Shelby GR-1: The Ford GT sequel that never was

Ford

There is a link between Ford’s 2004 Shelby GR-1 concept and Britain’s national speed limit. How so? Well, the original design was inspired by Shelby’s take on AC Cars’ Cobra Coupe, the very model that in 1964 racing driver Jack Sears tested to 185mph on the M1 motorway, making front-page news, and—allegedly—prompting the government to introduce a 70mph limit three years later. That tale never appeared in Ford’s launch material for the GR-1, but with a claimed top speed of 190mph, it would have made a nice tribute to Sears’ bravado.

Trivia aside, in 2004, Ford was already looking at the performance car horizon after the successful launch of its mid-engined GT. With only 4500 GTs planned, a successor was needed and after in-house designer, George Saridakis, penned a 21st-century homage to the ‘60s Shelby Daytona Coupe (the AC’s wilder sibling), Ford’s head of design, J.Mays, commissioned a clay to be produced. When it received a warm reception at that year’s Pebble Beach Concours, Ford’s Advanced Product Creation (APC) team were tasked with developing a fully functional car – and one, maybe, with production potential.

Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept front three quarter doors up
Ford

The result was quite breathtaking. Using the mid-engined GT’s chassis as a base, modified to allow front/mid installation of a 597 bhp, 6.4-liter, dry-sump V-10 engine, APC presented a muscular, two-seat fastback design, with a traditional cab-rearward stance, crafted from polished aluminum. Two feet shorter than the GT at just 14.5 ft long, the GR-1 successfully melded cues from the original Shelby without looking overtly retro.

Opening its distinctive McLaren-style “butterfly” doors, drivers were faced with a cleanly-styled part-analogue, part-digital dash, incorporating a ‘TireIQ’ system, which, among other things, recorded cornering G-forces via an accelerometer. Speakers for the GR-1’s sound system were built into the headrest wings of the carbon fiber-shelled seats.

This was no mere styling pastiche, either. With the mighty V-10 installed, taken from Ford’s Modular family of engines, the GR-1 was predicted to hit the aforementioned 190mph top speed, and accelerate from 0-60mph in 3.9 seconds, laying its power down through a limited-slip-differential-equipped six-speed manual transaxle, and sending drive to 19-inch rear wheels shod with 345 x 35 tyres.

Making its first public appearance at the 2005 North American International Auto Show, there was obviously still an interest in seeing the GR-1 through to series production, with Phil Martens, Ford’s group vice president of product creation, making a clear statement about its market position: “Our goal this time around was not to create the ultimate top-speed, high-performance sports car. Really, we intended to strike a better balance of design, capability and usability that might appeal to someone considering a Ferrari 575M Maranello.”

Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept rear three quarter
Ford

But as was the case with many a promising concept car, the devil was in the detail, and after the GR-1 was subjected to a full feasibility study, significant changes were identified. To be production viable, its 45-inch height needed to be raised, and its wheelbase—which was seven inches shorter than the GT’s on which it was based—needed to be lengthened, too. The GR-1 was not a light car, either, with the concept weighing in at 3900 lb. Ford’s target production weight was 3500 lb, and consideration was given to replacing the GR-1’s V-10 with a V-8 to achieve that goal.

In the end, though, Ford’s production dreams for the GR-1 wouldn’t pan out. While the changes needed didn’t present insurmountable hurdles for the car’s development team, Ford was starting to get its fingers burned with GT sales. After an initial rush of orders when the car launched in 2004, demand had dropped significantly two years later. Faced with the prospect of only selling 4000 GTs from the originally-conceived 4500-car run, Ford’s accountants could only see the same scenario playing out with a production GR-1, and slammed on the brakes.

Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept rear
Ford

That isn’t quite where the story ends, though. There was still a lot of love for the GR-1 in enthusiast circles, and one person could still see its potential in a more limited market. Lance Stander, CEO of California-based Superformance—distributors of low-volume, high-end recreations, such as the Corvette Grand Sport, Cobra, GT40, and Shelby Daytona Coupe—sought to reach an agreement with Ford and Shelby America to purchase the rights to produce a modified version of the GR-1. After many years, they succeeded, and in 2019 Superformance announced that it would be taking orders for its own Shelby GR-1, with the choice of either an aluminum or carbon fiber body, and an output of 750bhp from a Ford V-ok8 engine. The predicted cost: $250,000.

Unfortunately, the federal government recently halted implementation of the regulation which would have given Superformance exemption from the safety and labelling standards required to build the Shelby GR-1 in low volumes. But we still live in hope…

 

***

 

Check out the Hagerty Media homepage so you don’t miss a single story, or better yet, bookmark it. To get our best stories delivered right to your inbox, subscribe to our newsletters

Via Hagerty UK

Click below for more about
Read next Up next: 6 hot rods from the 3 Dog Garage collection
Your daily pit stop for automotive news.

Sign up to receive our Daily Driver newsletter

Subject to Hagerty's Privacy Policy and Terms of Conditions

Thanks for signing up.

Comments

    Leave it to the feds to screw things up once again. Glad that we cannot blame the bean counters for this one,
    as percentage wise they are probably as plentiful in the population as the rest of us gearheads. I am wondering though, as I understand that Big Tech, and world corporations oversee our government, who is mad at Ford for having the audacity to bring out a wonderfully beautiful car that many people would buy, and have the feds change the law to prevent it from being produced?

    The way I read it, the bean counters killed it at Ford. The feds killed the collaboration deal over safety concerns. Someone at ford should take the head bean counter out for a ride. And someone at Feds just paid someone back for something or another.

    Years ago we saw this car on display at the Chicago Auto Show. The Daytona Coupe was my first automotive hardon at age 13 when it came out and I have a Shell Valley Daytona Coupe replicar. This thing instills similar desires in me!

    Licensing agreements at this level are very tricky for all parties. I’ve witnessed a few fall flat on their collective faces. It was not pretty. Ford, just make the car. Geeez

    The execs want their bonus, and they want it NOW. never mind in 4 years down the road when the gold will pour in from radiation from a project like this. NOWNOWNOW$$$ Don’t like it buy a prius.

    I agree. Also, wasn’t the Daytona coupe designed by Pete Brock while he was working for Shelby? I don’t think there was an “AC Coupe” per se, it was actually named the Cobra Daytona coupe.

    So where in the Sam-hill is that prototype now?… or is it just sitting in a dusty Ford garage somewhere, sigh*

    Bill Thomas’ Cheeta immediately came to my mind when I saw the first picture (profile shot).
    Ironic as it was concieved to compete with Shelby’s cobras.

    The Ford Concept car, the GR1 was one hell of a very nicely sculpted design with very sleek body lines flowing threw out the car making it a real “Eye-bopper” to behold! The Aluminum body was highly polished and detailed to the hilt, absolutely stunning to the eyes. My wife and I first saw this Gr-1 at the Chicago new car Auto-show back in 2005, it was beautiful then and highly desired and it still is today too! Simply “Awesome”!

    Beautiful outside, however, the inside looks like something out of a hot Mitsubishi,
    Give me an engine turned dash with some sw or smith gauges.

    Superformance could, in theory, still make the car and just sell the engine separate, it would essentially become a Kit Car however.

    Methinks that Ken Sousa was closer to the truth on this tale. Gummint interference in car matters is so commonplace these days that it’s sickening.

    What ever happened to letting the free market test out ideas? Superformance, FactoryFive—these folks are contemporary models of how Shelby Performance started. This car idea would either have legs or it would fail, but let it happen in the free market!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *