the 1993-97 Ranger with the not-swollen front fascia, there’s no way I could see that wheelbarrow parked 83 inches away from my steering wheel. I only saw the wheelbarrow’s back handles after propping myself over the steering wheel and pressing my head against the headliner. Doing so was not comfortable, and it still generated a failing grade as per the NGDV’s guidelines!

Even if I got this completely wrong, the problem of frontover accidents from front blind spots is real. NBC did a disturbingly insightful demonstration with children to prove the point, but local news organizations knew the truth many years before. The imagery is terrifying, even more so when overlaying an imaginary yellow line (as per my test with the Ford Ranger).

I saw the issue firsthand when sampling a 2024 Cadillac Escalade for my 25th Anniversary special report. Seeing anything right in front of this Caddy was impossible, and that’s stressful for a journalist who’ll get in hot water if they bump into something in a six-figure SUV they do not own.

2024 Cadillac Escalade Platinum Augmented Reality
Sajeev Mehta

But that fully-loaded Caddy has a front facing camera, with a “dip” in the screen to ensure I see everything between me and the silver Honda Accord at the stop light. Too bad this technology ain’t cheap, and I suspect it will fail after 10+ years of vibrations and heat cycling.

I haven’t seen the NGDV in person, but there’s no doubt the short/sloping hood, droopy windscreen, and bloated dashboard presented in pictures minimize its front blind spot. In turn, it reduces driver fatigue (which I experienced when parking that Escalade) and will save lives in suburban settings. The latter is something Amazon is learning the hard way, and that’s unfortunate for individual and society alike.

I reckon no American production vehicle made after the Curved Dash Oldsmobile has a driver sitting this high and mighty over the dashboard. It’s proof the NGDV is a wonderfully designed vehicle. You could make an argument that the “one-bite into a Toblerone” shape is also well styled, as it worked around the USPS’ packaging constraints with ease.

But common sense design shouldn’t be just for fleets of delivery vehicles. Using logic can make modern vehicles safer without the crutches of cameras and pricey TV screens. You, dear reader, need to appreciate Industrial Design just as much as the artistic world of Transportation Design. You need to applaud the NGDV, and demand its attributes for non-fleet vehicles.

Beauty fades, but good design is forever. The NGDV is indeed a beautiful machine, and now you know why.

Read next Up next: Ford’s No-Cost SupportBelt Highlights Breast Cancer Awareness Month
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    For a purpose built vehicle like this styling is not a factor, but public vehicles styling already has taken too many hits.

    Here is the we add all these safety things but yet we hold few responsible for their action the greatest reducer of accidents. They drive distracted, drunk and recently several people were killed by a stoned driver.

    People just need to be responsible aware of their surroundings.

    I have a vehicle now that wants to steer stop and warn me about everything but a Deere. Works sone times false signals other times. Cameras every place but I still use the mirrors and look before I back up.

    These things that are made to help I feel make drivers less aware and responsible to their surroundings.

    It is a utility vehicle. The beauty is in the unapologetic styling. These things will make great camper conversions down the line.

    Trucks used to have more of this to them, but we as consumers prefer the pretty trucks (i.e., 67-72 C10). The small companies seemed to lean harder into the utility over style mode as well (International). This is one of the interesting things when looking at Studebaker, so much struggle between design and frugal utility compounded with economics of scale. Yet Coupe Express, Bourke Coupe in 53, crazy bullet-nose, and the R-series trucks are good looking (often less-so after refreshes). Even the final Daytona looked decent though almost none were made –certainly not ugly compared to the Chevy II of that moment. The earlier Lark on the other hand… has mixed reviews.

    Great article that makes many good points. Alludes to the truth of why some of the safest cars have such a high fatality count (physics wins and the giant SUV didn’t see you before it ran you over).

    Having worked on commercial vehicles my entire career, I find the design beautiful. I find beauty in something being designed for purpose, putting function over form. Utilitarian vehicles need to perform a job, and everything else is secondary.

    Imo, they absolutely nailed the brief on this design. Garbage/recycling trucks and school buses should get similar front-end designs. Or at least we should embrace the cabover as the default design.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *